1 / 47

Definition of anisotropic denoising operators via sectional curvature Stanley Durrleman

Definition of anisotropic denoising operators via sectional curvature Stanley Durrleman. September 19, 2006. The problem. crest. coast. Purpose : Denoising homogeneous areas… …without smoothing the signal at the interfaces. The problem. Autoregressive model :. The problem.

dusty
Télécharger la présentation

Definition of anisotropic denoising operators via sectional curvature Stanley Durrleman

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Definition of anisotropic denoising operators viasectional curvatureStanley Durrleman Air Systems Division September 19, 2006

  2. The problem crest coast Purpose : Denoising homogeneous areas… …without smoothing the signal at the interfaces Air Systems Division

  3. The problem Autoregressive model : Air Systems Division

  4. The problem Autoregressive model : Air Systems Division

  5. The problem Autoregressive model : Air Systems Division

  6. The problem Autoregressive model : • Burg algorithm enables : • better estimation in case of short sample signals • fewer interference peaks • recursive computation : real time algorithm • estimation of the spectral density function : Air Systems Division

  7. The problem Images du CR 1 magnitude angle • Example : record of turbulent atmospheric clutter Air Systems Division

  8. What’s in the image proceesing toolbox ? • Statistical models of noise Bayesian models, Markov fields… : - good model of noise - how to take the geometry into account ? • Geometrical models : Linear filters (Gaussian,…) : do not preserve the discontinuities Non-linear filters : • Curvature motion & morphologic filters (AMSS, mean curvature motion, median filter) : - noise = level set of small areas - specific for gray-level images • Geometric filters : (Kimmel, Sochen, Barbaresco) : - model data as a sub-manifold - depend on the way data are parametrized (mean curvature flow) - model of noise ? • Our goal : define anisotropic operators that can denoise data… • of any dimension (gray-level images, radar signal…) • independently of the data parametrization • and restore piecewise constant data Air Systems Division

  9. Outline • Noise characterization via sectional curvature • De-noising algorithms • Results Air Systems Division

  10. I. Noise characterization through sectional curvature MIA – September 19, 2006 Air Systems Division

  11. I. Noise & Sectional Curvature • 1. Question : what is noise ?? • statistics : Bayesian filters, maximum likelihood… • geometry : which tool ? • Gradient ? • Curvature ! Air Systems Division

  12. I. Noise & Sectional Curvature • 2- Basic idea : the surface Gaussian Curvature Air Systems Division

  13. I. Noise & Sectional Curvature • 2- Basic idea : the surface Gaussian Curvature Examples : Air Systems Division

  14. I. Noise & Sectional Curvature • Noise and curvature Axiom : pixel of noise = pixel of big curvature Air Systems Division

  15. I. Noise & Sectional Curvature • How to denoise ? • By minimizing the following energy : Air Systems Division

  16. I. Noise & Sectional Curvature • 3 – Modeling • A generic ‘image’ : Air Systems Division

  17. I. Noise & Sectional Curvature • 3 – Modeling Air Systems Division

  18. I. Noise & Sectional Curvature • 3 – Modeling Curvature of a metric : Air Systems Division

  19. I. Noise & Sectional Curvature • 3 – Modelisation Curvature of a metric : That is the surface Gaussian curvature ! Air Systems Division

  20. I. Noise & Sectional Curvature • Summary : • 1/ One defines : • h metric on the data space • e metric on the acquisition space • => a ‘mixed’ metric : g • 2/ One computes the sectional curvature: K • 3/ One defines the energy : E Air Systems Division

  21. II. De-noising algorithms MIA’06 - September 19, 2006 Air Systems Division

  22. II. De-noising algorithms • Purpose : • Minimizing : • 2 methods : • - Partial Differential Equation • - Stochastic algorithm Air Systems Division

  23. II. De-noising algorithms • Descent gradient scheme : 1/ initialise with the given noisy image • 2/ Evolve towards a minimum of : • using the gradient : • Hence, the evolution equation : implemented with a finite difference scheme. Air Systems Division

  24. II. De-noising algorithms • Case of gray-level images : Air Systems Division

  25. II. De-noising algorithms • 2. Stochastic method : • - One picks randomly a pixel in the (noisy) image. • - One adds a small random Gaussian variable to the pixel’s value. • - If the energy decreases : one keeps the change • Else : the change is rejected. Air Systems Division

  26. III. Results MIA’06 - September 19, 2006 Air Systems Division

  27. III. Results • 1 – Gray-level images (1) • Metric : • Curvature : • Flow : Air Systems Division

  28. III. Results Flow equation t = 0 t = 1 t = 10 t = 100 Air Systems Division

  29. III. Results • Transversal view : Air Systems Division

  30. III. Results Stochastic algorithm : Stochastic Stoch. + PDE Air Systems Division

  31. III. Results 2 – Gray level images (2) Adaptative metric : ‘Dilate’ geodesics in D far from the minimum Air Systems Division

  32. III. Results Stoch. Algo. Adaptative metric original PDE Air Systems Division

  33. III. Results median Air Systems Division

  34. III. Results • RSO Image PDE amss Stoch original Air Systems Division

  35. III. Results • 2. Radar signal Reminder : Parametrization thanks to complex auto-regressive analysis Doppler spectrum 7 reflection coefficients 8 complex magnitudes Burg Algo. Air Systems Division

  36. III. Results • Data : Reflection coefficients Air Systems Division

  37. III. Results Image of CR 1 : • Simulated data : magnitude angle azimut 16 Air Systems Division

  38. III. Results Image of CR 1 : • Simulated data : magnitude angle azimut 16 Air Systems Division

  39. III. Results • After de-noising: Air Systems Division

  40. III. Results • After de-noising : Air Systems Division

  41. III. Results Images du CR 1 • Real data : angle magnitude azimut 19 Air Systems Division

  42. III. Results • After de-noising : Air Systems Division

  43. Thank you for your kind attention MIA’06 - September 19, 2006 Air Systems Division

  44. Air Systems Division

  45. Air Systems Division

  46. Air Systems Division

  47. Air Systems Division

More Related