1 / 9

Load Response Program Simplification for Efficient Implementation

Learn the reasons for the simplification of the program, proposed modifications, and examples illustrating the process. Understand why seeding the program and socializing installation costs can enhance effectiveness.

dotty
Télécharger la présentation

Load Response Program Simplification for Efficient Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LOAD RESPONSE PROGRAM Robert Burke February 13, 2001

  2. Agenda • Why Simplification was necessary • complexity of original proposal • proposed modifications • Example • After the summer • “Seeding” the program

  3. Why Simplification? • Original proposal included reallocation of the interrupted load to multiple suppliers • Determination of individual monthly peak load effected • Within Market Settlement System, this reallocation results in changes to “Load” • Lost revenue calculation and debits/credits • Lost revenue verification and auditability

  4. Proposed Modifications • Processed outside of the Market Settlement System • Eliminate reallocation • Eliminate lost revenue • Payments for interruption made to Participant that signed up customer • Cost allocated to Electric Load

  5. ExamplePrior to Interruption New Type 6 1 MW L.A.F.I. Signed by Comp. X Load Asset 10 MW Comp. A 50% - 5MW Comp. B 30% - 3MW Comp. C 20% - 2MW

  6. ExampleAfter Interruption New Type 6 1 MW L.A.F.I. Signed by Comp. X Load Asset 9 MW Comp. A 50% - 4.5MW Comp. B 30% - 2.7MW Comp. C 20% - 1.8MW 1MW interruption determined by ISO

  7. Example

  8. Example

  9. Seeding the Program • ISO proposed that the installation costs for the first 1,000 sites be socialized • Consistent with the installation of RIGs

More Related