1 / 20

Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks

Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks. Chunnan Yao Directed by Dr.Haifeng Zheng, Dr.Su Zhang. 1. Outline. Introduction Background Objective problem model using compressive sensing Step1:reconstruction of path Step2:reconstruction of link parameters Summary &future work.

dmckeever
Télécharger la présentation

Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks Chunnan Yao Directed by Dr.Haifeng Zheng, Dr.Su Zhang 1

  2. Outline Introduction Background Objective problem model using compressive sensing Step1:reconstruction of path Step2:reconstruction of link parameters Summary&future work Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 2 2

  3. Background • WSN topology tomography • we need to know the status of parameters(such as delay)for links inside a WSN. It helps us to understand detailed properties of the network in many network maintenance and diagnosis situations. • Difficulties • WSN is self-organized and usually deployed in dynamic environments. No fixed routing path can be expected for each node. Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 3

  4. Objective • We seek to infer the status of parameters(such as delay)for links inside a network through information collected by the sink node. Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 4

  5. Problem formulation • Additive linear model represents the relationship between a measured path and an individual link delay[1]. sink n2->n6: l1->l3->l4 n1->n5: l2->l3->l5 n1->n2: l2->l1 n5->n6: l5->l4 [1]Firooz M, Roy S. Link delay estimation via expander graphs[J]. 2011. Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 5

  6. Problem formulation • x is n×1(unkown) vector of the individual link delay. R is r×n routing matrix for each packet. y is the measured r-vector by the sinking node. • Here we assume the network consisting of bidirectional links, and no looped routes exist. • For most networks, n>>r! Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks

  7. Problem formulation • Basic idea: Compressive sensing[2] • standard CS framework: • X is an N×1 sparse discrete signal vector, Φis an M×N measurement matrix and Y is the M×1 measurement vector. M<<N. • This can be achieved by solving the following optimization: [2]Candès E J, Romberg J, Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information[J]. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, 2006, 52(2): 489-509. Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 7

  8. Problem formulation =Φ • Step1: determine the sensing matrix Φ using path reconstruction • Step2: Given all paths(Φ) and sink node information(Y), determine link properties X(delay,packet loss rate, etc). • The speed and accuracy of of step1 is vital. Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 8

  9. Outline Introduction problem model using compressive sensing Step1:reconstruction of path a state-of-art method: MNT reconstruction using CS my refinement Step2:reconstruction of link parameters Summary&future work Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 9 9

  10. MNT(Multi-hop Network Tomography • Use data already attached to each packet. • Key part: time estimation • Advantages:1. No change in the headers of inner nodes.2. Low computation complexity. • Disadvantages:1. susceptible to packet losses and routing dynamics. Default CTP header: source ID, sequence number, oder, parent node ID, hop count According to data from trace-driven simulations on Citysee, MNT's accuracy is below 60% in a certain WSN scenrio, which is not satisfactory. Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 10

  11. CS based path reconstruction • Different paths need to be classified, ie. add a header:bFlt, use an L-bit array associated with H independent hash functions) to space-efficiently record node IDs[3][4]. • The path already reconstructed are stored for future reuse. • Advantages:1. resist to dynamic links 2. lower delay • Disadvantages:1. more computation complexity on sinking node 2. packet overhead 3. Packets from inactive nodes have less opportunity to be reconstructed. [3]Xiaoyan Z, Houjun W, Zhijian D. Wireless sensor networks based on compressed sensing [4]Ideas from Dr. Haifeng Zheng Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 11

  12. My refinement • Inspiration • Wasted pre-failure information in MNT • Reconstruct the total path using CS after failure of MNT • Design of the combination • Implement path classification and introduce additional header 'Acc' to every node in the same way as that in CS reconstruction method. • However, at the sink node, we implement MNT first to get the failure point, denoded by pf. Then we use pf to get a new sensing matrix(Φ') and compressed information(y'). Solve ,in which the number of sensing matrix's row is reduced by f Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 12

  13. Simulation of Step1 • Configurations • 400 nodes(1 sink node) randomly distributed in a 1000*1000 area. Nodes in the radius of 65 can form a link. The number 65 is chosen to ensure each nodes are connected. • We simulate 40000 time units. In each time unit, 5 nodes transmit packets. Nodes are classified as 'active' and 'inactive', whose sending probability is 0.0125 and 0.001. • The routing path is formed by the shortest path algorithm. • The success rate of MNT is set as 70%, which means 30% packets' path need CS to reconstruct. Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 13

  14. Simulation result of step1 • Improvements of my refinement: • Lower loss rate. When reconstruction procedure is finished, CS based reconstruction has a loss rate of 12.15%, while CS&MNT is 6.20% • Less delay. The time when CS based method reaches its reconstruction plateau is 6459, while CS&MNT is 5433. • Higher reconstruction rate. MNT can help CS to reconstruct the paths of inactive nodes. CS based method reconstructs 88.72% paths while CS&MNT reconstructs 96.74%. Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 14

  15. Outline Introduction problem model using compressive sensing Step1:reconstruction of path Step2:reconstruction of link parameters Stasis, pre-determined network tomography Expander graph Use expander graph in WSN Summary&future work Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 15 15

  16. Step2:reconstruction of link parameters • Stasis, pre-determined network tomography[5] • don't need step1, and the topology of network can be pre-determined to ensure the CS reconstruction constrains:expander graph. • Recall the problem model: • Given routing matrix Φ, Y is known, X is unknown, we need to solve • Expander graph [5]Link Delay Estimation Via Expander Graphs( Mohammad H.Firooz, 2012) Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 16

  17. Step2:reconstruction of link parameters • Extend former problem model • Include all possible routes in our topology.N much larger and Φ more sparse. • probability of a random sparse matrix to be compatible to expander graph. For a (2, d, 1/4) expander graph, we have: Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 17

  18. Summary • I proposed a refinement on WSN path reconstruction problem based on MNT and CS. • I tried to verify that for a very sparse WSN routing matrix, l1-minimization method is reliable to reconstruct routing parameters. • future work: • Determine the MNT&CS switch point in Step1 using network informations. • Implement more reliable simulation and deploy MNT&CS method in real wireless sensor networks. Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks 18

  19. References • Xiaoyan Z, Houjun W, Zhijian D. Wireless sensor networks based on compressed sensing[C]//Computer Science and Information Technology (ICCSIT), 2010 3rd IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2010, 9: 90-92. • Liang Y, Liu R. Compressed topology tomography in sensor networks[C]//Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2013 IEEE. IEEE, 2013: 1321-1326. • Firooz M, Roy S. Link delay estimation via expander graphs[J]. 2011. • Keller M, Beutel J, Thiele L. Multi-hop network tomography: path reconstruction and per-hop arrival time estimation from partial information[C]//ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review. ACM, 2012, 40(1): 421-422. • Xu W, Mallada E, Tang A. Compressive sensing over graphs[C]//INFOCOM, 2011 Proceedings IEEE. IEEE, 2011: 2087-2095. • Berinde R, Indyk P. Sparse recovery using sparse random matrices[J]. preprint, 2008. Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks

  20. Thank you for listening Chunnan Yao Directed by Dr.Haifeng Zheng, Dr.Su Zhang 20 Compressed Topology Tomography in Sensor Networks

More Related