1 / 26

Fuzzy DL, Fuzzy SWRL, Fuzzy Carin (report from visit to Athens)

Fuzzy DL, Fuzzy SWRL, Fuzzy Carin (report from visit to Athens). M.Vacura VŠE Praha (used materials by G . Stoilos , NTU Athens). Description Logics. Concept and Role Oriented Concepts (Unary): Man, Tall, Human, Brain Roles (Binary): hasChild, hasColor

derora
Télécharger la présentation

Fuzzy DL, Fuzzy SWRL, Fuzzy Carin (report from visit to Athens)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fuzzy DL, Fuzzy SWRL, Fuzzy Carin(report from visit to Athens) M.Vacura VŠE Praha (used materials by G.Stoilos, NTU Athens)

  2. Description Logics • Concept and Role Oriented • Concepts (Unary): Man, Tall, Human, Brain • Roles (Binary): hasChild, hasColor • Individuals: John, Object1, Italy, Monday

  3. Concepts • Concepts: • Universal ⊤ • Empty ⊥ • Atomic/primitive concepts (concept names) • Complex concepts (terms) • Concept Constructors: • , ⊔, ⊓, , , ,  • ( Animal ⊓ Rational)

  4. Axioms • Concept Axioms – T box (terminology) • Woman  Person ⊓ Female • Parent  Person ⊓ hasChild.Person • Role Axioms – R box • hasSon  hasChild • Trans(hasOffspring) • Instance Axioms (Assertions) – A box • Bob: Parent • (Bob,Helen):hasChild

  5. Typology of DLs • Constructors of Description logics AL • Negation:  A (A primitive) • Conjunction: (A ⊓ B) • Universal quantification: R.C • Limited existential quantification: R.⊤

  6. Typology of DLs • Constructors of Description logics ALU • (A ⊔ B) (disjunction) • Constructors of Description logics ALE • R.C (full existencial quantification) • Constructors of Description logics ALN • (n C) , (n C) (numerical restriction) • Constructors of Description logics ALC • ( A) (full negation)

  7. Typology of DLs • Description logics S • ALCR+= ALC + transitive roles axioms. • Trans(hasOffspring) • Description logics SH • SH = S + role hiearchy axioms. • hasSon  hasChild • Description logics SHf • SHf = SH + role functional axioms. • Func(R)

  8. Typology of DLs • Description logics SHO • SHO = SH + nominal axioms. • C  {a} • Description logics SHOI • SHO = SH + inverse role axioms. • Description logics SHOIN • SHOIN = SHOI + numerical restrictions.

  9. Typology of DLs • Description logics SHOIQ • SHOIQ = SHOI + qualified numerical restrictions. • Description logics SROIQ • SROIQ = SHOIQ + extended role axioms • disjoint roles, reflexive and irreflexive roles, negated role assertions (A box), complex role inclusion axioms, local reflexivity axioms.

  10. Important DLs • ALC – base DL • SHOIN – OWL DL • SROIQ – OWL DL 1.1 • (Support for datatypes)

  11. Uncertainty and Applications • Several Applications from Industry and Academic face uncertain imprecision: • Multimedia Processing (Image Analysis and Annotation) • Medical Diagnosis • Geospatial Applications • Information Retrieval • Sensor Readings • Decision Making

  12. Uncertainty • Imprecision (Possibility Theory) • Vagueness (Fuzzy Set Theory) • Randomness (Probability Theory)

  13. Fuzzy Set Theory • An object belongs to a set to a degree between 0 and 1. (membership degree). • Tall(George)=0.7 • A pair of objects belongs to a relation to a degree between 0 and 1. (membership degree). • Far(Prague,Paris)=0.6

  14. Fuzzy Set Theoretic Operations • Complement: c(x) • c(x)=1-x • Intersection: t(x,y) • t(x,y)=min(x,y), t(x,y)=max(0,x+y-1) • t-norm Godel, Lukasiewicz • Union: u(x,y) • u(x,y)=max(x,y), u(x,y)=min(1,x+y) • s-norm Godel, Lukasiewicz • Implication: J(x,y) • J(x,y)=max(1-x,y), J(x,y)=min(1,1-x+y) • Kleene-Dienes, Lukasiewicz

  15. Fuzzy DLs • Syntax Extensions • A box • Fuzzy assertions: DLAssertion {, , >, <} [0,1] • George:Tall  0.7, • (Prague, Paris):Far  0.6

  16. Complex concepts • Bob:Tall  0.8 • Bob:Athletic  0.6 • Bob:(Athletic ⊓Tall)  t(0.6,0.8)

  17. Reasoning • Usually DL Reasoning is done with tableaux algorithms. • Tableaux algorithms can be extended to deal with fuzziness • NTU Athens - Implementation for fKD-SHIN • Reasoner FIRE

  18. Future • Fuzzy T box • <C D>  0,6 • Fuzzy R box • <R S>  0,3

  19. Fuzzy SWRL

  20. SWRL • A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML • (undecidable) • RuleML – Rule Markup Language • (www.ruleml.org)

  21. Fuzzy SWRL • OWL – A box: • OWL asserions can include a specification of the “degree” (a truth value between 0 and 1) of confidence with which we assert that an individual (resp. pair of individuals) is an instance of a given class (resp.property). • RuleML • atoms can include a “weight” (a truth value between 0 and 1) that represents the “importance” of the atom in a rule.

  22. Fuzzy SWRL • Fuzzy rule assertions: • antecedent → consequent • parent(?x, ?p) ∧ Happy(?p) → Happy(?x) *0.8, • EyebrowsRaised(?a)*0.9 ∧ MouthOpen(?a)*0.8 → Happy(?a)

  23. Fuzzy Carin

  24. Fuzzy Carin • Carin combines the description logic ALCNR with Horn Rules. • Fuzzy Carin adds fuzziness to Carin. • (decidable)

  25. Fuzzy Carin

  26. END

More Related