1 / 9

Last Call comments and changes for CCID 2

Last Call comments and changes for CCID 2. Sally Floyd DCCP WG, November 2004. Status:. The main feedback was from Mark Allman and Aaron Falk. No open questions. Topics : Why Byte Counting? Why at most one RTT sample per RTT? Minimum for ssthresh? Initial cwnd?

dstringer
Télécharger la présentation

Last Call comments and changes for CCID 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Last Call comments and changes for CCID 2 Sally Floyd DCCP WG, November 2004

  2. Status: • The main feedback was from Mark Allman and Aaron Falk. • No open questions. • Topics: • Why Byte Counting? • Why at most one RTT sample per RTT? • Minimum for ssthresh? • Initial cwnd? • CCID 2 masquerading as CCID 1?

  3. Mark: Why Byte Counting? It is only Experimental in TCP. • CCID2 has congestion control on the reverse path. • Mark: • "IMO, ABC with a limit of increasing cwnd by no more than 50% per RTT is the right answer." • Added to the next revision.

  4. The Ack Ratio: • "In a scenario where a sender's cwnd is rapidly changing, this could cause a lot of feature negotiation possibly during a period of congestion on the forward path." • "The sender SHOULD not attempt Ack Ratio renegotiations more than once per round-trip time."

  5. Why at most one RTT sample per RTT? • Added: • "If more that one round-trip time measurement per round-trip time was used for these calculations, then the weights of the averagers would have to be adjusted,so that the average round-trip time is effectively derived from measurements over multiple round-trip times."

  6. Minimum for ssthresh? • Changed from two to one. • "I don't think it actually makes any functional difference."

  7. ECN: • Specify that the congestion window is only increased for packets that aren't ECN-marked.

  8. Initial cwnd: • Clarified to make it clear that the exact rules of RFC 3390 apply.

  9. CCID 2 masquerading as CCID 1? • A moot point, now that CCID 1 has been removed from the main spec.

More Related