1 / 19

The ABC’s of PLC and RTI

The ABC’s of PLC and RTI. Shanna Brooks NCESD Literacy Specialist. Resources:. Buffum, A., Mattos, M., & Weber, C. (2009). Pyramid Response to Intervention. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Callender, Wayne (2009) Partners for Learning, Boise, ID

deo
Télécharger la présentation

The ABC’s of PLC and RTI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The ABC’s of PLC and RTI Shanna Brooks NCESD Literacy Specialist

  2. Resources: • Buffum, A., Mattos, M., & Weber, C. (2009). Pyramid Response to Intervention. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree • Callender, Wayne (2009) Partners for Learning, Boise, ID • DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T.(2006). Learning by Doing: A Handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree • Mattos, M. (2009). Pyramid Response to Intervention: Part I Webinar. Solution-Tree.com • Using Response to Intervention (RTI) for Washington’s Students (2006), Dr. Terry Bergeson, OSPI

  3. A symbiotic relationship: a cooperative, mutually beneficial relationship between two people or groups Webster

  4. Professional Learning Community: • To Lead, Serve, and Support the Educational Community • A PLC is composed of collaborative teams whose members work interdependently to achieve common goals linked to the purpose of learning for all. DuFour - 2006

  5. The Big Ideas of PLC: • Focus on Learning • Build a collaborative culture • Focus on Results Mattos - 2009

  6. The PLC 4 Critical Questions: • What do we want all students to learn? • How will we know when they have learned it? • How will we respond when some students do not learn? • How will we respond when some students have learned? DuFour - 2006

  7. For all students to learn, we must: • Start with a highly effective research-based core instruction. • Systematically identify students who are not succeeding in our core program through valid assessments. • Provide additional time and support to struggling students with targeted interventions. Mattos - 2009

  8. A Cultural Shift: • Ongoing Adult Learning • Deliberate Teamwork • “Our Kids” • Data Driven Decisions • Leverage Resources

  9. Response to Intervention: • IDEIA, 2004 • The reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 2004 allowed RTI to be utilized as a component of an evaluation for special education eligibility.

  10. Response to Intervention: • Washington State RTI Manual • http://www.k12.wa.us/RTI/Resources/RTIManual.aspx

  11. The Washington Model • Use all school resources to help all students learn • Use research-based programs and instructions • Focus on the core program • Universally screen students so that none fall through the cracks • Use a multi-tiered approach to meeting student needs • Use data decision-making • Monitor progress often Washington State Board of Education (2006) As cited in Pyramid Response to Intervention, Buffum (2009)

  12. Essential Characteristics of RTI: • Collective responsibility • Quality core instruction • Universal screening and diagnostic assessment • Research-based interventions • Progress monitoring • Quality problem solving • Certain access to appropriate instruction Mattos-2009

  13. Use all school resources to help all students learn Use research-based programs and instructions Focus on the core program Universally screen students so that none fall through the cracks Use a multitiered approach to meeting student needs Use data decision-making Monitor progress often Collective responsibility Quality core instruction Universal screening and diagnostic assessment Research-based interventions Progress monitoring Quality problem solving Certain access to appropriate instruction How well do we line up?

  14. Three-Tier Model of School Supports: • 5% of your students should be here. • 15% of your students should be here. • 80% of your students should be here.

  15. Tier 1 Benchmark: • Designed for most • Promotes 1 year growth in 1 year time • Minimum time daily (i.e., 90 min) • Ensures students across different classrooms receive same content Callender - 2009

  16. Tier 2 Strategic: • 30-45 min. daily • Small group • In addition to the core • Targets specific skill deficits • Can be part of core or supplemental to core Callender - 2009

  17. Tier 3 Intensive Intervention: • Is comprehensive within content area • Designed to accelerate if used properly • 60 minute or more daily • Smaller group • Generally replaces the core • May also need to be supplemented Callender - 2009

  18. Assessments: • Universal Screening Tools • DIBELS, AIMSweb • Diagnostic Assessments • CORE, DAR, QRI, CBA’s • Progress Monitoring • DIBELS, NWEA MAPS, Read Naturally

  19. The A B C’s: • Access to quality teaching and learning for every student • Build a collaborative culture of professionals • Communicate & Celebrate Success

More Related