1 / 15

Access Enabled, Access Denied: Supporting Inclusive Practice with Digital Data

Access Enabled, Access Denied: Supporting Inclusive Practice with Digital Data. Sue Watling - University of Lincoln, UK 11 th International Conference on Diversity in Organisations, Communities and Nations University of the Western Cape Capetown, South Africa 20 th -22 nd June 2011.

dorit
Télécharger la présentation

Access Enabled, Access Denied: Supporting Inclusive Practice with Digital Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Access Enabled, Access Denied: Supporting Inclusive Practice with Digital Data Sue Watling - University of Lincoln, UK 11th International Conference on Diversity in Organisations, Communities and Nations University of the Western Cape Capetown, South Africa 20th-22nd June 2011

  2. Digital Landscapes • Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) • Promise of ‘transformative change’ • Widening opportunities • Potential for inclusive education but equal potential for exclusion • Digital divides ‘complex and dynamic phenomena’ (van Dijk 2003) • Digital divides ‘replicated and reinforced by social divides’ (Steyaert 2005)

  3. Digital Data • Advantages • 24/7 availability • Mobile • Transferable • Flexible • Customisable • Potential for equity of access

  4. Giesbert Nijhuis (Designer) Assistive Technology

  5. Changing digital landscapes • Web 1.0 to Web 2.0 • Read-only to interactivity • Consumer to Producer • Changing digital toolbox • User generated content • We can all be digital authors…

  6. MEE-Model

  7. Vision impairment

  8. Conclusion

  9. Digital literacies • Three layers to digital exclusion • Cost of access • Training and support • Inclusive digital practices • Promotion of digital literacies as both technical and social practices • The ‘social shaping’ of technology (Bjiker and Law 1992)

  10. Watling, S. (2011) Digital Exclusion: coming out from behind closed doors. Disability and Society 26 (4) 491:495 • Watling, S. (2011) Digital Exclusion: potential implications for social work education & practice. Journal of Social Work Education. 30 (1) • Watling, S. & Crawford, K.(2011) Digital Exclusion: implications for human services practitioners. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 28: 205:216 • Contact: swatling@lincoln.ac.uk • http://suewatling.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk

  11. References • Bijker, W. & Law, J. (eds.) (1992) Shaping Technology/Building Society: studies in socio-technical change London: MIT Press. • Deal, M. (2007) Aversive disablism: subtle prejudice toward disabled people Disability & Society 22 (1) 93:107 • Steyaert J. (2005) Web based higher education, the inclusion/exclusion paradox. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 23 (1/2) 67:78. • Van Dijk, J. & Hacker, K. (2003) The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon. The Information Society 19, (4), 315:326

More Related