1 / 39

TMD Evolution

TMD Evolution. Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. TMDs: center piece of nucleon structure. QCD: Factorization, Universality, Evolution, Lattice, …. Nucleon Spin. Long. Momentum distributions. 3D imaging Transverse-momentum-dependent and Generalized PDFs.

duc
Télécharger la présentation

TMD Evolution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TMD Evolution Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

  2. TMDs: center piece of nucleon structure QCD: Factorization, Universality, Evolution, Lattice, … Nucleon Spin Long. Momentum distributions 3D imaging Transverse-momentum-dependent and Generalized PDFs

  3. TMDs at small-x • kt-dependence crucial to the saturation

  4. TMDs in valence region Alex Prokudin @EIC-Whitepaper Quark Sivers function leads to an azimuthal asymmetric distribution of quark in the transverse plane

  5. Evolution is crucial to strength the TMD probes • Two particle correlations from pp to dAu Evolution? Saturation?

  6. Sign change of Sivers asymmetry Drell-Yan, π- (190GeV)p COMPASS Q2~16-30GeV2 Q2~3-6GeV2

  7. Outlines • General theory background • Applying to single spin asymmetries • Consistent resummation in high enegy • BFKL vs Sudakov

  8. Collinear vs TMD factorization • TMD factorization is an extension and simplification to the collinear factorization • Extends to the region where collinear fails • Simplifies the kinematics • Power counting, correction 1/Q neglected (PT,Q)=H(Q) f1(k1T,Q) f2(k2T, Q) S(T) • There is no x- and kt-dependence in the hard factor

  9. DGLAP vs CSS • DGLAP for integrated parton distributions • One hard scale (Q)=H(Q/) f1()… • Collins-Soper-Sterman for TMDs • Two scales, large double logs

  10. Evolution vs resummation • Any evolution is to resum large logarithms • DGLPA resum single large logarithms • CSS evolution resum double logarithms

  11. Sudakov Large Double Logarithms Sudakov, 1956 • Differential cross section depends on Q1, where Q2>>Q12>>2QCD • We have to resum these large logs to make reliable predictions • QT: Dokshitzer, Diakonov, Troian, 78; Parisi Petronzio, 79; Collins, Soper, Sterman, 85 • Threshold: Sterman 87; Catani and Trentadue 89

  12. How Large of the Resummation effects Resum NLO Kulesza, Sterman, Vogelsang, 02

  13. Collins-Soper-Sterman Resummation • Introduce a new concept, the Transverse Momentum Dependent PDF • Prove the Factorization in terms of the TMDs (PT,Q)=H(Q) f1(k1T,Q) f2(k2T, Q) S(T) • Large Logs are resummed by solving the energy evolution equation of the TMDs (Collins-Soper 81, Collins-Soper-Sterman 85)

  14. CSS Formalism (II) • K and G obey the renormalization group eq. • The large logs will be resummed into the exponential form factor • A,B,C functions are perturbative calculable. (Collins-Soper-Sterman 85)

  15. Two Large Scales Processes • Very success in applications, • DIS and Drell-Yan at small PT (QT Resum) • DIS and Drell-Yan at large x (Threshold Resum) • Higgs production at small PT or large x • Thrust distribution • Jet shape function • … ResBos: Nadolsky, et al., PRD 2003 CSS resummation built in

  16. Single Transverse Spin Asymmetry • Separate the singular and regular parts • TMD factorization in b-space Kang, Xiao, Yuan, PRL 11; Rogers et al., PRD, 2012

  17. Evolution equations Idilbi-Ji-Ma-Yuan, PRD04 Boer, NPB, 2002

  18. Final resum form • Sudakov the same

  19. Coefficients at one-loop order

  20. Constraints from SIDIS Sun, Yuan, 1308.5003

  21. DIS and Drell-Yan • Initial state vs. final state interactions • “Universality”: QCD prediction * * DIS Drell-Yan HERMES/COMPASS

  22. Predictions for COMPASS Drell-Yan, π- (190GeV)p COMPASS Q2~16-30GeV2 Q2~3-6GeV2

  23. Fermilab Drell-Yan 120GeV proton beam

  24. Few words on Drell-Yan at RHIC • Never been measured before at a collider • Fixed target • W/Z at Tevatron/LHC • Understand the x-evolution of the TMDs, saturation? • Compared to that from HERA

  25. Drell-Yan at Fixed Target QT spectrum from E288, PRD23,604(81) Valence region

  26. At very large Q2 (e.g., Z0 and W boson), No longer a Gaussian

  27. Predictions at RHIC Additional theory uncertainties: x-dependence of the TMDs comes from a fit to fixed target drell-yan and w/z production at Tevatron ---Nadolsky et al. √S = 500GeV Drell-Yan Q=6GeV Sun, Yuan, 1308.5003

  28. y=0 y=0 Pt(GeV) √S = 510GeV Pt(GeV) -0.06 -0.06 Rapidity of W Rapidity of W

  29. QCD evolution reduces the asymmetries about a factor of 3 for W/Z as compared to Drell-Yan

  30. Uniqueness of forward RHIC physics • Investigate the sign change of Sivers asymmetries and the associated QCD evolution effects in Drell-Yan and W SSAs • Mapping out the saturation physics in di-hadron and single-hadron production in forward pAcollisions Complementary to the EIC Missions!!

  31. Kt-dependent observables • Hard processes probe the kt-dependent gluon distributions directly • Saturation phenomena manifest in the observables • Xiao,Yuan, et al, PRL106, 022301 (2011) PRL105, 062001 (2010) PJ>>KT KT CSS

  32. Resummation: Sudakov vs BFKL • Sudakov double logs can be re-summed in the small-x saturation formalism • Radiated gluon momentum • Soft gluon, α~β<<1 • Collinear gluon, α~1, β<<1 • Small-x collinear gluon, 1-β<<1, α0 • Rapidity divergence Mueller, Xiao, Yuan, PRL110,082301 (2013); arXiv:1308.2993

  33. Final result • Double logs at one-loop order • Collins-Soper-Sterman resummation

  34. Comments • Sudakov double logs can be re-summed consistently in the small-x formalism • Kinematics of double logs and small-x evolution are well separated • Soft vs collinear gluons • If Qs is small, back to dilute region • If Qs is large (~Q), we can safely neglect the Sudakov effects

  35. Sudakov leading double logs: general hard processes • Each incoming parton contributes to a half of the associated color factor • Initial gluon radiation, aka, TMDs • Soft gluon radiation in collinear calculation also demonstrates this rule • Sterman, et al • Sub-leading logs will be much complicated, usually a matrix form Mueller, Xiao, Yuan, PRL110,082301 (2013); arXiv:1308.2993

  36. all order factorization Similar calculations for pp collisions: Zhu HX, et al., PRL110 (2013) 082001

  37. Dijet azimuthal correlation at colliders LO preliminary NLL- resummation Peng Sun, et al. will be extended to di-hadrons, PRL 94, 221801 (2005)

  38. Two particle correlations in Central dAu collisions • η1~η2~3.2 • Q2sA~0.85A(1/3) Qsp2 Stasto,Xiao,Yuan,PLB716,430(2012)

  39. Conclusions • TMDs are important tool to investigate the partonic structure of nucleon/nucleus, and the associated QCD dynamics • Although complicated, the evolution effects have been well understood • Provide solid ground for phen. Applications • Unique place to study QCD

More Related