1 / 12

FGDC Standards Process Review

Analysis of survey responses on FGDC standards review process for FY 2010. Data referral to editing committee due to volume. Step identification and time requirements discussed with low response rate.

dricks
Télécharger la présentation

FGDC Standards Process Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FGDC Standards Process Review • 70 attempts • After Question 1, only 37 people completed the survey

  2. Question 2.1 Identify one step and time requirements to comment on in support of mission requirements • Because of the volume of data, the responses are being referred to an editing committee 37 replied; 33 skipped

  3. Question 2.2 Identify a second step and time requirements to comment on in support of mission requirements • Because of the volume of data, the responses are being referred to an editing committee 30 replied; 40 skipped

  4. Question 2.3 Identify a third step and time requirements to comment on in support of mission requirements • Because of the volume of data, the responses are being referred to an editing committee 27 replied; 43 skipped

  5. Question 3.1 37 replied; 33 skipped

  6. Question 3.2 37 replied; 33 skipped

  7. Question 3.3 37 replied; 33 skipped

  8. Question 4 • Standards to submit to FGDC for review and recommendation in FY 2010 • North American Profile of ISO 19115 Geographic Information- Metadata and NAP of Methodology for Feature Cataloging • Addresses • Review of existing Wetlands Classification Standard • Cultural Resources Standard • Shoreline Data Standard • Buildings and Facilities (with GSA) 37 replied; 33 skipped

  9. Question 5 37 replied; 33 skipped

  10. Question 6 37 replied; 33 skipped

  11. Question 7 • What other activities should the SWG address this year? • Because of the volume of data, the responses are being referred to an editing committee 37 replied; 33 skipped

  12. Question 8 • Contact information • Agencies participating • DOI/USGS/FGDC: 5 • DOI/BLM: 4 • DOC/NOAA: 4 • USDA/NRCS: 4 • DOI/USGS: 3 • DOI/NPS: 3 • DOI/FWS: 2 • Library of Congress: 2 • DOC/Census: 1 • DOD/DISDI: 1 • EPA: 1 • DHS/FEMA: 1 • USDA/Forest Service: 1 • USDA/APHIS: 1 33 replied; 37 skipped

More Related