1 / 15

Mapping Objectives with NAMAs: Insights on Support and Divergence for Climate Action

This document explores the alignment and challenges between Annex 1 and non-Annex 1 countries regarding Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs). It highlights broad agreement on the significance of mitigation efforts in developing countries while revealing key divergences in priorities, particularly regarding finance transfer, technology, and research & development. The findings suggest implications for bi-lateral support systems and the operational effectiveness of multilateral institutions like the Green Climate Fund, emphasizing the need to reconcile different objectives for successful global climate action.

deiter
Télécharger la présentation

Mapping Objectives with NAMAs: Insights on Support and Divergence for Climate Action

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MappingobjectiveswithNAMAs [modified for online publication] Thank you! Mathias Friman and Björn-Ola Linnér Linköping University

  2. Support providers head offices (dark grey) A2 countries (light grey)

  3. Implications for 2015 consensus • identify convergence and divergence between Annex 1 and non-Annex 1 • Broad convergence on the importance of developing country mitigation • Greater divergence on other objectives for NAMAs • In general large expressed support for all non-mitigation goals. • In particular transfer of finance, but also the other goals, display a clear divergence in level of priority.

  4. Implications for implementation • Greatest difference between non-Annex 1 and support providers in: • Developing country mitigation • Transfer of technology • R&D • Convergence between non-Annex 1 and support providers on nationally defined sustainable development goals. • Implications for bi-lateral support. • The wide divergence on prioritized objectives is a challenge for multilateral support institutions, e.g. Green Climate Fund.

  5. ThankYou! Thank you!

More Related