1 / 27

Contract Security Guard Services

Contract Security Guard Services. Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011. Security Guard Services. Outline Historical perspective Current contract review State Contract Negotiations with G4S Recommendations. Security Guard Services. Outline

dima
Télécharger la présentation

Contract Security Guard Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

  2. Security Guard Services • Outline • Historical perspective • Current contract review • State Contract • Negotiations with G4S • Recommendations

  3. Security Guard Services • Outline • Historical perspective • Current contract review • State Contract • Negotiations with G4S • Recommendations

  4. Security Guard Services • Guard Services since 1985 • Services instituted following Courthouse shootings • Original services for Courthouse sites only • Contract has grown with County needs

  5. Security Guard Services • Prior Contract Providers • Wells Fargo - 1985 / 1990 • Securex - 1990 / 1994 • Argenbright - 1994 / 2002 • G4S Secure Solutions USA* – 2002 / Present * Formerly Wackenhut

  6. Security Guard Services • Reasons for change • Lack of consistency/reliability • Low wages • High turnover rate • Serious management issues • Unsettling to Courthouse occupants

  7. Security Guard Services • Major Contract Revision in 2002 • Require minimum guard pay levels • Improve retention and quality of guard • Enhance Training for screening • Improve security at Courthouses & other sites in response to 9/11 • Improve Supervisory requirements

  8. Public/Private Joint Effort at Courthouses Contractor provides building security and performs scanning role Sheriff’s Office oversees Court security measures Security Guard Services

  9. Security Guard Services • Outline • Historical perspective • Current contract review • State Contract • Negotiations with G4S • Recommendations

  10. Security Guard Services • Contract with G4S • In 2002 G4S was selected through RFP • In 2007 G4S was again selected through an RFP • 3-Year contract started March 1, 2007 • 2 One Year Renewals • Began Year 5 on March 1, 2011 • Negotiations for final year began in Dec. 2010 • Contract expires February 28, 2012 • Current Annual Usage: $5.5 Million

  11. Security Guard Services • FY 2011 Reduction in Manning Hours/Costs - $956,000 Annually • Courts – 5,096 Hours/$117,309 • County Admin – 10,634 Hours/$184,500 • Utilities – 17,472 Hours/$254,916 • Public Works – 12,922 Hours/$188,532 • Fire Rescue – 8,736 Hours/$127,458 • Other – 5,772 Hours/$84,324

  12. Security Guard Services Offices 13% Courthouses 41% Utilities 14% Corrections/Juvenile Assessment 32 %

  13. Security Guard Services • Courthouses - 41% • Orange County Courthouse • Juvenile Justice Center • Winter Park Civil Court • Apopka/Ocoee Civil Court

  14. Security Guard Services • Corrections & Juvenile Assessment - 32% • Corrections Administration • Booking and Release Center • Perimeter Posts • Video Visitation • Juvenile Assessment Center

  15. Security Guard Services • Utilities Sites - 14% • Administration • Landfill • Presidents Drive • Water Reclamation • Regional Water Supply

  16. Security Guard Services • Administration Center • IOC I • Regional History Center • Barnett Park • Medical Clinic • Offices - 13%

  17. Security Guard Services • Topics • Historical perspective • Current contract review • State Contract • Negotiations with G4S • Recommendations

  18. Security Guard Services • State Contract for Security Guard Services • Basic Security Services • Minimal qualifications contained in RFP • Three Vendors • Allegiance • Allied Barton • G4S Secure Solutions USA

  19. Security Guard Services • State Contract Concerns • Minimal Specifications • Inconsistent or unidentified guard levels between vendors • No training requirements • No site specific training identified • No screening training • No Minimum pay levels set • Necessary to improve retention and consistent performance

  20. Security Guard Services • Use of the State Contract • Specifications do not support County Operational requirements • State does not manage Courthouses • Contract does not address screening requirements

  21. Security Guard Services • Topics • Historical perspective • Current contract review • State Contract • Negotiations with G4S • Recommendations

  22. Security Guard Services • Negotiate reduction in Hourly rates with G4S • For last year of contract • Use State Contract Pricing as basis • Different requirements • Negotiated an Estimated Savings of $496,276 for last year of contract

  23. Security Guard Services

  24. Security Guard Services • Outline • Historical perspective • Current contract review • State Contract • Negotiations with G4S • Recommendations

  25. Security Guard Services • Recommendations for RFP Refinements • Security Guard Services divided into 4 Lots • #1 – Courthouses & Admin Center • #2 – Corrections & Juvenile Assessment Center • #3 – Utilities • #4 – Other Buildings • Allows for award to multiple vendors • Tailors guard requirements to building requirements • Maximize potential savings while maintaining the appropriate level of security

  26. Security Guard Services • Recommendations • Accept negotiated hourly rates with G4S • Modify Requirement in the RFP • Issue RFP in October 2011 • Select firm in December 2011 • Transition in February 2012

  27. Contract Security Guard Services Presented to the Board of County Commissioners March 8, 2011

More Related