1 / 31

Detecting Digital Image Forgeries Using Sensor Pattern Noise

Detecting Digital Image Forgeries Using Sensor Pattern Noise. Jan Lukas, jessica Fridrich and Miroslav Goljan. presented by: Lior Paz. Abstract. Use the camera’s sensor pattern noise in order to link pictures to the camera by which they were taken.

delta
Télécharger la présentation

Detecting Digital Image Forgeries Using Sensor Pattern Noise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Detecting Digital Image Forgeries Using Sensor Pattern Noise Jan Lukas, jessica Fridrich and Miroslav Goljan presented by: Lior Paz

  2. Abstract • Use the camera’s sensor pattern noise in order to link pictures to the camera by which they were taken. • Use this noise pattern in order to identify areas in the image that were manipulated. • photomontage • cropping

  3. Other possible solutions • Watermark • Needs a world wide standard • Needs cooperation from the image taker • Effective only in a controlled environment. • Embed information in image file • Needs cooperation from the image taker • Easy to manipulate

  4. Where other methods fail • Shadow analyzing – poor lighting conditions • Copy Move Forge – photomontage from another image • Statistical methods – Results are not accurate

  5. Noise • The pattern noise has 2 main components • Fixed Pattern Noise (FPN) • pixel to pixel difference when not exposed to light • Additive noise • Photo-Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU) • the dominant part of the pattern noise • multiplicative noise

  6. 1. Fixed Pattern Noise • The FPN is the pixel to pixel difference when the sensor is not exposed to light • In most digital cameras this difference is equalized by subtracting a dark frame (mask) from the picture. -2 0 3 -5 - = 0 0 0 0 -2 0 3 -5

  7. 2. Photo-Response Non-Uniformity • The PRNU is a multiplicative noise that derives from: • optics • dust particles on the lens • PNU – Pixel Non Uniformity

  8. Pixel Non Uniformity • The PNU is cause by the different sensibility of pixels to light. • not dependent on temperature • not dependent on time • Thus, if we capture this noise pattern, we can make a distinctive link between a camera and its photos

  9. The Sensor’s Output yij = fij ( xij + nij ) + cij + ij x = xij clean image without any noise n = nij random shot noise  = ij additive noise - read-out noise c = cij additive noise - dark current ( FPN ) y = yij digitized output of the sensor fij multiplicative noise ( PRNU )

  10. The signal Post process pij = T(yij ,N(yij), i, j) • T = Transformations on the sensor’s outputsignal • Demosaicking • Color correction • Gama correction • White balance • Etc. • N = Neighborhood of pixel yij(e.g. of size 5x5)

  11. Flat Fielding • An algorithm that suppresses the pattern noise • Correct FPN with dark frame • Divide by a flat field frame obtained by averaging images of a uniformly lit scene. • The algorithm must work on yij (the raw sensor data) and will not work on pij • Common for astronomical imaging • Very difficult (thus not done) to achieve in consumer digital cameras

  12. Other Sensors • All imaging sensors are made of semiconductors in quite similar techniques • CCD, CMOS, JFET and other sensors have similar noise pattern properties

  13. Obtain Camera’s PNU • pc= the PNU of camera C • p(k) , (k = 1..n) set of images taken by C • F = denoising filter • n(k) = p(k) – F(p(k)) the noise residue of image k • pc = average( n(k)), k = 1..n)

  14. Image & Camera Link • How to decide whether image Y was taken by camera C ? • calculate the correlation between: • Image noise: Y – F(Y) • camera pattern Pc • c(Y)=corr(Y-F(Y),Pc) = • || || is the l2 norm:

  15. Result with TIFF Images Correlations of noise from Olympus C765 images in TIFF format with 9 reference patterns

  16. Result with JPEG Images Correlations under JPEG

  17. Result with Resized Images & Gamma Correction Correlations of noise from Canon G2 JPEG images resized to 1600x1200 pixels with gamma correction

  18. Conclusion • This method of linking images to the camera from which they were taken overcomes: • Low resolution images • JPEG compression • Linear & non-linear actions : • Brightness/Contrast • Histogram operations • Gamma correction

  19. Forgery Detection • How can we use the sensor pattern noise in order to detect regions that have been tampered? ?

  20. Forgery Identification • Obtain camera’s PNU (fingerprint) • Obtain photo’s PNU • Find regions lacking the pattern noise

  21. Region Of Interest • Let R be our Region Of Interest (ROI), a suspected region in an image.

  22. Forgery Detection • In order to check the ROI authenticity we will correlate between the ROI’s noise pattern from the image, and the same region in the reference pattern.

  23. Forgery Detection – cont. • Now we will calculate the correlations of other regions of the same shape and size from the same images and others with Pc(R). • (n(Qk) , Pc(R)) for regions Qk, k= 1...NR • Qkis a sample of regions that don’t contain the reference pattern Pc(R). Q3 Q2 R R Q1

  24. Forgery Detection – cont. • Model the distribution of the correlations with the generalized Gaussian distribution with the cumulative distribution function G(x) #Qk Q3 Q2 Q1  (n(Qk) , Pc(R))

  25. Forgery Detection – cont. • p=1-G((n(R) , Pc(R)) • R was tampered if p>=10-3 and not otherwise #Qk  (n(Qk) , Pc(R))

  26. Forgery Detection – cont. • If the ROI was detected as tempered • Apply the same algorithm on other Regions from the same image which are disjoint from R and have the same number of pixels and similar histogram. • If all of those regions are decided as non-tempered, R was tempered. Q3 Q2 Q1

  27. Automatic ROI Identification • A region that was tempered will have a lower correlation with it’s appropriate region in the Sensor Pattern • Method: One way to find a suspicious region to be inspected is to use sliding square blocks and compute their correlation.

  28. Automatic ROI Identification • Problem: This will only work if the tempered area is significantly larger than the sliding block. • Solution: Sliding blocks of different sizes and shapes.

  29. Auto. Identification Algorithm • Prepare N blocks of different types • For each block type correlate the image noise residual with the camera reference pattern in overlapping blocks. ( , ) • For each block type select m blocks with the smallest correlation.

  30. Auto. Identification Algorithm • Construct the mask B from these blocks • Choose the threshold t: • For each pixel p let t(p)=# of blocks covering p (step 3) • threshold t = median value of t(p) for all pixels p • ROI R = {p|t(p)>t} • apply the ROI verification algorithm.

  31. To sum up... • Uses of the Sensor Pattern: • Link between an image and the camera that took it. • Distinguish if a region in an image was distorted or manipulated. • Distinguish automatically if an image is authentic or not.

More Related