1 / 34

EDUCATING THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE SUCCESS OF THE “NEW-TRADITIONAL” STUDENT

Presenters: Tom Abbott Dean of Libraries & Distance Learning, University of Maine at Augusta Victoria L. Bozzuto Dean of Continuing Education & Workforce Development, Gateway Community College Carol Anderson Provost, New England College of Business and Finance.

delphine
Télécharger la présentation

EDUCATING THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE SUCCESS OF THE “NEW-TRADITIONAL” STUDENT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presenters: Tom Abbott Dean of Libraries & Distance Learning, University of Maine at Augusta Victoria L. Bozzuto Dean of Continuing Education & Workforce Development, Gateway Community College Carol Anderson Provost, New England College of Business and Finance EDUCATING THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE SUCCESS OF THE “NEW-TRADITIONAL” STUDENT

  2. PRESENTATION OVERVIEW • Presenter Introductions • IPEDS Explained • Institutional IPEDS Data • What is a “New Traditional Student” (NTS)? • Measuring & Conveying Success of the NTS • Comments, Questions and Discussion

  3. PRESENTER INTRODUCTIONS • Tom Abbott • Carol Anderson • Victoria L. Bozzuto

  4. IPEDS EXPLAINED • Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) • Information extracted from annual survey data gathered by National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)

  5. IPEDS EXPLAINED • If schools participate in any type of federal student financial aid program, submission of IPEDS data is mandatory • ~6,700 institutions submit IPEDS data each year

  6. IPEDS EXPLAINED • IPEDS collects data in 7 institutional areas: • Institutional characteristics • Institutional prices • Enrollment • Student financial aid • Degrees & certificates conferred • Student persistence and success • Institutional human and fiscal resources • What about Institutional “identity”?

  7. IPEDS EXPLAINED • IPEDS has 2 measures of “Student Persistence and Success”: • First Year Retention Rates • Graduation Rates (Transfer out can be factored in) • http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/

  8. IPEDS EXPLAINED

  9. IPEDS EXPLAINED

  10. INSTITUTIONAL IPEDS DATA • Does the public care (or even know) about current IPEDS data? • Are the current IPED measures of success (first year retention and graduation within 150% of the expected time) too narrow, or even valid?

  11. Gateway Community CollegeCase Study

  12. INSTITUTIONAL IPEDS DATA

  13. GATEWAY CC IPEDS DATA • Unique factors not evident in IPEDS: • Only looks at about 800+ GCC students out of >7,000. • Most students in Allied Health and Nursing need 1-2 years or prerequisite work in order to apply for their program (most graduate, yet are seen as failures because of 4 years in school). • Students may only enter to get 2 or 3 courses, they leave after completing them – these are “failures”?

  14. “Traditional” Gateway Student • 60% Female; 40% Male • Average age 28 • 66% part-time; 34% full time • Only 12.5% enroll in Gateway within 12 months of high school graduation • 43% minority representation in student body • >80% require developmental course work in English and/or math upon entry

  15. GATEWAY CC IPEDS DATA • Alternate measures of success for GCC: • Students who achieve stated goals. • Students who successfully complete. educational programs regardless of timespan. • Feedback from graduates and employers.

  16. New England College of Business and Finance Case Study

  17. NECB IPEDS DATA

  18. NECB IPEDS DATA • NECB students are part-time, working adults. IPEDS data requires reporting of First-Time, Full-Time Fall Enrollments. • IPEDS data does not reflect the long history of the college and evolution from a training institute in the banking industry to a graduate degree-granting institution.

  19. NECB IPEDS DATA • 2009 • Degree elevation to Bachelor’s and Master’s programs • Title IV Funding first timein College’s history • Unique factors not evident in IPEDS: • 31 Comparison institutions in 16 different states – none of which are in New England • 75% of NECBs population work for partner organizations. Partner goals and objectives do not align with IPEDS.

  20. “Traditional” NECB Student • 70% Female; 30% Male • 30 years of age and older • Employed in entry level to mid-level management jobs • Partial/Full employer-paid tuition • Raising children • Complete ASBA in 5+ years; • BSBA students tracking at 4-6 years

  21. NECB IPEDS DATA • Alternate measures of success for NECB: • Students who achieve their academic goals, whether it is completing a course, a certificate, or a degree programs. • Feedback from students and/or employers that learning outcomes align with career and organizational goals.

  22. University of Maine at Augusta (UMA) • Case Study

  23. INSTITUTIONAL IPEDS DATA

  24. Other UMA Comparisons: • UMA lags behind peers in the 4-year (100%) and 6-year (150%) graduation rates • We catch up in the 8-year (200%) graduation rate • Our part-time student retention is 14% ahead • Possible Interpretations?

  25. UMA IPEDS DATA Unique factors not evident in IPEDS: • UMA in transition to well-established baccalaureate institution • 41% increase in baccalaureate students since 2007 • Age is 32, 80% working • 73% are women – many single parents • Many students need some remedial course work

  26. UMA’s “new” student profile • Covering Maine with courses and programs • 5063 head count • Non-residential • 38% of all UMA students take online course(s) • While juggling work, kids, home, elderly parents and financial difficulties • Most can’t consider full-time

  27. UMA IPEDS DATA What matters to the students? • Can I get the course(s) I need? • Will my financial aid be available? • How much will gasoline cost? • What about child care? • Can I talk with someone who can help me situation?

  28. UMA IPEDS DATA What really matters to us at UMA? • Persistence but on our students’ terms • Does a UMA education make a difference? • Communitycontributions • Better life • Impact on employer • Staying connected after gradation? • Does the experience help UMA improve ?

  29. INSTITUTIONAL IPEDS DATA • Can you actually compare institutions of apparently similar type? • Location (urban, suburban, rural). • Demographics (race, age, income, gender, quality of feeder school systems, level of state financial support, infrastructure & physical resources). • Faculty & staff makeup (unionized, non-unionized, state policies and regulations)\ • Residential versus non-residential

  30. WHAT IS A NEW-TRADITIONAL STUDENT? • Has there ever genuinely been an average college student? • Given the impact of the economic climate, college students now encompass the entire demographic spectrum.

  31. MEASURING & CONVEYING SUCCESS OF THE New Traditional Student • More relevant ways to gauge success: • Measures of Learning • Narrative Reports on Student Success during and after Graduation • Reports on Students’ Service • How do we get this information in front of the public? • Disclosure Web Pages • Feature New Traditional Student in their own category • Add concept & data to NEASC annual reports

  32. Discussion • Comments • Ideas • Where to go from here?

  33. MEASURING & CONVEYING SUCCESS of the New Traditional Student How does YOUR institution measure, gauge and report student success?

  34. Wrap-up

More Related