240 likes | 406 Vues
Bachelor of Arts Program Code 110. Report on Academic Year 2009-2010. Bachelor of Arts. 2009-10 Priority Outcomes. Student-Learning Outcomes: List of All Program Student-Learning Outcomes. Institutional Mission Provide quality educational opportunities
E N D
Bachelor of Arts Program Code 110 Report on Academic Year 2009-2010 Bachelor of Arts
2009-10 Priority Outcomes Student-Learning Outcomes: List of All Program Student-Learning Outcomes
Institutional Mission • Provide quality educational opportunities • Prepare students for professional success • Act as a driving force in the cultural life of the region School and Departmental Mission • Prepare students for entry into a number of art-related professions or endeavors by completing a broad, yet organized, curriculum in both art history and studio-related courses Strategic Plan 2013 Core Values • The Department values student learning as a top priority • The Department focuses resources to achieve optimal student learning • The Department provides cultural and social development Goals • The Department maintains and enhances Cameron’s commitment to providing programs of the highest quality in instruction, research, and service to better meet the needs of the citizens of the region. (Plan 2013 Goal I.1.1) • The Department ensures effective assessment of student learning, including experiential learning. (Plan 2013 Goal I.1.3) • The Department provides opportunities for students to demonstrate their scholarship in regional and national forums. (Plan 2013 Goal I.1.6) • The Department makes effective use of existing and new facilities. (Plan 2013 Goal III.3.1) • The Department expands the number of educational, cultural, and social opportunities for the region.(Plan 2013 Goal III.3.6) • The Department increases Cameron University Alumni Association membership by expanding visibility through off-campus events, developing services, and creating opportunities that engage alumni. (Plan 2013 Goal IV.4.4) • The Department develops partnerships with area businesses and industries, including encouraging use of conferencing facilities and matching educational offerings to employer needs. (Plan 2013 Goal IV.4.9) Student-Learning Outcomes: Alignment of Student-Learning Outcomes
Student-Learning Outcomes: Measures of Student-Learning Outcomes
Program methodologies that address shortfalls in student learning prior to graduation • Studio course critiques provide direct feedback for improvement • Curriculum structure and faculty interaction • Mid-level review Student-Learning Outcomes: Program Methodologies That Address Shortfalls in Learning
2007-08 Priority Outcome 1 Student-learning outcome BA students will use the journal to record the conceptual progression and development of imagery, to include the analysis and synthesis of accumulated information Evidence that action is being implemented • Action item: Create a “blueprint” to make journal components consistent throughout studio courses • An Academic Journal “blueprint” prototype was formulated for use in studio courses to systematize an approach for documenting all or selected components of the creative process Program Actions Since Last Assessment Presentation: Evidence That Action Is Being Implemented
2007-08 Priority Outcome 2 Student-learning outcome • BA students will identify and analyze the elements and principles of design within compositions of various styles Evidence that actions are being implemented • Action item: Expand emphasis on form analysis and use of design vocabulary when analyzing works of art in advanced studio courses during critique sessions • Students are now required to complete analyses of their own artwork as well as others, with particular emphasis on addressing the use of the elements and principles of design Program Actions Since Last Assessment Presentation: Evidence That Action Is Being Implemented
2007-08 Priority Outcome 3 Student-learning outcome BA students will demonstrate ability to evaluate and interpret works of art through the process of formal analysis Evidence that actions are being implemented • Action item: Expand emphasis on form analysis through writing in advanced studio courses • Students are required to complete a written formal analysis of a specific artwork, addressing the use of the elements and principles of design and subsequent interpretation • Action item: Develop a formal analysis rubric to ensure consistency of evaluation • A formal analysis rubric for measuring the essay was developed to increase reliability and validity of the results Program Actions Since Last Assessment Presentation: Evidence That Action Is Being Implemented
2009-10 Priority Outcome 1 New Student-Learning Outcomes and Measurements
2009-10 Priority Outcome 1 New Realistic drawing: singular or mixed drawing medium Realistic drawing: technical skills with a drawing medium Aggregate mean result = 3.7 (excellent rating) Data rating: 5-4 = Superior, <4-3 = Excellent, <3-2 = Satisfactory, <2 = Unsatisfactory Display of Assessment Data
2009-10 Priority Outcome 1 New Data rating: 5-4 = Superior, <4-3 = Excellent, <3-2 = Satisfactory, <2 = Unsatisfactory Analysis of Assessment Data
2009-10 Priority Outcome 1 New Action Plan
2009-10 Priority Outcome 2 New Student-Learning Outcomes and Measurements
2009-10 Priority Outcome 2 New Multiple choice exam: design identification Essay: formal analysis Essay: reflection Essay: topic specific NA Class presentation of design concepts Aggregate mean result = 3.3 (excellent rating) Data rating: 5-4 = Superior, <4-3 = Excellent, <3-2 = Satisfactory, <2 = Unsatisfactory Display of Assessment Data
2009-10 Priority Outcome 2 New Data rating: 5-4 = Superior, <4-3 = Excellent, <3-2 = Satisfactory, <2 = Unsatisfactory Analysis of Assessment Data
2009-10 Priority Outcome 2 New Action Plan
2009-10 Priority Outcome 3 New Student-Learning Outcomes and Measurements
2009-10 Priority Outcome 3 New Portfolio review: creativity Portfolio review: technical skill, design, and media Aggregate mean result = 2.9 (satisfactory rating) Data rating: 5-4 = Superior, <4-3 = Excellent, <3-2 = Satisfactory, <2 = Unsatisfactory Display of Assessment Data
2009-10 Priority Outcome 3 New Data rating: 5-4 = Superior, <4-3 = Excellent, <3-2 = Satisfactory, <2 = Unsatisfactory Analysis of Assessment Data
2009-10 Priority Outcome 3 New Action Plan