1 / 1

Discourse-Initial Too and Epistemic Modality Sumiyo Nishiguchi Tokyo University of Science

ELSJ Spring Forum 2011 Shizuoka University April 24, 2011. Discourse-Initial Too and Epistemic Modality Sumiyo Nishiguchi Tokyo University of Science. Q: Why do discourse-initial too and mo “too” not require their antecedents? . Discourse-initial too ( 2)It’s nice here, too .

dixie
Télécharger la présentation

Discourse-Initial Too and Epistemic Modality Sumiyo Nishiguchi Tokyo University of Science

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ELSJ Spring Forum 2011 Shizuoka University April 24, 2011 Discourse-Initial Too and Epistemic ModalitySumiyoNishiguchiTokyo University of Science Q: Why do discourse-initial too and mo “too” not require their antecedents? • Discourse-initial too • (2)It’s nice here, too. • has not been discussed so far • appears discourse-initially • uttered unexpectedly without sounding remotely peculiar • no antecedent • no contrastive focus • Proposal: discourse-initial toois • an epistemic necessity modal (epistemic must) • an emphatic marker, similar to indeed or really. • a sentential modal that associates with a whole proposition. • (5)[| too |] = lp<s, t>. lw.w’.[wRw’ -> p(w’) = 1] • (R: epistemic accessibility relation, w: possible world) • In all the worlds epistemically accessible from the actual world to the speaker, the proposition to which too is attached is true (Kratzer 1981). • Speaker believes that the proposition holds true. • The interpretation of (2) is true, if and only if the speaker believes that the location s/he is in is nice. • Japanese additive particle mo “too/also” • (4) #(Kyoto-wa i-shi,) • Kyoto-TOP good-and • Nara-mo ii. • Nara-also good • “Kyoto is good and so is Nara.” • Nara is contrasted with its antecedent Kyoto • Regularmo-sentences are felicitous only when they follow another sentence • Japanese discourse-initial mo ``too/also” • (3)Yo-mofuke-ta. • night-also grow-PAST • Mo neru-to shi-yo. • already sleep-COMP do-let’s • “It’s late, indeed. It’s time to go to bed.” • There is no antecedent for yo “night” • Yo“night” is not particularly contrasted with anything else • Romero and Han (2004) • Reallyand indeed are epistemic adverbs which express the speaker’s evaluations. • Nara is really good. • (6) is true if Nara is good in any of the speaker’s belief world. Given such a meaning, the sentential modal too should take higher scope over the proposition TP It T’ T MODALP is Modal PredP too PredPAdvP <is> AP here nice Conjunctive adverb too (1)Kyoto is nice. Nara is nice, too meaning of also felicitous only when it follows another sentence Kyoto is the antecedent for Nara • The syntactic structure of the expletive construction • Tooc-commands PredP in base position. • Niceand here are assumed to be raised higher so that too is spelled out in the lower position compared to them. • Numata(1986) attenuation • Teramura(1984) admiration • No discussion about discourse-initial behaviorof mo Conclusion: This paper presented an analysis of the novel use of too from semantic and syntactic perspectives

More Related