110 likes | 215 Vues
Update in ESC: Dabigatran among OAC. Department of Cardiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan Professor, Ken Okumura. Age 81 Female (Living alone, ADL: independent ) Chronic AF HT(-), No heart disease, DM(-), LAD 43mm. dementia. nose bleed. dementia. dementia.
E N D
Update in ESC: Dabigatran among OAC Department of Cardiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan Professor, Ken Okumura
Age 81 Female (Living alone, ADL: independent ) Chronic AFHT(-), No heart disease, DM(-), LAD 43mm dementia nose bleed dementia dementia Stroke Warfarin(2002~) 2.5mg 2.5mg aspirin 2.5mg 1.5mg 4 3.53 3 2.16 2.15 2.1 2.13 PT-INR 2 1.35 1.54 1.16 1.36 1 0.91 0.87 0.81 0.81 0.78 0 2004 Jan 2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Oct Nov Dec Feb Mar Apr
Age 81 Female(Living alone, ADL: independent ) Chronic AFHT(-), No heart disease, DM(-), LAD 43mm 29th 4,2005 14th 5,2005
mRS by subtype of brain infaction(HIROSAKI Stroke and Rehabilitation Center) n=768 (Oct, 2005~Jan, 2008) m-Rankin scale No symptoms 0 Lacunar (n=215) Able to carry out all usual activities 1 Able to look after own affairs without assistance 2 Atherothrombotic infarction (n=308) Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted 3 Unable to walk unassisted 4 31% 54% Cerebral embolism (n=245) Bedridden 5 Dead 6 0 20 40 60 80 100 (%) Ken Okumura, Norihumi Metoki, Jyoji HagiiJapanese Journal of Electrocardiology2011;31:292-296
Prevalence of AF among Cerebral embolism patients: 267 consecutive patients during 2008-2009 (HIROSAKI Stroke and Rehabilitation Center) Data from previous Dr & ECG during hospitalization ECG on admission AF(-) n=67 (25%) AF(-) n=128 (48%) AF(+) n=139 (52%) Sustained AF n=120 (45%) paroxysmal AF n=80 (30%) Ken Okumura, Norihumi Metoki, Jyoji HagiiJapanese Journal of Electrocardiology2011;31:292-296
Severity of stroke by AF type Sustained AF vsParoxysmal AF vsNot defined AF (HIROSAKI Stroke and Rehabilitation Center) Percentage of patients with mRS = 4,5,6 (P=NS) Percentage ofpatients with internal carotid artery stenosis (P=NS) Sustained (n=120) 23 97 57 63 Paroxysmal (n=80) 12 68 33 47 Not defined AF (n=67) 9 58 25 42 0 20 40 60 80 100 (%) 0 20 40 60 80 100 (%) *Patients with acute stroke within 3 hours of onset were treated with tPA
CHADS2 Score and Severity of stroke CHADS2=0,1 Score (n=41)vs CHADS2=2-6 Score(n=159) (HIROSAKI Stroke and Rehabilitation Center) Percentage of patients with mRS = 4,5,6 (P=NS) Percentage ofpatients with internal carotid artery stenosis (P=NS) CHADS2=0,1 (n=41) 9 32 17 24 CHADS2=2-6 (n=159) 34 125 73 86 0 20 40 60 80 100 (%) 0 20 40 60 80 100 (%)
The Japanese Society of Electrocardiology J-RHYTHM Registry CHADS2 Score of registered AF patients (n=7,937) J-RHYTHM Registry J-RHYTHM Registry (%) 35 30 (cases) 100 25 80 18.2% 20 Incidence for stroke National Registry of AF 60 15 12.5% 40 8.5% 10 5.9% 4.0% 20 5 2.8% 1.9% 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 CHADS2 Score
Net Clinical Benefit in ATRIA Study (Singer DE, et al. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:297-305) 13,559 adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (73 years median age; Male 57%; more than 66,000 person-years of observation; 53% of patients were receiving warfarin treatment.) → 1,092 thromboembolic events, 299 intracranial hemorrhagic events 2.22 4-6 0.58 3.75 2.07 3 1.21 2.79 0.97 CHADS2 score 2 0.43 1.41 0.19 Net clinical benefit of warfarin =0.68%/yr Net clinical benefit of patients with Prior Stroke =2.48%/yr 1 -0.27 0.45 -0.11 0 -0.44 0.20 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Worse with Warfarin Better with Warfarin Net Clinical Benefit =(TE rate off warfarin −TE rate on warfarin) − 1.5 x (ICH rate on warfarin −ICH rateoff warfarin)
Intracranial hemorrhage rate Intracranial hemorrhage: Hemorrhagic Stroke (Intracerebral hemorrhage), Subdural hematoma and Subarachnoid hemorrhage RR 0.41 (95%CI: 0.28–0.60) P<0.001 RR 0.30 (95%CI: 0.19–0.45) P<0.001 1.0 Event rate (% per year) 0.8 0.76 0.6 RRR 59% 0.4 RRR 70% 0.32 0.2 0.23 0 Dabigatran 150mg bid (n=38/6,076) Dabigatran 110mg bid (n=27/6,015) Warfarin (n=90/6,022) Connolly SJ, et al: N Engl J Med 361, 1139-1151, 2009 Connolly SJ, et al: N Engl J Med 363, 1875-1876, 2010
Urgent Statement on Antithrombotic Therapy of Atrial Fibrillation : JCS Guideline Statement (Aug.2011) Mitral stenosis or mechanical valve Non-valvular AF Other risk factors Cardiomyopathy 65 to 74 years old Female patients Coronary heart disease Thyrotoxicosis CHADS2Score Heart failure 1point Hypertension 1point ≥75years old 1point Diabetes 1point History of cerebral infarction or TIA 2points ≥2points 1point Recommended Recommended Considered Considered Warfarin INR2.0to 3.0 for < 70 years old INR1.6to 2.6 for ≥ 70 years old Warfarin INR2.0to 3.0 for < 70 years old INR1.6to 2.6 for ≥ 70 years old Warfarin INR2.0to 3.0 for < 70 years old INR1.6to 2.6 for ≥ 70 years old Warfarin INR2.0~3.0 Dabigatran Recommended Dabigatran Dabigatran JCS: Urgent Statement 2011http://www.j-circ.or.jp/guideline/pdf/statement.pdf