1 / 19

Peer reviewer Basic Workshop

Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project. Peer reviewer Basic Workshop. Prof. Dr. Gamalat M. Ali Director of Tanta Quality Assurance Center , Tanta University. Internal System for Quality Management

donnan
Télécharger la présentation

Peer reviewer Basic Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project Peer reviewerBasicWorkshop Prof. Dr. Gamalat M. Ali Director of Tanta Quality Assurance Center , Tanta University

  2. Internal System for Quality Management A system that involves performance follow-up, precise identification of learning deficiencies and obstacles, suggestions for development and enhancement, policies, modification and needs-oriented priorities re-ordering and following-up the identification and implementation of development policies.

  3. Internal System for Quality Management A system that involves: 1-Performance follow-up, 2-precise identification of learning deficiencies and obstacles (التشخيص), 3-suggestions for development and enhancement, policies(العلاج), 4-modification and needs-oriented priorities re-ordering التعديل واعادة ترتيب مقترحات و متطلبات سياسة التحسين بناء على تحديد الأولويات المبنى على تحديد الاحتياجات 5-following-up the identification and implementation of development policies.

  4. The purposes of DE • Transitional phase to accreditation • Enhancement agenda • Builds upon the annual self-studies and the development projects • Evaluation of the effectiveness of Quality Assurance system and processes • Evaluation of the robustness of evidence base (internal reporting)

  5. The Developmental Engagement Processs • The evidence base starts with the products of internal reviews • Annual faculty report (+) • Strategic review report (self-study) • Supporting documentation • Planning of developmental engagement • By NQAAC • By review chair • By institution and facilitator • By peer reviewers

  6. The Developmental Engagement Process • Initial analysis by peer reviewers • Preparatory meeting by review chair • Engagements (site visit) verify and/or • Generate additional evidence • Conclusions, feedback and report-writing

  7. Preliminary Action by NQAAA • In sequence 1- Identification of subject sectors to be reviewed within a given time slot and institutions to be reviewed. 2- Notification to Institution of intention to Review 3- Institution informs NQAAA of subject specialism within the provision

  8. Preliminary Action by NQAAA 4- Selection of peer reviewers and acceptance by ' institution 5- Institution sends agreed documentation to NQAAA 6-8 weeks prior to first day of review. 6- QAAA makes documentation available to Chairman

  9. Preliminary Action by Institution Preparation of documentation for review, including: * Initial submission to NQAAA * Documentation (B) to be sent to review team in advance of the review * Documentation to be made available to review team during review * Preparation of academic staff to respond to review * Allocation of responsibility for aspects of the review

  10. The Evaluation Framework Academic Standards • Intended learning outcomes • Curriculum • Student assessment • Student achievement Quality of Learning opportunities • Teaching and learning • Student support • Learning resources Research and other scholarly activity Community Involvement Effectiveness of Quality Management and Enhancement • Governance and leadership • Quality assurance system • Self-evaluation, plans and impact

  11. What are the materials to be reviewed?

  12. Documentation to be sent in advance Evaluation Initial commentary 1- Faculty Annual Report. 2- Programme (S) specifications. 3- Courses’ Specifications. 4- The latest course reports. 5- The latest programme (S) reports.

  13. Documentation to be Reviewed in the Site Visit Evidence Based Evaluation • Programme approval (validation) documents • Programme handbooks • Student handbooks • Learner support materials (a sample may be sufficient)

  14. Documentation to be Reviewed in the Site Visit Evidence Based Evaluation • External evaluators' reports for the last three years if applicable • Student feedback summaries • Outcomes of consultations, surveys and other engagements with students • Recruitment and progression data including employment

  15. Documentation to be Reviewed in the Site Visit Evidence Based Evaluation • Records of staff-student liaison committee or the equivalent for the last year • Assessment criteria together with guidance and rules of marking or equivalent • Samples of students' assessed work representing all (الكنترول) levels and a sample of programmes • for at (محاضر لجان الممتحنين) Examination board minutes least three years

  16. Documentation to be Reviewed in the Site Visit Evidence Based Evaluation • Staff CVs including summary lists of research, conference papers and publications • Examples of the output from recent community service activity • Staff development programme and reports • Professional, statutory and regulatory body reports if relevant

  17. What is the importance of these documents ?

  18. The Evaluative Framework & Criteria 1- The Academic Standards. 2- Quality of Learning Opportunities. 3- Research and other Scholarly Activity. 4- Community Involvement 5-The Effectiveness of Quality Management and Enhancement.

  19. Thank you

More Related