1 / 4

Status Update draft- ietf - opsawg -large-flow-load-balancing IETF 90

Status Update draft- ietf - opsawg -large-flow-load-balancing IETF 90. Ram Krishnan, Lucy Yong, Anoop Ghanwani, Ning So, Bhumip Khasnabish , Sanjay Khanna. After WG Last Call. AD Review: Benoit Claise [Done] C larification regarding sampled vs non-sampled methods for measurement

delila
Télécharger la présentation

Status Update draft- ietf - opsawg -large-flow-load-balancing IETF 90

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status Updatedraft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancingIETF 90 Ram Krishnan, Lucy Yong, Anoop Ghanwani, Ning So, BhumipKhasnabish, Sanjay Khanna draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing

  2. After WG Last Call • AD Review: Benoit Claise [Done] • Clarification regarding sampled vs non-sampled methods for measurement • May be done in hardware or software • Addition of information model description for ECMP (similar to what was already there for link aggregation) • Bunch of edits draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing

  3. IETF Last Call • GenART Review: Martin Thomson [Done] • Clarification of cost of the scheme • Added an updated security section • Discuss the potential for a sophisticated attacker to consume PBR rules • SecdirReview: YoavNir and Chris Inacio [Done] • Similar comment to GenART regarding security • Operations Directorate Review: Carlos Pignataro [In Progress] • Some concerns regarding terminology in various parts of the draft • Concerns about lack of sufficient detail of the information model draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing

  4. Next Steps • Issue a revised version in a couple of weeks • Thanks to all the reviewers for their comments draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-balancing

More Related