1 / 18

Infrastructure Collimators Beam line Shielding - Concrete / Pb Misc Superstructures - Ferris wheel

Infrastructure Collimators Beam line Shielding - Concrete / Pb Misc Superstructures - Ferris wheel Power / Water / Vacuum Hardware. Collimators. Manufacturing drawings essentially complete Out for budgetary quotes Material: Recast of existing 29 tons of Pb

dooley
Télécharger la présentation

Infrastructure Collimators Beam line Shielding - Concrete / Pb Misc Superstructures - Ferris wheel

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Infrastructure Collimators Beam line Shielding - Concrete / Pb Misc Superstructures - Ferris wheel Power / Water / Vacuum Hardware

  2. Collimators • Manufacturing drawings essentially complete • Out for budgetary quotes • Material: Recast of existing 29 tons of Pb • Collimator 1: Single Pb cast / machined structure +- 1mm • Primary Collimator (2): • Large wall with square hole: Smaller precision 3 axis alignable collimator: • 3” down stream & shadow shielded • Material: PbCu or Pb+ 6% Antimony (hardening agent) • Tolerance +- 0.15 mm all surfaces w.r.t. center • Collimator 3: Single large Pb wall cast +- 2mm tolerance • Plan: Place order this fiscal year

  3. Collimator 3 Collimator 1 Enclosed Region Collimator 2 (primary) Region 2 open access

  4. Beamline • Recycle “G0 instrumentation girder” --> “Qweak instrumentation girder” • Add additional “Target BPM” inside scattering chamber: • BPM inside the scattering chamber, just upstream of the target • that moves / tracks with the target flask. • Locking the DC beam position on this BPM --> the beam • will always be centered on the target! • Allows the target to be moved and "drag" the beam with it for • straight forward neutral axis studies and beam/target position set. • If the target x/y position “changes / drifts” during cooling, the position • calibration changes (motion mechanism slips) and/or beamline • gets “bumped” and alignment is messed up - these are immediately • visible by comparison to the target BPM readings with its "twin" that • does not move located just outside the scattering chamber.

  5. Beamline • The BPM inside the scattering chamber can always be the master • reference for the center of the target and is the ideal choice to put • the DC position lock on. • Absolute location of beamline BPM’s drops out of any regression analysis. • If we wish to regress on say x/y helicity correlated beam • motion it can be done totally in terms of relative units - it need not • be absolute position as no arithmetic using absolute surveyed locations • is required. • Sensitivity to helicity correlated angle modulation is obtained • by using this internal BPM and an external BPM upstream - • again no absolute reference is required. • In other words the system is self calibrating and can be used to check • the beamline BPM survey for internal constancy. • So we have some redundancy!

  6. Shielding - Concrete / Pb • All collimator “bodies” large enough in radius that line of sight from • target to Region III chamber and Quartz requires penetration • of all three collimator walls. • Collimator Base: • Concrete - no magnetic material 2 m’s upstream of target • and 1 meter below base surface. • Shielding as close to target as possible • Between collimator 1 and scattering chamber - probably Pb • (suspect this will reduce Moller background when but into Monte-Carlo) • Except for access alcoves(s) enclose region between • collimators 1 and 2 (primary) with concrete (Al rebar) • (suspect this will reduce Moller background when but into Monte-Carlo) • Leave sides and top fully accessable between • collimator 2 (primary) and collimator 3 - for region II chambers

  7. Shielding - Concrete / Pb • Detector Hut: • Made of “green blocks” for base and back wall • & existing concrete beams. • New front shield wall: • No Fe rebar (will use Al or ss) • Number of stackable pieces • May have some Pb at small radius for photon shielding • Not a precision structure • Pb Lintels inside QTOR frame • Pb wedges inside magnet to plug cracks between coils • Misc shileding around beam pipe at interfaces

  8. Region III Rotator Stand & Ferris Wheel • Region III Rotator Stand: • Made of recycled G0 forward downstream beamline stand, but ss lower legs. • Recycle all G0’s Pb boxes around 2’ beam pipe • Constructed 2 new ss boxes and filled with Pb for region • around/upstream of region III rotator - done and stored away. • G0 Ferris Wheel --> Qweak Detector Support Structure • All Al and ss, rigid and strong - would be expensive to reproduce • Has cable trays and HV cables already mounted. • Allows Pb shielded 2’ beam pipe to go through center. • Detectors will be mounted on perimeter - slighted in-front of and at larger • radius than Ferris wheel outside diameter - this open access from three sides • Easy to mount scanner, etc.

  9. Region III Cable tray Al Fe Stainless Steel Lower Legs

  10. Region 3 Rotator Sub-assemblies

  11. QTOR at MIT / Bates All coils / Holders Installed

More Related