chapter 1 the economic and institutional setting for financial reporting n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Chapter 1 The Economic and Institutional Setting for Financial Reporting PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Chapter 1 The Economic and Institutional Setting for Financial Reporting

Chapter 1 The Economic and Institutional Setting for Financial Reporting

121 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 1 The Economic and Institutional Setting for Financial Reporting

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 1The Economic and Institutional Setting for Financial Reporting Learning Objectives: What is accounting? Why financial statements are important? Who are the users of financial statements? How do these users use financial statements? What is GAAP? What is the standard setting process? What are some qualitative characteristics of accounting information? What are some major concepts and assumptions underlying accounting principles?

  2. What is Accounting ? • An information system to account for all business transactions and translate these transactions into accounting/financial terms to be reported in financial statements.

  3. Why Financial Statements Are Important ? • Assess the risks (i.e., credit risk, asset risk) • Provide a comprehensive economic history of a business entity • Thus, financial statement can be used for various purposes (p3 of the textbook): • As an analytical tool. • As a management report card. • As an early warning signal. • As a basis for prediction. • As a measure of accountability.

  4. Financial Statements and Financial Reporting Additional Information Economic Entity Financial Statements Financial Information Accounting? Identifies and Measures and Communicates Balance Sheet Income Statement Statement of Cash Flows Statement of Owners’ or Stockholders’ Equity Note Disclosures President’s letter Prospectuses, SEC Reporting News releases Forecasts Environmental Reports Etc. GAAP Not GAAP

  5. Learning Objective : Describe the demand and supply for financial statements

  6. Shareholders and investors Investment decisions/stewardship function Proxy contests Lenders and suppliers Lending decisions Covenant compliance Customers Supplier’s health Repeat purchases Warranties & supports Managers and employees Performance assessment Compensation contracts Company-sponsored pension plans Government and regulatory agencies Mandatory reporting Taxing authorities Regulated industries Who are the users of Financial Statements ?Why do they demand financial Statements?

  7. Supply of financial information • Relevant financial information is provided primarily through financial statements and related disclosure notes. • Major Financial statements: Balance Sheet, Income Statement, Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Statement of Cash Flows. • Disclosures • Other forms of information: Press releases and management discussions (MD&A).

  8. Type of Disclosures: • Mandatory Disclosure (i.e., leases, pension plans, etc.): Required by the SEC and accounting standards. • Voluntary disclosure: Guided by cost/benefit considerations.

  9. Disclosure Benefits • The following are benefits arising from voluntary disclosures : • Increase investors’ confidence on the quality of company’s equity offerings. • Obtain capital cheaply from the capital markets. • Get better deals from suppliers.

  10. Disclosure Costs • The costs which may arise from voluntary disclosures : • Information collection, processing and dissemination costs. • Competitive disadvantage costs. • Litigation costs. • Political costs.

  11. Case Study 1: WorldCom (source: RCJM textbook) (WSJ 8/5/2002 – Improper Capitalization) • It’s May 2002 and your brother says you should buy WorldCom shares. • The shares look “incredibly cheap” at $2.00 because the company has a book value of $20.50/share and cash of $0.73/share. • WorldCom has weathered the industry downturn better than other companies. • But an article in this morning’s paper raises a new concern: Holding steady despite declining message volume Fixed “rental” payment Message volume

  12. Epilogue of WorldCom • In June 2002, WorldCom says $3.8 billion in line cost expenses were wrongly transferred to the balance sheet as assets. • Share price falls to $0.06. • $11 billion of improper transfers are eventually uncovered. In July 2002, the company declares bankruptcy. FUTURE ASSET BENEFITS ? $3.8 b EXPENSE NO FUTURE BENEFITS

  13. Case Study 2: AOL (Source: RCJM Textbook) • AOL spent $363 million on subscription promotion (costs paid for subscriber starter kits, direct marketing mailers, etc.) in 1996 while only recognized $126 million of that amount as advertising expense in 1996, deferring the rest as assets. • In May 2000, AOL agreed to pay a fine of $3.5 million to SEC due to its violation of GAAP in deferring subscriber acquisition costs in 1995 and 1996.

  14. Lessons learned • Financial statement fraud is rare—but users should NOT simply accept the numbers at face value. • Flexibility in accounting standards provides opportunities for companies to manipulate the information reported in the financial statements. • Self-interest can also drive managers to overstate the income number, especially when compensation is based on earnings.

  15. Learning Objectives • Define generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) • The need for GAAP • The historical development of accounting standards • The standard setting process of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)

  16. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) • GAAP: Accounting methods with substantial authoritative support to be used by business entities in preparing external reports for users. • Most of what constitutes U.S. GAAP is in the form of written pronouncements issued by the FASB and its predecessors.(i.e., APB). • The need for the GAAP.

