1 / 10

Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission

Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission. Authors:. Date: 2010-11-08. Abstract. MU-MIMO is a key technique to attain at least 1 Gbps throughput at MAC SAP for Multi-STA. But, the gain of MU-MIMO maybe shrink significantly due to mismatching of the lengths of co-transmission STA’s PSDU.

dena
Télécharger la présentation

Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission Authors: Date: 2010-11-08

  2. Abstract • MU-MIMO is a key technique to attain at least 1 Gbps throughput at MAC SAP for Multi-STA. • But, the gain of MU-MIMO maybe shrink significantly due to mismatching of the lengths of co-transmission STA’s PSDU. • A sustainable frame format is proposed here to exploit the gain of MU-MIMO against the mismatching problem for co-transmission STAs

  3. The mismatching problem • There exists a mismatching problem for MU-MIMO transmission for 802.11ac due to mismatching the lengths of co-transmission STA’s PSDU. • An example is given here: • STA1’s transmission rate is 500Mbps and 400Mbps for SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO transmission, respectively • STA2’s transmission rate is assumed as same as that of STA1 for simple. • PSDU data length of STA1 is 2000 kb, therefore 5ms for MU-MIMO transmission • PSDU data length of STA2 is 800 kb, therefore 2ms for MU-MIMO transmission STA 1 STA1-PSDU STA 2 STA2-PSDU

  4. Transmission schemes for Multi-STA with mismatching lengths of their PSDU • Direct transmission utilizing MU-MIMO • The LENGTH field in L-SIG is set according the maximum among the lengths of these multi-STA’s PSDU • The LENGTH field in each STA’s VHT-SIG-B is set according the actual length of the STA’s PSDU • The transmission duration for the example is 5ms • Direct transmission utilizing SU-MIMO for each STA in turn • The transmission duration for the example is 5.6mswithout accounting for the overheads of preamble, SIFS, etc. STA1-PSDU STA2-PSDU

  5. An efficient transmission scheme based on a new frame format • A new frame format with sustainable VHT-segment proposed here: • A series of VHT-segments with the maximum of 4 can be concatenated together to form the whole frame. • Each VHT-segment consists of VHT-SIG-A, VHT-STF, VHT-LTFs, VHT-SIG-B and VHT data

  6. An efficient transmission scheme based on a new frame format (con’t) • A new frame format with sustainable VHT-segment proposed here: • The LENGTH field in L-SIG is set according to the total length of the whole frame consisted of all VHT-segments

  7. An efficient transmission scheme based on a new frame format (con’t) • A new frame format with sustainable VHT-segment proposed here: • Each STA’s NSTS field in VHT-SIG-A implies whether its PSDU has been ended or not

  8. An efficient transmission scheme based on a new frame format (con’t) • A new frame format with sustainable VHT-segment proposed here: • The length field in VHT-SIG-B of each VHT-segment indicates the actual length of VHT-data in current VHT-segment.

  9. Gain and Conclusion • The transmission duration for the former example is 4.4ms, therefore a gain of more than 10% can be obtained. • Although the transmission scheme based on the proposed frame format is somewhat like MU-TXOP, but it is superior to MU-TXOP due to omitting SIFS, L-STF and L-LTF. • Nevertheless, TXOP/MU-TXOP isn’t substitutable in providing continuous transmission with longer duration (for example more than 5.4ms).

  10. References • Specification Framework for TGac, IEEE 802.11-09/0992r15, September 2010

More Related