1 / 9

Grabbing the Golden Ring

The East Central Kansas Public Health Coalition, involving counties like Chase, Coffey, and others, embarked on a journey of regional collaboration in public health. Beginning in 2008 with STD prevention efforts, the coalition has expanded its scope to address community health through various projects, including the NACCHO CHACHIP Demonstration Site initiative. Key deliverables, such as the Community Health Profile and Improvement Plan, leverage local resources, involve community engagement, and address social determinants of health while navigating challenges like recruitment and funding.

denali
Télécharger la présentation

Grabbing the Golden Ring

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Grabbing the Golden Ring Holding on for all its worth! NACCHO Demonstration Grant East Central Kansas Public Health Coalition

  2. CHACHIP Sites

  3. Approach #3: Two or more LHDs with formal agreement • East Central Kansas Public Health Coalition: • Chase • Coffey • Franklin • Greenwood • Lyon • Morris • Osage • Wabaunsee

  4. What brought us to this point? • Initiated regional cooperation through preparedness • 2008 MLC I – • First Regional Project on STD prevention/services • Broadened formal agreement • 2009 NACCHO Preparation for Accreditation Project • 2010 MLC III & Kansas Pilot for Accreditation • Introduction / training on assessment and standards • 2011 NACCHO CHACHIP Demonstration Site

  5. Project Deliverables • Community Health Profile • Community Health Improvement Plan • Process Report that includes: • Assessment Model • Engagement of Community Members • Broad Public Health System Representation • Address Social Determinants of Health • Quality improvement and Quality planning techniques • Leverage local, regional, state resources

  6. Where we are now: • Defined Community: People who live, work, and play in our eight counties. • Formed Core Team: 8 HD reps, 8 community reps: • three hospital, two extension, one minister, one RPC/mental health, one education • Selected CHA model: MAPP • (and will incorporate others - Change Tool, ACHI, PACE-EH) • Scheduled Monthly Core Team and Standards meetings • Completing Circle of Involvement for region • Planning regional visioning session for November

  7. Anticipated Barriers/Issues • Recruitment: Explaining “why regional” to local constituents • Travel and staff time commitment • Complexity of regional involvement and assessment • Tailoring plans to be meaningful both regionally and locally and in some cases, at the agency level • Financial costs • Naysayers and government leaders who aren’t supportive of public health

  8. Benefits of Project • National Experts provide training and assistance/$35,000 • Twelve sites to share experiences and issues • Spin off projects • Shared responsibility and expenses across the counties to lessen the burden on any one HD • Pooled data increases validity/consistency • Timeline and expectations to keep us moving forward • Reduces burden on other agencies that provide services regionally • Opportunity to increase recognized value of PH among community members

  9. Questions?

More Related