1 / 27

2010-13 Reflections on Evaluation and Continuous Improvement: Differentiated Instruction (DI)

Discover the implementation and impact of Differentiated Instruction (DI) in education, focusing on research-based practices for teaching literacy and effective strategies for English Learners (ELs). Learn about the integration of technology and lessons on sustainability and institutionalization.

dvalentino
Télécharger la présentation

2010-13 Reflections on Evaluation and Continuous Improvement: Differentiated Instruction (DI)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2010-13 Reflections on Evaluation and Continuous Improvement: Differentiated Instruction (DI) RCOE Division of Educational Services Mike Barney: Director II Melissa Bazanos: Administrator Russell Frank: Director II Kris Nicholls: Coordinator Maritza Rodriguez: Ass’t Dean & Director of Teacher Education: UCR Kira Shearer: Coordinator

  2. Questions for Regional Partners What lessons about sustainability or institutionalization can you offer? What about technology integration can you recommend?

  3. DI Implementation Influences Research-based practices for teaching literacy, especially effective with ELs, connected to or building on LEA/site pre-existing PD context Implementation Science: Fixsen Influencer

  4. 2010-11 RSIU Unit Goals • Increase the percent of English Learners: • Scoring proficient or higher in ELA as measured by district benchmarks. * • Scoring proficient or higher on CST in ELA and math. • Achieving English proficiency as measured by CELDT

  5. How Did We Do with Our Goals? 2009-12 CST Data 09-12 CELDT English Proficient Riv Cty Sta Cl Cty ’09 37 39 ’12 41 43 Gain 4 4 District benchmark assessments are a challenge to measure growth. Riv Cty CA ELA ’09 34.3 33.3 ’12 40.5 40.6 Gain 6.2 7.3 Math ’09 43.2 42.8 ’12 49.0 48.8 Gain 5.8 6.7

  6. 2013-14 DI Goal • Implement DI to facilitate transition to Common Core State Standards/ ELD Standards

  7. 2010: What We Did • Provide 18 hours of EL-focused DI professional development to eligible PI schools in eligible districts. • Provide principal coaching during walk-throughs to support implementation and monitoring of DI. • Funded through Regional System of District and School Support.

  8. 2013: What’s Been Added? • Year 2: Lesson planning process. Deeper rigor and principal coaching. Originally developed to help EL students – helps all. Learning Walks. • Year 3: Deepen lesson planning. Focus more on CCSS. More trouble-shooting with principal and DO. LEA/site develops own monitoring docs and Learning Walks

  9. Memorandum of Understanding • MOU guides support & accountability for: • Assistant Superintendent • Directors • Principals • Coaches • Teachers • RSIU Staff

  10. Memorandum of Understanding • MOU outlines responsibi- lities for most Implemen -tation Science Drivers: • Training • Coaching • Systems Intervention • Facilitative Intervention • Decision Support Data • Adaptive/Technical Leadership

  11. Data • Add chart here.

  12. Data • Add chart here.

  13. What Works? Defining the “What”: Revised Practice Profiles

  14. What Works? Revised Lesson Plan Organizer

  15. 2010-13 Lessons Learned • From Walkthrus to Learning Walks • Building on or connection to existing district/site PD context • Principal and RCOE staff dialogue w/ teacher • On learning walks teachers see for themselves why the school might be stalled. • From Walkthrus to Learning Walks • How someone else doesit “with kids like mine”. • If numbers get in the way take them out. • It’s about the conversation that moves implementation ahead. • “Come back in 10 minutes, I want to show you something.”

  16. Learning Walks Learning from peers in authentic settings Observing high levels of learning for all students Melissa Bazanos Administrator Riverside County Office of Education

  17. What Works? Teacher Reflection on DI Implementation: Innovation • Created by a school in year 3. • Customized • Used in that school.

  18. What Works? Reflection Prompts: Innovation

  19. What Works? Observation Matrix: Innovation

  20. What Works? Shopping List

  21. What Works? Tech Apps. • Not about using tech for implemen- tation data • Photos & videos of implementation used at trainings show rich variations. • Celebrate good work.

  22. What Works? Tech Apps.

  23. What Didn’t Work • District Implosion is Bad: • Teachers • Principals • DO • No Expectation for Follow-up • Morale

  24. What Works? Improved Student Achievement

  25. What Works? Improved Student Achievement

  26. What Works? Improved Student Achievement

  27. Questions for Regional Partners What lessons about sustainability or institutionalization can you offer? What about technology integration can you recommend?

More Related