E N D
1. 1
Karnataka Power Corporation Limited
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4 INSTALLED CAPACITY
5. 5
6. 6 Performance of KPCL Stations Apr - Sep (2003 - 04) 2003- 04 2002-03
Total Generation (MU) 8912 8400
Thermal (MU) 5434 5041
Hydel (MU) 3467 3352
Wind Farm (MU) 10.883 7.081
RTPS PLF 84.16 % 91.09%
7. 7 List of projects executed (MW) RTPS - 7X210 = 1470 THERMAL
Sharavathy-10x 103.5 = 1035
Linganamakki-2x27.5 = 55
Nagjhari-3x150+3x135 = 855
Supa-2x50 = 100
Varahi-2x115 = 230
Mani Dam-2x4.5 = 9
Ghataprabha-2x16 = 32 HYDEL
Mallapur-2x4.5 = 9
Mini hydel = 1.75
Bhadra = 39.2
Kadra 3x50 = 150
Kodasalli 3x 40 = 120
Gerusoppa 4 x 60 = 240
Total hydel = 2875.95
Kappatagudda - = 4.555 WIND
Grand total = 4350.505
8. 8 Particulars 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 (30.9.03)
Generation 5538 6013 7762 8904 8954 10292 5433
(MU)
P L F (%) 75.26 81.72 81.52 80.67 81.12 90.39 84.16
Av. Factor 88.60 90.44 87.41 87.63 84.78 92.39 86.47
Aux. Cons % 8.26 8.21 8.00 8.15 8.53 8.50 8.68
Sp.Coal Cons. 0.711 0.706 0.713 0.678 0.637 0.642 0.66
(kg/kwh)
Station heat rate 2720 2589 2544 2486 2498 2504
Sp. Oil Cons. 0.771 1.09 1.237 1.546 1.084 0.668 0.7
(ml/kwh)
PLF - National average - 72%
CEA norms for 210 MW units, aux. consumption - 9.5%
spec. oil consumption - 3.5 ml/kwh
9. 9
Particulars 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04
(30.9.03)
Generation
( Million Units) 10350 9858 11711 10544 9268* 6846** 3469
Total inflows (TMC) 341 282 323 307 208 192 182
Av. Factor % 89.12 89.95 89.16 92.64 87.34# 85.35# 86.38
Aux. Cons % 1.22 1.07 1.10 1.06 0.94 1.19 --
10. 10 Employees position
11. 11 DETAILS OF O&M EXPENDITURE, AND ESTABLISHMENT EXPENSES (IN RS CRORES)
12. 12 Annual availability factor of generating stations in %
13. 13 Sharavathi & LinganamakkiO&M cost (Rs Lakhs)
14. 14 Nagjhari & Supa- O&M cost
15. 15 Varahi & Mani Dam Power House - O&M cost
16. 16
For future plant norms justification can be discussed up-front.
For existing plant :
- There is a need to understand Industry as
it exists.
- Environment under which it is performing
- Norms shall address enabling provision to
pull up performance.
While wielding carrot/stick care is needed as it may danger the Industry.
17. 17
Tariff norms shall cover methodology of Tariff fixation of existing plants considering
a) capacity of the plant
b) Vintage/Technology
c) Present level of performance
d) Level of redundancy/stock of Insurance spares
e) Type of fuel.
F) Constraints for improvements
g) Possibility of sustenance of the present level of
performance
18. 18 Should spell the
- Principle guiding fixation of base level of performance for
reward/penalty.
Norms shall be dynamic to absorb improvement
in performance as Industry matures.
- Hence provision for review/revision
indicating review period
- Shall cover the basic frame structure of Tariff
setting
Fixed/variable components
- Pass through components with reasons
19. 19
Merit order dispatch:
- Present system considers only the variable cost irrespective of fixed cost.
- Hence power with high fixed and low variable cost gets dispatched on priority.
- Care shall be taken while posting Take or pay commitment for
fuel in fixed comportment.
- Shall provide for risk mitigation such as for:
- Coal
- Railways
- Monsoon vagaries
20. 20 Peak & off peak tariff for hydro stations
Insurance of hydel assets
Impact due to poor receivables
Impact of size of hydro plants on:
Availability
Auxiliary consumption
Impact of the inheritance of chronic problems on plant availability
Salient submission
21. 21 ROE - 16%(Post tax)
- 80 : 20 Debt- equity
- Translates to Net ROE 13.33%
SHR - 2500 Kcal/Kwh or Actuals
whichever is lower for 210MW
AC - 9%
AVF/PLF - 80%/ 75%
No LC rebate after due date
Operating Norms- Thermal
22. 22 AC - 1% for overground
1.5% for underground
AVF - 85%
Peak an off peak tariff
Review for Design Energy
Two-part tariff structure
Incentives
No LC rebate after due date
Operating Norms- Hydro
23. 23 O & M - Base year 2002-03 (actuals)
- Escalation linked to Index
- No adjustment factor for improved productivity
Operating Norms
24. 24