1 / 28

Why are social factors important in genetics (and vice-versa )?

Why are social factors important in genetics (and vice-versa )?. Andrew Pickles University of Manchester. Methodological challenges for the Twenty-First Century RMP Meeting 22-23 Nov 2007. Rapid Change. Wholesale change of material since spoke to this topic some 3-4 years ago

Télécharger la présentation

Why are social factors important in genetics (and vice-versa )?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.


Presentation Transcript

  1. Why are social factors important in genetics (and vice-versa)? Andrew Pickles University of Manchester Methodological challenges for the Twenty-First Century RMP Meeting 22-23 Nov 2007

  2. Rapid Change • Wholesale change of material since spoke to this topic some 3-4 years ago • Previously material still relevant • concerned to contrast environmental variation in population means from variations in within population individual differences where estimates of additive genetic variance dominate and wider “shared” social factors often apparently negligible. • How heritabilities need careful interpretation and can be entirely environmentally contingent • Nature versus nurturecontrast as unhelpful

  3. Genetics versus environment: false dichotomy DNA is verydistal to the outcomes of interest - there are many intermediate stages at which the environment and the social will modulate genetic effects and vice-versa. There are fewer genes than expected (e.g. too few for even blue-print of just the brain). Normal development requires environmental input. The process of gene expression is proving to be much more complicated than expected.

  4. What is the effect of a gene? • Depends on who you are (other genes and proximal social factors) • Depends on where you are (social context) • Depends on your developmental stage • Depends on what has happened to you

  5. Gene-environment interaction Environmentally contingent expression Dunedin Cohort Study (Caspi, Moffitt et al)

  6. MAOA, maltreatment and antisocial behaviour

  7. ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR AS A FUNCTION OF MAOA ACTIVITY AND A CHILDHOOD HISTORY OF MALTREATMENT (from Caspi et al., 2002) Composite index of antisocial behavior (z scores) Childhood maltreatment

  8. Serotonin transporter gene, life events and depression

  9. EFFECT OF LIFE STRESS ON DEPRESSION MODERATED BY 5-HTT GENE (from Caspi et al., 2003) s/s = short allele homozygous l/l = long allele homozygous s/l = heterozygous s/s s/l l/l Probability of major depression episode Number of stressful life events

  10. COMT, cannabis and schizophrenia

  11. SCHIZOPHRENIA SPECTRUM DISORDER:CANNABIS USE INTERACTS WITH GENOTYPE(Caspi et al., 2005) COMT genotype Met/Met Met/Val Val/Val %schizophreniform disorder

  12. Learning provides a mechanism for persisting effectsBiological systems can learn although this is often referred to as “programming”

  13. Example Systems Immunological response is largely programmed through exposure in early life High risk genotypes (over responding) may benefit from early social exposure to risk agent Neglect can be protective for asthma Day-care can be protective for juvenile onset leukemia What are the kinds of detailed mechanics that could give rise to these effects? A proof of concept

  14. Stress, Cortisol and the HPA system

  15. Genotypes can confer advantage or disadvantage depending upon the environment. How could disadvantage be moderated? • Anxiety is disadvantageous when the environment is benign Q: How does a mother rat “teach” a pup with a gene that predisposes for anxiety to be less anxious? A: She stops the gene from being expressed.

  16. How does she do that?By licking the pup a lot!

  17. Licking and stress response • The pups with the gene predsiposing for a more anxious response but who are licked more are less fearful, they produce less stress hormones when provoked and their heart rate doesn't go up as much. • The licking had to have occurred in the first six days of life. This is now known to be an example of epigenetics

  18. Epigenetics DNA does not just hang about in the cell with each bit ready for haphazard transcription and protein production. The DNA strands are organised Histonesandmethylation

  19. Maternal behaviour, methylation and pup behaviour • Some rat pups inherit a gene variant for cortisol that can make them anxious. At birth it is unmethylated. • If the rat pup is licked a lot in the first six days, a single methyl group (CH3) becomes attached at one specific location on the DNA in brain cells. • This makes it impossible for the gene to be transcribed. The gene is silenced by the mother rats behaviour and the rat pup is placid. • Remove the methyl group (can be done chemically) and the rat pup reverts to being anxious, consistent with its genotype.

  20. Many concepts, skills and fields of research • Careful description of social behaviour and social development • Inter-generational cultural transmission (in fact occurs beyond parent child to grand-parent child because some aspects of methylation can be heritable) • Developmental biology • Detailed organ specific gene-expression, cell biology, experimental design (cross-fostering), pathology etc

  21. Genetics and inference for causal environmental effects Discordant twins Mendelian randomisation

  22. MZ (Identical) co-twin controls • In longitudinal studies we might control for omitted variables by examining how change in outcome (difference between time 1 and time 2) is associated with change in environmental exposure • MZ differences in outcome can be similarly compared with differences in exposure

  23. Path DiagramInstrumental Variable Model Note: Errors E2 and E3 are correlated (unmeasured confounder) V1 has no direct effect on V3. This is the exclusion restriction

  24. Finding plausible IVs is the problem Can we find genes that might meet the exclusion restriction • Does alcohol causally increase risk of depression or do depressed people self-medicate with alcohol? • There is a genotype that gives deficient alcholol dehydrogenase. Individuals with this genotype (10% UK, 50% in Japan) enjoy alcohol less and drink less. • Using this genotype as an instrument (Mendelian randomisation) suggests alcohol increases risk of depression.

  25. Conclusions • For social and many health outcomes effects of genes are socially mediated and moderated • Time-restricted social inputs can have time-persistent effects through programming. Epigenetics provides one such mechanism. • Genetic designs provide another tool for unravelling social processes • We need social science informed genetics and genetically informed social science.

More Related