1 / 3

Assessing Predicted vs. Measured Rrs with Imported Chlzdata and IOPs from HydroLight Input

This study evaluates the accuracy of predicted vs. measured Rrs using imported Chlzdata and IOPs from HydroLight input. Results indicate a reasonable match over a week-long span, attributing CDOM absorption in the blue to deviations from case 1 models.

dinah
Télécharger la présentation

Assessing Predicted vs. Measured Rrs with Imported Chlzdata and IOPs from HydroLight Input

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Question 2: Import IOPs with Chlzdata from Question 1 a b

  2. HydroLight Input: Predicted vs. Measured Rrs

  3. Predicted vs. Measured Rrs Reasonable, given that measurements were taken over a week long period (not ready to ask for my money back yet). Captures the high absorption of CDOM in the blue, something not captured by the case 1 models.

More Related