1 / 11

BQSI/MB SUBSCRIPTION AGENCIES SURVEY RESULTS

BQSI/MB SUBSCRIPTION AGENCIES SURVEY RESULTS. SUBSCRIPTION AGENCIES SURVEY REPORT. We asked BQSI/MB participating libraries to evaluate their Subscription Agencies on the following criteria: quality of services, support of electronic resources and usability.

dena
Télécharger la présentation

BQSI/MB SUBSCRIPTION AGENCIES SURVEY RESULTS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BQSI/MB SUBSCRIPTION AGENCIES SURVEY RESULTS

  2. SUBSCRIPTION AGENCIES SURVEY REPORT • We asked BQSI/MB participating libraries to evaluate their Subscription Agencies on the following criteria: quality of services, support of electronic resources and usability. • Suggested grades were 1-strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-fair, 4-agree, 5-strongly agree. • For usability, the grades were: 1-strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-undecided, 4-agree, 5-strongly agree. • We received responses from 14 members, four use SWETS, five use EBSCO, and five use BASCH subscription services. • Based on the evaluation of the survey results, in the usability criteria BASCH received the best grades followed by EBSCO and SWETS. • In the quality criteria BASCH received the best grades followed by SWETS and EBSCO received the lowest score. • In the support of electronic access criteria the best grades were received BASCH followed by SWETS and EBSCO received the lowest score in this category. • In the usability criteria, BASCH received the best grades followed by SWETS and EBSCO received the lowest grades. • Many participants mentioned that service is based on the customer service representative assigned to the institution. Some participants did not have experiences to share as they do not subscribe to electronic journals. We would need more participants to make conclusive results regarding subscription agencies quality of services.

  3. BASCH QUALITY

  4. SWETS QUALITY

  5. EBSCO QUALITY

  6. BASCH USABILITY

  7. EBSCO USABILITY

  8. SWETS USABILITY

  9. EBSCO SUPPORT OF ELECTRONIC ACCESS

  10. SWETS SUPPORT OF ELECTRONIC ACCESS

  11. BASCH SUPPORT OF ELECTRONIC ACCESS

More Related