1 / 4

MUSC College of Graduate Studies Postdoctoral Retreat on the Responsible Conduct of Research “Moral Reasoning” Ed Krug

MUSC College of Graduate Studies Postdoctoral Retreat on the Responsible Conduct of Research “Moral Reasoning” Ed Krug CRI607 792-1543 krugel@musc.edu. 12/04/2009. “Developing a well-reasoned response to moral problem in scientific research” Muriel J. Bebeau, Univ. Minn.

duke
Télécharger la présentation

MUSC College of Graduate Studies Postdoctoral Retreat on the Responsible Conduct of Research “Moral Reasoning” Ed Krug

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MUSC College of Graduate Studies Postdoctoral Retreat on the Responsible Conduct of Research “Moral Reasoning” Ed Krug CRI607 792-1543 krugel@musc.edu 12/04/2009

  2. “Developing a well-reasoned response to moral problem in scientific research” Muriel J. Bebeau, Univ. Minn. Moral Reasoning Issues: 1) What are the issues or points of conflict? 2) Who are the interested parties? 3) What are their legitimate expectations of each interested party? 4) What are the potential courses of action that each party might take? 5) What are the potential consequences of these actions? 6) What are the moral obligations or each interested party? 7) Are the potential actions of the interested parties grounded in moral considerations? MJ Bebeau et al. (1995). Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research: Cases for Teaching and Assessment.

  3. Issues or Points of Conflict • Describe the nature of the moral conflict • What are the situations in which the rights or obligations of interested parties are in conflict? Interested Parties • Who other than those directly presented in the conflict have an interest? • Often reveals hidden issues Consequences of Action • Identify those that have the highest probability of occurring or the greatest impact first • Often suggests several possible outcomes Obligations • What are the responsibilities of each individual to other interested parties? • Are these grounded in moral considerations or are they a rationalization?

  4. “Heinz and the Druggist” Heinz’s wife is dying. A cure is available from a druggist in Heinz’s town. The druggist is the one who discovered the drug. However, the druggist charges much more for the drug than it costs him to make it, and much more than Heinz can afford to pay. Heinz can’t raise the money and the druggist will not agree to let him pay later. MJ Bebeau et al. (1995). Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research: Cases for Teaching and Assessment.

More Related