1 / 22

Cory Parsons, PAS Associate Professor, Department of Animal Sciences

A PRODUCTION PRACTICES SURVEY OF COW-CALF PRODUCERS IN NORTHEASTERN OREGON: ASSESSING THE INDUSTRY’S EDUCATIONAL NEEDS. Cory Parsons, PAS Associate Professor, Department of Animal Sciences OSU Extension Baker & Union Counties. Introduction & Goals.

donat
Télécharger la présentation

Cory Parsons, PAS Associate Professor, Department of Animal Sciences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A PRODUCTION PRACTICES SURVEY OF COW-CALF PRODUCERS IN NORTHEASTERN OREGON: ASSESSING THE INDUSTRY’S EDUCATIONAL NEEDS Cory Parsons, PAS Associate Professor, Department of Animal Sciences OSU Extension Baker & Union Counties

  2. Introduction & Goals • Need to provide timely and pertinent information • In order to monitor/measure change I needed to assess the current status • Decided to conduct a producer survey

  3. Materials & Methods • Modified an existing survey (Bohnert et al. 2005) • Modified a 22 question survey into a more comprehensive 27 question survey • Focusing on economically important cow/calf management practices • Mailed 415 self addressed-stamped confidential surveys to cow/calf producers in Baker and Union counties of northeaster Oregon • Waited 2 month and sent a reminder • After 4 months we analyzed the responses

  4. Results • Analyzed data using SPSS 13.0, 2004 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois) • 103 total surveys were returned (25%) • 72 surveys from Baker County (20%) • 31 surveys from Union County (7%) Although County survey data results often varied, for the purpose of this presentation all results have been pooled and will be reported as such.

  5. Results Herd Size The average herd size varied widely, with the most common herd being 301-400 head which was reported by 15.7% of respondents. NAHMS 1997 80% 1 - 49 head 19% 50 – 499 head 1% > 500 head

  6. ResultsType of Operation • We listed seven categories for type of beef operation, and respondents were asked to check all that applied. Many respondents listed multiple operation types, indicating the diverse nature of beef production operations in Northeastern Oregon.

  7. Results Culling Practices

  8. Results Culling Practices

  9. Results Cow Replacement Practices

  10. Results Cow Replacement Practices

  11. Results Annual Cow Costs

  12. ResultsFeed Resources

  13. ResultsFeed Resources NAHMS 1997 9% conduct forage analysis 22% formulate rations

  14. ResultsBull Management 81% of the survey respondents purchase their bull battery from either a bull sale or by private treaty. Only 3% of respondents listed the local auction barn as the location they purchase bulls and 10% of producers stated they do a combination of raising their own bulls and purchasing from bull sale.

  15. ResultsBull Management

  16. ResultsBull Management (BSE) NAHMS 1997 54% of producers in the West conduct Semen evaluation 65% conduct some type of BSE

  17. ResultsCow Reproduction 76% run between 15-25 cows per bull NAHMS 1997 94% one calving season 10% 2 or more calving seasons

  18. ResultsCow Reproduction 63% have a breeding season less than 60 days NAHMS 1997 62% < 105 days 21.2% <64 days

  19. ResultsCalf Marketing When asked if they currently participate in a retained ownership / niche marketing program 29% stated yes with the remaining 71% stating no.

  20. Conclusions • Though not totally inclusive I believe that the results of this survey will be extremely valuable in guiding the Extension livestock programming efforts in Northeastern Oregon.

  21. Conclusions • Practices such as, • not verifying pregnancy • not testing forages • not conducting BSE • not selling open cows are some areas that could benefit from educational efforts with positive impacts.

  22. THANK YOU QUESTIONS Cory Parsons, PAS Associate Professor, Department of Animal Sciences OSU Extension Baker & Union Counties

More Related