1 / 37

Module 1 Introduction and Motivation

Module 1 Introduction and Motivation. „If I invent another programming language, its name will contain the letter X.“. (N. Wirth, Software Pioniere Konferenz, Bonn 2001). Google Indicator. A history of „Language“. 2 x (Descartes). l x.2x (Church). (LAMBDA (x) (* 2 x)) (McCarthy).

devin
Télécharger la présentation

Module 1 Introduction and Motivation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Module 1Introduction and Motivation

  2. „If I invent another programming language, its name will contain the letter X.“ (N. Wirth, Software Pioniere Konferenz, Bonn 2001)

  3. Google Indicator

  4. A history of „Language“

  5. 2 x (Descartes)

  6. lx.2x (Church)

  7. (LAMBDA (x) (* 2 x)) (McCarthy)

  8. W3C <?xml version=„1.0“> <lambda-term> <varlist> <var>x</var></varlist> <expression> <application> <expr><const>*</const></expr> <arg-list><expr><const>2</const></expr> <expr><var>x</var></expr> </arg-list> </application> </expression> </lambda-term>

  9. What can the Web do for you? • Download + show HTML Documents • Forms • Pre-compiled point queries • Updates in specific Web application • Everywhere, any time, platform independent • Simple keyword search (Google) • Good for human-human, human-machine communication • Scalability in the Millions of Users

  10. What the Web cannot do? • Applications do not understand HTML • Machine-Machine communication difficult • Distributed Updates • Long transactions (business processes) • Powerful Queries • Where can I find a used car for CHF 1000 • Scalability in the Millions of Machines

  11. Design Principles of W3C • Everybody is autonomous • Everybody can participate (open) • All Standards are compatible • All Standards are downwards compatible • Platform- and vendor independance

  12. A little bit of history • Database world • 1970 relational databases • 1990 nested relational model and object oriented databases • 1995 semi-structured databases • Documentsworld • 1974 SGML (Structured Generalized Markup Language) • 1990 HTML (Hypertext Markup Language) • 1992 URL (Universal Resource Locator) • Data + documents = information • 1996 XML(Extended Markup Language) • URI (Universal Resource Identifier)

  13. What is XML? • The Extensible Markup Language (XML) is the universal format for structured documents and data on the Web. • Base specifications: • XML 1.0, W3C Recommendation Feb '98 • Namespaces, W3C Recommendation Jan '99

  14. XML Data Example <bookyear=“1967”> <title>The politics of experience </title> <author> <firstname>Ronald</firstname> <lastname>Laing</lastname> </author> </book> Elements • Syntax, no abstract model • Documents, elements and attributes • Tree-based, nested, hierarchically organized structure

  15. XML vs. relational data • Relational data • Killer application: banking industry • Invented as a mathematically clean abstract data model • Philosophy: schema first, then data • Never had a standard syntax for data • Strict rules for data normalization, flat tables • Order is irrelevant, textual data supported but not primary goal • XML • First killer application: publishing industry • Invented as a syntax for data, only later an abstract data model • Philosophy: data and schemas should not be correlated, data can exist with or without schema, or with multiple schemas • No data normalization, flexibility is a must, nesting is good • Order may be very important, textual data support a primary goal

  16. Reasons for the XML success • XML is a generaldata representation format • XML is human readable • XML is machine readable • XML is internationalized (UNICODE) • XML is platform independent • XML is vendor independent • XML is endorsed by the World Wide Web Consortium • XML is not a new technology • XML is not only a data representation format, it’s a full infrastructure of technologies

  17. XML as a family of technologies • XML Information Set • XML Schema • XML Query • The Extensible Stylesheet Transformation Language (XSLT) • XLink, XPointer • XML Forms • XML Protocol • XML Encryption • XML Signature • Others • … almost all the pieces needed for a good XML-based information hub

  18. Overview of XML Technologies • W3C Standards • Data: XML, Namespaces, Infoset, Schema • Communication: SOAP, Encryption, WSDL, UDDI • Processing: Xpath, XSLT, Xquery, Xupdate, Xquery Text • Integration: RDF, OWL • Other Standards • Vertical domains: RosettaNet, ebXML, *ml • Workflow: BPEL • Interfaces: DOM, SAX, JAXP, SQL / XML

  19. Motivation for XML • Data lives forever (longer than program code) • legacy systems: need to keep code to keep data • huge IT infrastructures • „hello world“ program is very complex • Model before Data (you need to know what you want) • poor „time to market“, high cost • SQL + Objects are not enough • middleware, data marshalling, … • No querying of objects, no encapsulation in SQL • teure (five star guru) programmers needed • XML: Decouple Data and Schema!!!

  20. Killer XML advantages • Code/schema/data independence • Covers the continuous spectrum from totally structured data to documents • from data management to information management • Unique model for representing data,metadata and code

  21. Data + metadata + code • Data (XML), schemas (XML Schemas) and code (XSLT, XQuery): they all have an XML syntax • Easy to mix and match: • Data in the schemas (not yet) • Data in code (already done) • Code in schemas (not yet) • Code in the data (not yet) : dynamic data

  22. Misunderstanding about XML • “Data is self-describing.” • Tags don’t hold semantics, they only hold the structure of the information • The interpretation of the tags is in the application that handles the data, not in the tags themselves.

  23. XML handicaps • “Tree, and not a graph.” • Many limitations derive from here, and many complications in the XML processing languages. • Difficulty in modeling N:M relationships • The notion of reference (e.g. XLink, XPointer) not well integrated in the XML stack • “Duplication of concepts” • Many ways to do the same thing • Justification for a “simpler” data model like RDF • “Concepts that seem logically unnecessary” • PIs, comments, documents, etc • Additional complexity factors • xsi:nil, QName in content, etc • Not a complete “application server” (dev, depl., mang.)

