1 / 58

Web-Based LBMS

Proximity Generation for Location-Based Mobile Applications “ . . . meanwhile, back at the server.” Jim Wyse Canadian Information Processing Society NL, June 2012 Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Research Centre (WCMCRC), Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University.

declan
Télécharger la présentation

Web-Based LBMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Proximity Generation for Location-Based Mobile Applications “ . . . meanwhile, back at the server.”Jim WyseCanadian Information Processing Society NL, June 2012Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Research Centre (WCMCRC), Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University

  2. Web-Based LBMS

  3. Mobile Business • transactions through communication channels that permit a high degree of mobility by at least one of the transactional parties.

  4. Location-Based m-Business • m-business with location-referent transactions: transactions in which the geographical proximity of the transactional parties is a material transactional consideration. • Critical technological capability: location awareness.

  5. Location-Awareness The capability to obtain and use the geo-positions of the transactional parties to perform one or more of the CRUD (create, retrieve, update, delete) functions of data management.

  6. The Data Management Problem • Location-referent transactions are supported by proximity queries: What is my proximity to a goods-providing (or service-offering) location in a specified category? • A proximity query bears criteria that reference static attributes (e.g., hospital) and dynamic attributes (e.g., nearest). • Proximity queries are burdensome to servers using conventional query resolution approaches

  7. Proximity Generation – An Example The Client-Based i-DAR Prototype (Architecture: Client-Based Functionality, Server-Based Locations Repository)

  8. Web-Based i-Prox Prototype (Architecture: Functionality and Locations Repository are both Server-Based)

  9. i-Prox Tracking GPS

  10. Other Proximity Generators Weblocal Yellow Pages foursquare GEOS IERC WiGLE

  11. Selected i-Prox Implementations 1: Small Craft Harbours(Marine Services) 2: Smart Bay(Real-time Weather Conditions, etc.) 3: Public Libraries(Free Wireless Internet) 4: Avalon Accomodations(Small Inns, B&Bs) 5: Town of Placentia

  12. Small Craft Harbours

  13. Selected i-Prox Implementations 1: Small Craft Harbours(Marine Services) 2: Smart Bay(Real-time Weather Conditions, etc.) 3: Public Libraries(Free Wireless Internet) 4: Avalon Accomodations(Small Inns, B&Bs) 5: Town of Placentia

  14. Selected i-Prox Implementations 1: Small Craft Harbours(Marine Services) 2: Smart Bay(Real-time Weather Conditions, etc.) 3: Public Libraries(Free Wireless Internet) 4: Avalon Accomodations(Small Inns, B&Bs) 5: Town of Placentia

  15. Selected i-Prox Implementations 1: Small Craft Harbours(Marine Services) 2: Smart Bay(Real-time Weather Conditions, etc.) 3: Public Libraries(Free Wireless Internet) 4: Avalon Accomodations(Small Inns, B&Bs) 5: Town of Placentia

  16. Selected i-Prox Implementations 1: Small Craft Harbours(Marine Services) 2: Smart Bay(Real-time Weather Conditions, etc.) 3: Public Libraries(Free Wireless Internet) 4: Avalon Accomodations(Small Inns, B&Bs) 5: Town of Placentia

  17. Under the Hood . . . meanwhile, back at the server

  18. Locations Server and Repository

  19. Conventional ‘Enumerative’ Methods Select locations in targeted business category. Calculate user-relative distances to selected locations. Sort selected locations by user-relative distance. Populate the user’s proximity with the ‘k’ nearest locations. Variations: (1) B, C, D, and then A; (2) Range-based selection Methods from Computational Geometry: Chevaz et al. (2001), Gaede and Guther (1998).

  20. The Problem (. . . and a Solution?)

  21. Linkcell TransformationGeographical Space  Relational Space

  22. Location-Aware Linkcell Method • Transforms mu’s position (47.523° N, 119.137° W) into a linkcell (N47W119). • Initiates a search spiral pivoting clockwise around mu’s linkcell: {N48W119, N48W118, N47W118, N46W118, N46W119, N46W120, N47W120, N48W120, …} • Permits large numbers of locations to be excluded as proximity portal candidates. • Requires an appropriate linkcell ‘size’ (S) to give superior performance.

  23. Linkcell Construction Location Li appears in relational table named for X  ‘N’[SL + 3*S]‘W’[EL + 2*S] For SL of 20°N, EL of 050°W, and S of 1°, we get: Relational Table for Li: N[20+3*1]W[50+2*1] = N23W052

  24. Proximity Generation: Performance Query Resolution Time (ms) Linkcell Size (S)

  25. Linkcell Performance Analyzer (LPA)

  26. S for Optimal Performance?

  27. Optimal Linkcell Size, S ‘Brute Force’ or Solve …. P(S) = 1 – (1 – S2/4A)N 0.6 . . . (A) . . . . for relational table name increments: ‘ N’[SL + 3*S]‘W’[EL + 2*S] = (for ex. N23W052) N is total number of locations, and CS is the number of linkcells of size, S, created from the N locations.

  28. Locations Repository: Scenario A

  29. Locations Repository: Scenario B

More Related