  17. GAAP (Contd.) • Public held companies and certain regulated companies are required to use GAAP in preparing financial statements. • Reasons?

  18. Who Prescribes the Standards? Public Sector Private Sector American Institute of Certified Public Accountants AICPA U.S. Congress SEC FASB IASB Securities and Exchange Commission Financial Accounting Standard Board International Accounting Standard Board

  19. YearAuthorityOfficial Release 1934 Congress SEC Regulation S-X ASR and FRR Staff Accounting Bulletins 1938 Accounting Profession AICPA 1938-1959 CAP ……… ARBs (51) 1959-1973 APB ……… APB Opinions (31) 1973 FASB ……. 1. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 2. Interpretations 3. Concepts of Financial Accounting 4. Technique Bulletins 5. Statements issued by EITF

  20. The U. S. GAAP • Includes: 1. FASB statements (1973 - Present) 2. FASB Interpretations ( 1973 - Present) 3. APB Opinions (1959 - 1973) 4. APB Interpretations (1959 - 1973) 5. CAP, ARBs (1938 - 1959) 6. Other Authoritative Pronouncements (i.e., ASR & FRR of the SEC, Technique Bulletins/Staff Positions of FASB, and Staff Acct. Bulletins of the SEC, Abstracts of EITF, SOP of the AICPA, etc.)

  21. FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) (Source: SFAS 168) • Effective July 1, 2009, FASB Accounting Standards Codification became the single source of authoritative, nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. • The pronouncements of the SEC are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.

  22. The Codification Research System (CRS) (Source: SFAS 168) • Codification Research System(CRS): An online database developed by the FASB to allow easy access to the Codification (and therefore, the GAAP) online. • CRS uses a numerical index system in which numerical numbers are used to correspond with topics, subtopics, sections and paragraphs.

  23. Accounting Standards Codification (contd.) • The Codification does not change GAAP but only the way the existing accounting standards are organized.

  24. The Accounting Standard Setting Process of the FASB (A Due Process) (source: FASB Website) • The Board identifies an accounting issue based on requests received from various sources. • The Chairman decides whether to add a project to the technical agenda after consulting with other members and subject to oversight by the Foundation’s Board of Trustees.

  25. The Accounting Standard Setting Process (contd.) • The Board deliberates the various issues identified and analyzed by the staff at one or more public meetings. • The Board issues an Exposure Draft (In some case, the Board may issue a Discussion Paper to obtain comments prior to issuing the Exposure Draft.)

  26. The Accounting Standard Setting Process (contd.) • The Board holds a public roundtable meeting on the Exposure Draft, if necessary. • The staff analyzes comment letters, public roundtable discussion, and any other information .

  27. The Accounting Standard Setting Process (contd.) • The Board re-deliberates the proposed provisions at one or more public meetings. • The Board issues an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) to amend ASC by a simple majority vote. • The passage of an ASU requires 3 votes. (note: effective 7/2008, FASB members reduced from 7 to 5).

  28. Learning Objective Introduce the importance and the need of IFRS

  29. The Need for International Accounting Standards • Companies doing business in more than one nations found that it is hard to comply with more than one set of accounting standards established by authorities in different nations. • In response to this problem, International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) was formed in 1973 to develop a single set of global accounting standards. Environment and Theoretical Structure of Financial Accounting

  30. The History of International Accounting Standard Setting (cont.) • 41 International Accounting Standards (IAS) was issued by IASC. • IASC created International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in April, 2001 to be in charge of prescribing the standards. • IASB endorsed 41 IAS and named its pronouncement as International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS). Environment and Theoretical Structure of Financial Accounting

  31. Convergence of the U.S. Accounting Standards and the International Accounting Standards • To increase the international comparability and the quality of US accounting standards, the FASB has been engaged in activities to increase the convergence of the accounting standards. • The FASB is working closely with the IASB toward the convergence of accounting standards (i.e. to develop a single set of standards). Environment and Theoretical Structure of Financial Accounting

  32. Short-Term International Convergence (source: FASB Project Updates) • The IASB and the FASB acknowledged that convergence of IFRS and U.S. GAAP is a primary objective of both Boards. • To achieve this objective and to improve the financial reporting in the US, the FASB started a short term project, conducted jointly with the IASB, to eliminate narrow differences between US GAAP and IFRS (or IAS) in October, 2002. Environment and Theoretical Structure of Financial Accounting

  33. A Single Global Accounting Language- International financial reporting standards? • The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is proposing a Roadmap for the potential use of financial statements prepared in accordance with “IFRS” by U.S. issuers for purposes of their filings with the SEC. • This Roadmap sets forth several milestones that, if achieved, could lead to the required use of IFRS by U.S. issuers in 2014.