  24. Advantages and disadvantages 1. “Handles the dual aspect of information: lexical and binary” : 1 and “01” • Essential feature for the 21st century information management • E.g. XML-based contract to be used in a legal procedure • Lots of complexity derives from here • XML Schema deals with both lexical and binary constraints • XML Data Model has to include both the dm:typed-value and dm:string-value • Processing language like XQuery and XSLT have to define their semantics for both aspects • XML data storage and indexing heavily impacted

  25. Advantages and disadvantages 2. “Data is context sensitive.” • We cannot do cut and paste in XML • Certain aspects of the data depend on the context where the fragment of data occurs (base-URIs, namespaces,etc) • Valuable feature for document management • Very hard consequences on storing, indexing and processing XML • Semantics of expressions also depends on the context where they appear • Additional consequences on expression evaluation

  26. Sources of XML data ? • Inter-application communication data (WS, Rest, etc) • Mobile devices communication data • Logs • Blogs (RSS) • Metadata (e.g. Schema, WSDL, XMP) • Presentation data (e.g. XHTML) • Documents (e.g. Word) • Views of other sources of data • Relational, LDAP, CSV, Excel, etc. • Sensor data • It would be interesting to know the pie-chart and the evolution of each branch !

  27. Some vertical application domains for XML • HealthCare Level Seven http://www.hl7.org/ • Geography Markup Language (GML) • Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) http://sbml.org/ • XBRL, the XML based Business Reporting standard http://www.xbrl.org/ • Global Justice XML Data Model (GJXDM) http://it.ojp.gov/jxdm • ebXML http://www.ebxml.org/ • e.g. Encoded Archival Description Applicationhttp://lcweb.loc.gov/ead/ • Digital photography metadata XMP • An XML grammar for sensor data (SensorML) • Real Simple Syndication (RSS 2.0) Basically everywhere.

  28. RosettaNet • http://www.rosettanet.org • Non-profit Organisation • Sponsors: IBM, Oracle, NEC, ... • More than 400 additional members • Goals: • Dynamic, flexible trading networks • Operational efficiency (cost reduction) • New business opportunities • Technical Goals: • Common language, standard processesfor sharing of electronic business information

  29. RosettaNet • PIPs = Partner Interface Processes • 8 Clusters • Support • Partner Product and Service Review • Product Information • Order Management • Inventory Management • Marketing Information Management • Service and Support • Manufacturing • Segments wiht PIP Definitions in each Cluster

  30. 3 Order Management • Segment 3a: Quote and Order Entry • Segment 3b: Transportation and Distribution • Segment 3c: Returns and Finance • Segment 3d: Product Configuration

  31. Quote and Order Entry

  32. Example DTD <!-- RosettaNet XML Message Schema 3A1_MS_R02_00_QuoteRequest.dtd (16-Apr-2001 12:46) This document has been prepared by Edifecs (http://www.edifecs.com/) based On the Business Collaboration Framework from requirements in conformance with the RosettaNet methodology. --> <!ENTITY % common-attributes "id CDATA #IMPLIED" > <!ELEMENT Pip3A1QuoteRequest ( fromRole , GlobalDocumentFunctionCode , Quote , thisDocumentGenerationDateTime , thisDocumentIdentifier , toRole ) >

  33. Example DTD (ctd.) <!ELEMENT fromRole ( PartnerRoleDescription ) > <!ELEMENT PartnerRoleDescription ( ContactInformation? , GlobalPartnerRoleClassificationCode , PartnerDescription ) > <!ELEMENT ContactInformation ( contactName , EmailAddress , facsimileNumber? , telephoneNumber ) > <!ELEMENT contactName ( FreeFormText ) > <!ELEMENT FreeFormText ( #PCDATA ) > <!ATTLIST FreeFormText xml:lang CDATA #IMPLIED >

  34. Example DTD (ctd.) <!ELEMENT Quote ( comments? , financedBy? , GlobalGovernmentPriorityRatingCode? , GlobalQuoteTypeCode , governmentContractIdentifier? , PriceCondition? , QuoteCustomerInformation? , QuoteLineItem+ , quoteRequestIdentifier* , requestedResponseDate? , RequoteReference? , respondTo* , submittedDate? , TaxExemptStatus? , transportedBy? ) >

  35. ebXML • http://www.ebxml.org • OASIS: Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards • Non profit, ... (like RosettaNet) • Competition to RosettaNet • ebXML Mission: To provide an open XML based infrastructure enabling the global use of electronic business information in an interoperable, secure and consistent manner for all parties. • Uses XML Schema (not DTDs)

  36. ebXML Example (SOAP) <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/…” xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/…”> <SOAP:Header xmlns:eb="http://www.oasis-open.org/…” xsi:schemaLocation="http://…”> <eb:MessageHeader ...> ... </eb:MessageHeader> </SOAP:Header> <SOAP:Body xmlns:eb="http://www.oasis-open.org/…” xsi:schemaLocation="http://…”> <eb:Manifest eb:version="2.0"> ... </eb:Manifest> </SOAP:Body> </SOAP:Envelope>

  37. ebXML Header Info (u.a.) • Conversation ID <eb:ConversationID>2000-33-15-7</eb:ConversationID> • Sender and Recipient <eb:From> <eb:PartyId eb:type = „urn:duns“>123</eb:PartyId> <eb:PartyId eb:type = „SCAC“>RDWY</eb:PartyId> <eb:Role>http://rosettanet.org/roles/Buyer</eb:Role> </eb:From> <eb:To> <eb:PartId>mailto:joe@example.com</eb:PartId> <eb:Role>http://rosettanet.org/roles/Seller</eb:Role> </eb:To>

More Related