1. The Department of Educational Administration 2012-2013 Assessment ReportSchool of Education and Human ServicesCarol Godsave, Chair, Assessment Coordinator and Jeff Linn, PhD, with assistance from Kathy LaLonde, PhD, and Keith NoblesSeptember 27, 2013School of __________________

2. Student Learning Outcomes • Content Knowledge • Pedagogical Knowledge • Professional Knowledge and Skills • Reflective Skills • Professional Dispositions • Impact on Student Learning Theme 1: A Solid Base of Knowledge and Skills Theme 2: Professional Dispositions Theme 3: Positive Impact on P-12 Learning

3. Student Learning Outcome Assessed: Theme 1 • Students in Educational Administration will have a deep knowledge of: • Leadership process needed for a positive impact on student learning • Pedagogy required for a positive impact on K-12 student learning at the building level • Pedagogy required for a positive impact on K-12 student learning at the district level • Procedure for formulating and presenting K-12 student learning outcomes that are accessible to all stakeholders • Administrative/leadership strategies to positively impact student learning

4. Student Learning Outcome Assessed: Theme 2 Students in Educational Administration will be able to: • Write professional documents that are free of spelling, punctuation and grammar errors. • Write professional documents that are clear and concise. • Use oral communications skills that are professional, free of jargon and/or appropriate language, organized, concise and audience specific. • Collect K-12 student performance data, organize the data, interpret and summarize the data with respect to a school improvement plan.

5. Student Learning Outcomes Assessed: Theme 3 Students in Educational Administration will be able to: • Use administrative strategies to positively impact K-12 student learning • Describe their leadership style to others both in oral and written formats • Describe how their leadership style will promote positive K-12 student learning

6. Student Learning Outcomes Assessed: Theme 4 Measures used to assess Educational Administration student satisfaction and achievement: • Maintain a B average or above throughout the program • Indicate satisfaction with the program via IAS form S questions 5-9 • Successfully pass the School District Leader (NSTCE) examination

7. How the assessment was accomplished

8. How the assessment was accomplished

9. How the assessment was accomplished

10. Data driven decision making: The Results

11. Moving Forward: Action Plan/Data Driven Decision: i.e., “Closing the Loop” • On the targeted assessments, all students were at Meeting: “P” (80%) or above on their final submission • It is critical that graduates in Educational Administration produce error free oral and written communications • The Educational Administration Department must provide an opportunity for students to reach the goal of error free productions • Multiple submissions are a necessary part of the learning process • To date, there is no technology mechanism that allow us to track the multiple submission grading rate

12. Sample data driven basis for Action Plan

13. Sample data driven basis for Action Plan

14. Resources needed to close the loop • As a result of the data analysis, the department will work with IT (TK20 and/or ANGEL) to enable this tracking to occur