1 / 6

Damages for Dignitary Torts

Damages for Dignitary Torts. What is a dignitary tort? Torts that assault or impair our dignity but don ’ t necessarily cause physical or pecuniary harm. Examples: Assault, Defamation, False Imprisonment, IIED, NIED, Malicious prosecution, Invasion of privacy

derry
Télécharger la présentation

Damages for Dignitary Torts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Damages for Dignitary Torts What is a dignitary tort? Torts that assault or impair our dignity but don’t necessarily cause physical or pecuniary harm. Examples: Assault, Defamation, False Imprisonment, IIED, NIED, Malicious prosecution, Invasion of privacy As with pain & suffering damages, difficult valuation issues arise Levka v. City of Chicago (p. 170) P sues for emotional distress resulting from illegal search after misdemeanor arrest. Awarded $50,000 for emotional distress but 7th Circuit remits to $25,000.

  2. What could Levka’s attorney have done differently to convince the appellate court of her emotional distress? • Focus on plaintiff’s harm • Emphasize particular frailty • Reframe inferences court drew from evidence • Bolster psychological evidence • Focus on defendant’s conduct • Try to frame it as more outrageous than court characterized it

  3. How courts generally approach damages with dignitary torts: • In these types of torts, courts generally attempt to gauge damages in light of the two factors we just discussed: 1) Plaintiff’s injury (especially if particular frailty) and 2) Defendant’s conduct (how outrageous?) • These are applied as a sliding scale • Are there problems w/ focusing on D’s conduct? • Are there problems w/ focusing on P’s frailties?

  4. How relevant are other jury verdicts to determining “excessiveness”? The Levka court engaged in “remittitur”– a practice where district or appellate courts order a reduction in damages because they are “grossly excessive.” Most courts engage in this practice at some point and they have a lot of discretion. Court usually gives the option of a new trial so P can choose between new trial and reduction of damages. “Grossly excessive” determinations & “comparator” verdicts Some courts, like Levka, are starting to use comparator verdicts to make remittitur decisions. Are such verdicts relevant to the issue of excessiveness? What kind of mathematical precision do we want judges to engage in here?

  5. Damage awards for constitutional violations – the rule in Carey v. Piphus • Why does P only get $1 in damages? • Why won’t SCT presume damages for a procedural due process violation (or for any constitutional violation for that matter)?

  6. The Value of Constitutional Rights? • The Court dances around the question of whether constitutional rights have an innate value – do they? • If so, shouldn’t we compensate for the mere violation of a right? • What issues arise if we compensate for a right violation without actual damages (like those the plaintiff suffered in Levka)?

More Related