1 / 13

Electric Potential, Energy, Capacitance 16-2 Equipotential Surfaces

 The contour lines show points on the mountain that are at the same elevation.  The yellow contour line connects points that are 14,200 feet above sea level. Electric Potential, Energy, Capacitance 16-2 Equipotential Surfaces.

donnel
Télécharger la présentation

Electric Potential, Energy, Capacitance 16-2 Equipotential Surfaces

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The contour lines show points on the mountain that are at the same elevation. The yellow contour line connects points that are 14,200 feet above sea level. Electric Potential, Energy, Capacitance16-2 Equipotential Surfaces Since my weight is 180 lbs, when I am standing on that contour line I have a potential energy of Most of us have seen a topographical map: UG = mgh = (180)(14200) = 2,556,000 ft•lbs FYI: If the altitude of Milwaukee is 600 ft, my potential energy in Milwaukee is U = (180)(600) = 108,000 ft•lbs, making U = 2,448,000 ft•lbs. Where did this energy come from? T or F: The gravitational field vector g is perpendicular to every point on the contour line.

  2. Topic 6.2 ExtendedE – Equipotential surfaces The 2D contour lines define a 3D surface: Here's the 3D view from the top of Mount Elbert:

  3. Electric Potential, Energy, Capacitance16-2 Equipotential Surfaces It is easier to visualize how these equipotential surfaces fit together to form a 3D image of the actual surface if we concentrate on the vicinity of the crest of Mount Elbert:

  4. Let's look at the equipotential surfaces from 14,200 feet up to the top of Mount Elbert:

  5. 14400 14360 14320 14280 14240 14200 Rotation, tilting, and stacking of these equipotential surfaces will produce what appears to be a 3D image of Mount Elbert:

  6. Rotation, tilting, and stacking of these equipotential surfaces will produce what appears to be a 3D image of Mount Elbert:

  7. Topic 6.2 ExtendedE – Equipotential surfaces And the contour lines will look like this: Of course, on the planetary scale the equipotential surfaces will be spherical, not flat. g g g T or F: The gravitational field vector g is perpendicular to every point on the contour line. Question: Why are the surfaces farther from the center farther apart?

  8. Topic 6.2 ExtendedE – Equipotential surfaces And the contour lines about a negative point charge will look like this: The negative point charge acts as a planet, setting up equipotential surfaces in the same way: E E E T or F: The electric field vector E is perpendicular to every point on the equipotential surface. Question: Why are the surfaces farther from the center farther apart?

  9. Topic 6.2 ExtendedE – Equipotential surfaces Suppose we have two parallel plates separated by 15 mm and charged by a 9 V battery. (a) How far apart would the equipotential surfaces be between the plates, if their potential difference was to be 0.10 V? Since the electric field is constant between the plates the equipotential surfaces will be evenly spaced (unlike those around a point charge). - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + first we find the value of the electric field... V = Ed 9 = E(0.015) E = 600 V/m now we find the distance x between the surfaces... V = Ex 600(x) 0.10 = x = 1.6710-4 m 0.015 m

  10. - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + 0.015 m Topic 6.2 ExtendedE – Equipotential surfaces Suppose we have two parallel plates separated by 15 mm and charged by a 9 V battery. (b) If we assign the value of 0 V to the negative plate, where is the equipotential surface with a potential of +3.75 V located? V = We can use the formula Ex: 0.00625 m 600x: 3.75 = x = 0.00625 m

  11. - - - - - - - - - - + + + + + + + + + + Electric Field From Potential 0.015 m Topic 6.2 ExtendedE – Equipotential surfaces If we know the potentials and the geometry of the equipotential surfaces surrounding a charged object we can find the value of the E-field using 0.00625 m V x E = - For example, suppose we are given that the voltage difference between the negative plate and the red equipotential surface is 3.75 V (it is) then the above formula gives us V - V x - x0 V x 0 = - E = - 3.75 - 0 .00625 - 0 = - = -600 V/m this is the expected value FYI: The negative in the above formula gives the correct direction of E.

  12. + - FYI: If you are given the equipotential surfaces, you can construct the E-field lines. Topic 6.2 ExtendedE – Equipotential surfaces Sketch in the equipotential surfaces between the two charges.

  13. The Kinetic Energy Change of a Charge Electron Volt FYI: The definition of the eV uses an electron. But any particle that has a charge which is an integral number can use electron volts as an energy quantity. Topic 6.2 ExtendedE – Equipotential surfaces THE ELECTRON VOLT eV FYI: The electron volt is NOT an SI unit of energy, but it is used often for describing the energy of atomic-sized particles. Recall the relationship between voltage (electric potential) and potential energy: U = qV. If we place an charge in an electric field, it will accelerate, changing its kinetic energy. From energy considerations we have K + U = 0 K = -U K = -qV We define the electron volt (eV) as the kinetic energy gained by an electron accelerated through a potential difference of exactly 1 volt: K = -qV 1 eV = -(-1.610-19 C)(1.000 V) 1 eV = 1.610-19 J

More Related