130 likes | 233 Vues
Explore the benefits of recording custodial interrogations in law enforcement, addressing concerns and highlighting positive experiences. Learn about the survey findings, favorite quotes, and recording laws across various states. Understand the impact on police experiences and the judicial process. Discover the technology used and the legislative landscape for implementing such recording practices.
E N D
Recording Custodial Interrogations Andrew W. Vail Jenner & Block LLP Chicago
Overview of Work • Beginning a new dialogue • Surveying law enforcement • Reporting on the police experience
Our Survey • 300+ departments • 43 states: urban, rural, large and small • Not scientific - telephone interviews or written surveys with confirmation letters • Departments that electronically record custodial interviews - from Miranda warnings until the end - in a defined subset of cases
Executive Summary • Recording custodial interrogations is beneficial tool for law enforcement that improves the judicial process. • Often theorized detractions from instituting the practice are not expressed by officers who actually record. • Appears to be inevitable change for the better, which is best implemented by legislation.
Favorite Quotes • “Recording is the best thing we’ve ever had rammed down our throats.” –Minn. prosecutor • “We would never go back to unrecorded statements.” –Mont. department
Favorite Quotes • “We are recording all interrogations and are continuing to have great success. Our detectives have made the transition very well…and have found their confession rates have not been compromised…it is a much better method than the old fashioned method.” –Broward Cnty., Fla.
Our Findings: Police Experiences • Permanent, unquestionable record of the interview • Captures Miranda warnings and reduces motions to suppress on that basis • Demonstrates lack of abuse or illegal coercion and reduces motions on that basis; also eliminates civil suits based on false allegations of abuse
Our Findings: Police Experiences • Raises public confidence that police are not abusive during interrogations • Removes the need to make detailed notes • Supervising or fellow officers can watch interviews in real time and offer suggestions • Officers do not need to rely on memory
Our Findings: Police Experiences • Officers can review past interrogations • Financial cost is not a concern as the technology ranges from simple to sophisticated • Long-term savings outweigh front-end costs • Confessions are not lost because suspects “clam-up” if recorded
Recording Laws • State or municipal code: Illinois, D.C., New Mexico, Maine • Courts: Alaska, Minnesota, *New Jersey, *Massachusetts, *New Hampshire • Pending Legislation: 19 States & DC
Recording Laws • Legislation is the best method for implementing recording laws: • Guidelines • Necessary exceptions • Consequences • Funding • Eavesdropping laws
Recording Technology • Equipment: from simple to sophisticated • Chicago Police Department: a model for the future