1 / 11

Pier Paolo Granieri, Rob van Weelderen CERN, Cryogenics group

International Conference on Magnet Technology July 14 – 19, 2013 The Westin Copley Place Boston, MA USA . Pier Paolo Granieri, Rob van Weelderen CERN, Cryogenics group.

duaa
Télécharger la présentation

Pier Paolo Granieri, Rob van Weelderen CERN, Cryogenics group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. International Conference on Magnet Technology July 14 – 19, 2013 The Westin Copley Place Boston, MA USA Pier Paolo Granieri, Rob van Weelderen CERN, Cryogenics group Deduction of steady-state cable quench limits for various electrical insulation schemes with application to LHC and HL-LHC magnets P.P. Granieri - Steady-state quench limits

  2. Introduction P.P. Granieri - Steady-state quench limits • Preventingbeaminducedquenchesrequires an accurateknowledge of the quenchlimits • Especially important for future LHC exploitation at 6.5 – 7 TeV • Comprehension of quenchlimitsisalso important for design of future SC magnets, as those for High Luminosity and High Energy LHC • The mechanismsdeterminingmagtnetsstabilitystronglydepend on the beamloss time scale • Wedescribe how to deducequenchlimitsfromheattransfermeasurements of stack of cables • canbeused to set thresholds for the BeamLoss Monitors • Outline • Experimental technique • Heattransferthroughcableelectricalinsulation • Deduction of quenchlimits: method • Quenchlimits of LHC main dipole and HL-LHC interaction regionsquadrupole

  3. Experimental technique P Cable center Cableedge P.P. Granieri - Steady-state quench limits • The mostwidespreadmethod to thermallycharacterize SC coilsis the so-calledstackmethod • It allows to measure the heattransferthrough the cable’selectricalinsulation • mostseverebarrier for heat extraction from the magnet • Measureheatextracted as a function of the cabletemperature • Under a controlled pressure

  4. Heattransferthroughcableelectricalinsulation • SSC: C. Meuris, B. Baudouy et al. • LHC MB and EI4: D. Richter, P.P. Granieri et al. • NB3Sn: P.P. Granieri et al. P.P. Granieri - Steady-state quench limits

  5. Heattransferthroughcableelectricalinsulation • SSC: C. Meuris, B. Baudouy et al. • LHC MB and EI4: D. Richter, P.P. Granieri et al. • NB3Sn: P.P. Granieri et al. P.P. Granieri - Steady-state quench limits

  6. Deduction of cablesteady-state quenchlimits mid-plane 11.8 kA, 5.4 T ΔTcs ΔTλ P.P. Granieri - Steady-state quench limits • For steady-state beamlosses, a quenchoccurs if TcableexceedsTcs(~ 4 K for Nb-Ti, ~ 7 K for Nb3Sn in a 1.9 K bath) • not Tλ, whichis a design limit for Nb-Ti coils • The cablequenchlimitsdepend on : • Heat extraction: • Cablecoolingwithin the magnet • Mechanical pressure, if Nb-Ti coil • Stackheating configuration • Operating conditions: • Transport current • Magneticfield, thuscable and strandconsidered

  7. Deduction of cablesteady-state quenchlimits: the method P.P. Granieri - Steady-state quench limits • 1) experimentallycorrelateheat extraction and strandstemperature • Heating configuration of the cables: typicallyheating all the cables • As a function of the mechanical pressure (for He II porous Nb-Ti coils) • In different positions of the cable (center vs. edge) • 2) scale the heat extraction to the coilgeometry • Only the innermostcables’ small face is in direct contact with the He II bath • The outermostsmall face canbe, depending on the magnet design, in contact with He • 3) computeTcs (Iop, B) • Cable location within the coil cross-section • Strand location within the cable cross-section • 4) compute the heatextractedatTcs (Iop, B) • At the pressure corresponding to the cable location within the coil cross-section • LHC dipole (MB): pressure varyingbtw 50 MPa (mid-plane) to 5 MPa (pole) • HL-LHC IR quad (MQXC): pressure varyingbtw120 MPa (mid-plane) to 25 MPa (pole) • HL-LHC IR quad (MQXF): no pressure

  8. Results MQXF P.P. Granieri - Steady-state quench limits Tbath = 1.9 K, held constant duringheatremoval The deducedquenchlimitsrefer to an averageheatdeposit over the cable Quench limit along the azimuthal direction:

  9. Results MQXF Heatdeposit data provided by L.S. Esposito, L. Skordis, F. Cerutti P.P. Granieri - Steady-state quench limits • Quench limit / heat deposit along the azimuthal direction • to determine the mostcriticalcables • for bothmagnets the mostheatedcables have unluckily the smallestquenchlimit

  10. Results LHC quench test data provided by S. Redaelli, L. Skordis et al. LHC collimation Review 2013: http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceOtherViews.py?view=standard&confId=251588 P.P. Granieri - Steady-state quench limits • Quench limit as a function of the transport current • in the mostcriticalregions, i.e. mid-plane for MB and close to the pole for MQXF

  11. Conclusion P.P. Granieri - Steady-state quench limits By measuringheattransfer on cablestacks, whiletakingintoaccount the cablecoolingwithin the magnet, one candetermine the quenchlimits Wepresented a generalmethod to determinesteady-state cablequenchlimits, basedupon the coolinggeometry, the coilmechanical and operating conditions The method has been successfullyapplied to LHC magnets and to magnetsforeseen for the High Luminosity upgrade

More Related