1 / 11

Three Normative traditions

Three Normative traditions. Why states act, how they act and whether change is needed and/or feasible. How they reason. Realist: Empirical observations (inductive) Liberal: A rational design exists (deductive) Revolutionist: diagnostic and prescriptive (imperative). Human nature and progress.

debbiehart
Télécharger la présentation

Three Normative traditions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Three Normative traditions Why states act, how they act and whether change is needed and/or feasible

  2. How they reason • Realist: Empirical observations (inductive) • Liberal: A rational design exists (deductive) • Revolutionist: diagnostic and prescriptive (imperative)

  3. Human nature and progress • Realist: human nature is evil, rogues prey on fools, conflict and violence are inevitable. • Liberal: There is an underlying design of moral good (moral law). Human nature is blank/good, progress inevitable. • Revolutionist: only the ‘doctrine’ is good. Hard vs. soft solutions

  4. Nature of International Politics • Realist: a state of nature, no common sovereign, anarchy, war of all against all. • Liberal: An international society exists (a social contract for states) but needs more law and institutions. • Revolutionist: all politics is one: the brotherhood of man, solidarity by example or by force.

  5. Power and National Interest • Realist: Politics is utility. Morality derives from power. A state only pursues self-interest. • Liberal: Power must be transformed into legitimate authority. Justice must limit self-interest. • Revolutionist: (hard) end justifies means, (soft) power is never a means.

  6. The state • Realist: state is the final form of political organization. • Liberal: international society to limit or transcend the state. • Revolutionist: state is a false unit, universal oneness is the goal.

  7. War and Peace • Realist: war is inevitable, peace is the laboratory of war. War is the extension of the pursuit of interest. • Liberal: peace is the norm, war a violation. Only ‘just war’ to restore peace. • Revolutionist: (hard) war is the agent of change, the doctrine, not peace is the goal.(soft) pacifism and non-resistance.

  8. Balance of Power and Diplomacy • Realist: States seek a positive Balance of Power. diplomacy is the intelligent application of power. • Liberal: BoP is a key institution to distribute power evenly. Diplomacy reconciles national interest • Revolutionist: one world republic, rejects BoP ‘game.’ Open conferences, no secret diplomacy

  9. International Law and Organization • Realist: law does not bind states: rebus sic stantibus. No organization is legitimate that replaces the state. • Liberal: Law precedes states: Pacta sunt Servanda. Organization must ‘hem in’ the state. • Revolutionist: the doctrine is law. IL is ideology of the Status Quo. Organization is civitas maxima

  10. Politics and Morality • Realist: IP is governed not by rights but by interests, by Raison d’ etat. (non-moral) • Liberal: Statesmen are trustees to seek interest tempered by justice. • Revolutionist: (soft) denial of self interest to bring about good.

  11. Conclusion • Realist: “…and every man did that which was right in his own eyes.” (Judges 17:6) • Liberal: “The great task is to discover what [governments] ought to prescribe, for no prescription is valid against the conscience of mankind.” (Lord Acton) • Revolutionist: “Philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways: the point, however, is to change it.” (Karl Marx).

More Related