1 / 19

Yes We Can!

Yes We Can!. (We already have in Texas). Forbes: Fort Bend County No. 1 in Job Growth. Fort Bend County Texas – Who We Are . Fort Bend County takes top spot in Forbes Magazine’s list of “Best Places to Get Ahead .” Home to 3 of top 10 best selling MPC in USA.

dolan
Télécharger la présentation

Yes We Can!

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Yes We Can! (We already have in Texas)

  2. Forbes: Fort Bend County No. 1 in Job Growth Fort Bend County Texas – Who We Are Fort Bend County takes top spot in Forbes Magazine’s list of “Best Places to Get Ahead.” Home to 3 of top 10 best selling MPC in USA

  3. Fort Bend County Texas – Who We Are http://www.myfoxhouston.com/dpp/news/local/100202-forbes-fort-bend-job-growth

  4. Fort Bend County Texas - LID # 2 Location • FBC LID #2 protects: • About $4 billion of property & assets • First Colony MPC - 10,000 homes • Sugar Land Town Square • Multiple hospitals • Major retail & business centers • Critical transportation arteries • All done without Federal help Sugar Land Houston • FBC LID #2 protects: • Over $4 billion of property & assets • Major portions of Sugar Land • First Colony - 10,000 homes • Sugar Land Town Square • Multiple hospitals • Major retail & business centers • Critical transportation arteries FBC LID # 2

  5. Flood Plain Management Draft of Sugar Land Flood Map

  6. Flood Plain Management Reality of Levee Failures

  7. Fort Bend County LID # 2 Organization District Management Utilizing Outside Resources Elected Commissioners Court Bookkeeping Accounting Legal FBC LID #2 Appointed Board of Directors Communications Tax Collection Operations & Maintenance Construction Management Engineering General Manager

  8. 2005 to Today • Remapping the County (Map Modernization) • FEMA’s Schedule • LEVEE DE-ACCREDITATION . . . LOOMING! • Levee Improvements . . . NOW! • The Machine” • Model Review • Design & Construction • 30 Miles Raised/10 Miles New Levees ($40 Million of LOCAL funds . . . NO Fed funds) • RE-CERTIFICATIONS ACCEPTED BY FEMA! • Re-accreditation pending FEMA release of maps

  9. 881 Counties Nationwide with Levees • 41 Flood Control Entities in Fort Bend County • 16 Levee Improvement Districts • Creation of NFIP & Availability of Flood Insurance

  10. NFIP Needs to Change • NFIP is in debt from 2004-2005 Storm Losses • NFIP Expired September 2008 • NFIP Extended by Continuing Resolution through February 2010 and then through May 2010 and again until September 30 • Senate took action 9/21 to extend to 2011

  11. NFIP Needs to Change • NFIP has 5.6 million policies currently • NFIP wants to raise rates and make insurance mandatory behind Levees and other structures. • NFIP needs to sell more policies to recover • Most floods occur in Zone X

  12. Flood Plain Management • Risk Maps • NEW Risk Map Program for Flood Risk Assessment • Map • Assessment • Planning • Stricter Regulations Coming • More Inspections • More STRINGENT Inspections

  13. Flood Plain Management • Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) • WRDA 2010 Eminent • 2011 . . . NEW Environmental Priorities • Increased Funding for Water Infrastructure • Renewed Emphasis on ”Natural Rivers” • ”Right the Wrongs” of the Past . . . ???

  14. EPA & Stormwater Management MS4 (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems) Levee Improvement Districts (LIDs) are “Phase 2” Permit Holders • EPA has declared war on stormwater management agencies – “Stop whining and start performing . . . “ • Some of those affected believe regulations are ahead of the ability of agencies to perform • No scientifically significant data exists on impact of Low Impact Development (LID) standards • EPA has no plans to fund any studies other than small pilot projects, i.e. rain gardens with no long term data - hidden negatives are popping up . . . they say JUST DO IT

  15. Stormwater Management • EPA wants . . . . . . • Low Impact Development & Flood Plain Interface • Look at stormwater as a RESOURCE & NOT WASTE • NFIP is NOTmeeting need of Endangered Species Act • We are enabling flood plain development that is hurting ecosystem – ”Pipes & Ponds” approach no longer feasible • Green Infrastructure Action Strategy - 80 national groups have signed statement of support • Created Green Infrastructure Web Site • www.epa.gov/greeninfrastructure • Is Climate Change Real?

  16. Stormwater Management EPA wants . . . . . . Low Impact Development & Flood Plain Interface • LID Is REAL (Doesn’t MeanLevee Improvement District) • Is 95% Retention Possible? • Mandatedfor New Development • Probable for Redevelopment • Possible for Retrofitting Existing Development • On site capture and detention necessary • Eliminate curbs and gutters

  17. The Bottom Line • One Size Does NOT Fit All • Different Residual Risks for Different Systems • Key Elements Affecting Residual Risk • Level of Protection • Maintenance Standards • Management • Financing • More Local Responsibility Required

  18. Tomorrow – Moving Forward!! • Consistent Design Standards • Consistent Operation & Maintenance Standards • Accurate Mapping of Flood Risk Areas • Reasonable Time for Improvement Implementation • More interaction between Corps & FEMA • Local Sponsor (Community) Purchases Policy • National Levee Initiative

  19. Flood Control Summary Contact Information: André McDonald President of Fort Bend County LID #2 Email: macsugarland@gmail.com “Without flood control, nothing else matters . . . “ Association of Levee Boards of Louisiana

More Related