1 / 6

Anna Ledin H ead of department

SEED Department of Sustainable development, Environmental Sciences and Engineering Institutionen för Hållbar utveckling , Miljövetenskap och Teknik. Anna Ledin H ead of department. Evaluation criteria. Criteria for Scientific Quality: Research question Method and performance

deanna
Télécharger la présentation

Anna Ledin H ead of department

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SEEDDepartment of Sustainable development, Environmental Sciences and EngineeringInstitutionenförHållbarutveckling, MiljövetenskapochTeknik Anna Ledin Head of department

  2. Evaluation criteria Criteria for Scientific Quality: • Research question • Method and performance • Scientific competence Criteria for Societal Value: • Societal value of research question • Communication with stakeholders/end users

  3. Criteria of Scientific Quality Research question • Scientific significance of the aim • Originality, innovativeness and boldness of aim, theories and/or hypotheses • Potential for scientifically significant outcomes • Aim in line with the call for applications Method and performance • Feasibility and adequacy of scientific methods • Innovativeness and boldness of methodology • Concrete and realistic work plan • Concrete and realistic plan for scientific deliverables • Coordination of project and research group • Suitability of multi- and interdisciplinary approaches • Ethical considerations Scientific competence • Quality of scientific publications • Ability to carry out the project according to plans • Adequate experience of project management • National and international activities, including projects, networks, assignments, commissions of trust, and participating at or arranging workshops or conferences • Strength and competitiveness of the research team

  4. Criteria of Societal Value Societal value of research question • Research question addresses important societal issues and/or issues of importance for Formas’ sectors • Project may, in a short- or long-term perspective, contribute to sustainable development • Awareness of stakeholder/end user needs when designing the project • Aim in line with the call for applications Communications with stakeholders/end users • Description of relevant stakeholders/end users • Concrete and realistic plan for communicating results with relevant stakeholders/end users • Experience and ability to communicate research results with stakeholders/end users

  5. Whenevaluatingsocietalvalue Pay attention to the type of project Scientific quality always of high importance, societal value may receive lower weight E.g. Clearlystatedwhy it is not applicabletohave a plan for communicationwithstakeholders

  6. The panel meeting in October Applications discussed at the meeting should be given an overall grade (A-C) – where (Scientific quality/Societal value) A = Excellent/High B = Good/Medium C = Insufficient/Low Applications that were not forwarded to step 2 are given the overall grade X = Not evaluated in step 2

More Related