1 / 14

Background

Background. Neural organization of speech perception difficult to characterize 1 st hypothesis: based on auditory cortex (auditory language comprehension disorders, left STG lesions) Challenged by 2 discoveries

derek-levine
Télécharger la présentation

Background

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Background • Neural organization of speech perception difficult to characterize • 1st hypothesis: based on auditory cortex (auditory language comprehension disorders, left STG lesions) • Challenged by 2 discoveries • Deficits in speech sound perception contribute minimally to auditory comprehension in Wernicke’s aphasia • Destruction of left STG leads to deficits in speech production (not auditory comprehension) • Deficits in syllable discrimination from frontoparietal damage • Syllable discrimination and word comprehension doubly dissociated (can have one without the other)

  2. Paradox and Article Goal • First imaging studies: • Passive listening highlights ST regions bilaterally • Syllable discrimination activates left STG and left IF lobe • Paradox remains • Damage to left regions causes mainly deficits in speech production (not auditory comprehension issues) • In this article we will: • Describe and extend a dual-stream model of speech processing that resolves paradox • Outline central components • Discuss model assumptions and relevant evidence

  3. Task Dependence and Definitions • Neural organization of speech processing is task dependent => must define task of interest • Speech perception and speech recognition doubly dissociate (can have one without the other) • Speech processing = any task involving aurally presented speech • Speech perception = sublexical tasks (e.g. syllable discrimination) • Speech recognition = mapping of acoustic signals to mental lexicon • Not necessarily a single route to recognition • Perception tasks involve executive control and working memory

  4. Dual-stream model

  5. Ventral stream: sound to meaning • [Dorsal stream: sound to action] • Parallel computations and bilateral organization • Multi-time resolution processing • STS crucial to phonological-level processing • Lexical, semantic and grammatical linkages

  6. Parallel routes

  7. Lexical phonological networks in STS

  8. Dorsal stream: sound to action • Less agreement on role of auditory dorsal stream • Spatial hearing, “where” function • Interface with motor system • Need for auditory-motor integration • Learning to speak is a motor task • Neural mechanism for mapping sounds to speech gestures • Generation of sensory representation of new words • Continues to function in adults • Evidence for a sensorimotor dorsal stream • Left lesions (conduction aphasia: phonemic errors but comprehends) • Functional imaging (next figure)

  9. Auditory-motor task for speech

  10. Summary and future perspectives • Acoustic speech network must interface with • Conceptual systems • Motor-articulatory systems • Above basic concept accounts for an array of fundamental observations • It also fits with similar proposals in the visual and somatosensory domains • Might be a reflection of a more general principle of sensory systems organization • Future work • Specify within-stream details • Empirical work to test hypotheses • How neural models map to linguistic and psycholiguistic models

  11. Operculum

More Related