  34. Current Compliances • Since there is no single set of high-quality accounting standards, domestic (U.S.) firms filing reports with the SEC must use U.S. GAAP. • Foreign issuers filing reports with the SEC can use U.S. GAAP, the international standards or the GAAP of its home country. • If foreign firms chose not to use U.S. GAAP, they must file reports with reconciliation to U.S. GAAP. Environment and Theoretical Structure of Financial Accounting

  35. A Single Global Accounting Language- International financial reporting standards • In November 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed a roadmap for the US issuers to prepare financial statements in accordance with “IFRS” for the purposes of their filings with the SEC. • This roadmap, if achieved, could lead to the required use of IFRS by U.S. issuers in 2014.

  36. A Single Global Accounting Language (contd.) • In February 2010, the SEC reaffirms its commitment to one set of accounting standard and continues to encourage the convergence of standards between the US and IFRS. • The SEC will make the decision of adopting IFRS for US issuers in 2011 with a progress report on this issue expected in October 2010.

  37. Learning Objective The Financial Reporting Reform- the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

  38. The Financial Reporting Reform • As a result of numerous financial scandals, Congress passed the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002, commonly referred to as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. • The purpose of Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) is both to enforce accurate financial reporting and to drive the development of stronger internal processes.

  39. The Financial Reporting Reform and the Sarbanes and Oxley Act • The collapse of Enron, the dissolving of Arthur Andersen and the accounting scandals of some high-profile firms(WorldCom, Xerox, Global Crossing, etc.)severely damaged public confidence in the accounting profession and the financial reporting. • At the demand of the public, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed in July 2002 to restore the public confidence in the credibility of the financial reports.

  40. The Financial Reporting Reform and the Sarbanes and Oxley Act (Cont.) • Key Provisions of the Act including: • Creating the Public Accounting Company Oversight Board: establish auditing standards. • Increasing Corporate Executive Accountability: they must personally certify both the financial statements and disclosures) • Prohibition of Non-Audit Services (i.e., bookkeeping, internal audit, appraisal, and other consulting services) Environment and Theoretical Structure of Financial Accounting

  41. The Financial Reporting Reform and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Cont.) • Retention of work Papers for 5 years. • Auditor Rotation • Conflict of Interest. • Hiring of Auditor: by the audit committee, not the management. • Evaluation of Internal Control: the management needs to document and assess the effectiveness of internal control. Auditors of the firm need to state:1)whether the management’s assessment is fair, and 2)whether the internal control of the firm is effective. Environment and Theoretical Structure of Financial Accounting

  42. Learning Objectives • Identify the objectives of financial reporting, the qualitative characteristics of accounting information, and the elements of financial statements. • Describe the four basicassumptions underlying GAAP • Describe the four basic accountingprinciples that guide accounting practice.

  43. Conceptual Framework of Financial Reporting • How does the FASB prescribe the accounting standards? • Definition of “Conceptual Framework of Financial Reporting”: A system of interactive objectives and fundamentals which can lead to a set of consistent standards in preparing financial reports.

  44. The Conceptual Framework Objectives of Financial Reporting (SFAC No. 1) Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information (SFAC No. 8) Elements of Financial Statements (SFAC No. 6) Recognition and Measurement Criteria (SFAC No. 5) Environment Implementation Implementation assumptions principles constraints

  45. SFAC No. 1 (Level One of The Conceptual Framework) • Objectives of financial reporting: Providing information 1. useful in making investment and credit decisions; 2. useful in assessing future cash flows; 3. about entity resources, claims to the resources and changes of these resources.

  46. Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information I. Primary Qualities 1) Relevance a) Predictive value b) Confirmatory value c) Materiality 2) Faithful Representation a) Complete b) Neutral c) Free from error SFAC No. 8 (Chapter 3: Qualitative Characteristics of Useful Financial Information ) (Level Two of The Framework)

  47. SFAC No. 8 (contd.) II. Enhancing Qualitative Characteristics 1) Comparability(including consistency) 2) Verifiability 3) Timeliness 4) Understandability

  48. SFAC No. 5 (Level Three of The Conceptual Framework) • Measurement and Recognition Concepts I. Assumptions 1) Economic Entity 2) Going-concern (continuity) 3) Monetary unit 4) Periodicity (Period of time)

  49. SFAC No. 5 (contd.) II. Principles 1) Historical cost (exception:LCM of inventory) 2) Revenue recognition (exceptions: 3) Matching 4) Full Disclosure (footnote disclosure) III. Constraints 1) Cost-Benefit 2) Materiality 3) Industry Practice 4) Conservatism

  50. The Accounting Standard Compliance System in the US • The interrelationship of the SEC and the FASB: FASB: the current rule making body. SEC: the enforcing agency of securities laws and accounting standards; regulating the stock market.