SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Sociological Theoretical Perspectives

earl avatar
13 diapositives · 415 Views · Jul 27, 2014

Sociological Theoretical Perspectives. What do you see????. Which man is bigger????. Is it a duck or a rabbit????. Is it an awning or a circus tent????. A young woman or a grouchy clown? .

Sociological Theoretical Perspectives - slide 1
01 / 13Sociological Theoretical Perspectives
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Sociological Theoretical Perspectives
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Sociological Theoretical Perspectives

  2. What do you see????

  3. Which man is bigger????

  4. Is it a duck or a rabbit????

  5. Is it an awning or a circus tent????

  6. A young woman or a grouchy clown?

  7. Although there are many sociological theories, most fall under one or more of three major theories: • Structural functionalism • Symbolic Interactionism • Conflict Theory

  8. Structural Functionalism • Derived from Durkheim and follows from The Social Facts Paradigm. View of Society/Characteristics/Premises -“natural laws” govern society-system of interrelated and interdependent parts-parts must fulfill certain functions for smooth operation of society-society is objective, stable, and cohesive-order = consensus of members on common values-parts have fixed social roles-society has requisite (necessary) needs-dysfunctions are some times functional for society

  9. Structural Functionalism Weaknesses and Criticisms: -conservative and idealistic view of society-underplays power differences among and between groups-ignores conflict and diversity as inherent aspects of reality-bias toward balance/equilibrium

  10. SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM • Derived from Blumer, Mead, and Goffman...originating from Weber...and follows from The Social Definition Paradigm. View of Society/Characteristics/Premises: -micro level analysis-ongoing process of social interaction (taking each other into account in discernable ways)-individuals in face to face interaction create social consensus of meanings and definitions-like a “stage” where people define and redefine meanings as they interact-collective interaction-perceptions of reality are variable and changing-subjective---reality perceived in the minds of people-inequality demonstrated through meaning of status symbols-symbols of communication (language, thoughts, behaviors)

  11. SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM Weaknesses and Criticisms: -overstates subjective basis of society-weak analysis of inequality-ignores material differences between groups-ignores structure and social forces-not synergistic-limits itself to micro level analysis with no connection to other levels

  12. CONFLICT THEORY • Derived from Marx...and follows from a combination/synthesis. View of Society/Characteristics/Premises: -conditions giving rise to conflict-inclusive of all levels and analysis of them-Change is about internal arrangements AND about the system itself-Change is historical...temporal...ABOUT the system, not just within it-Change can be revolutionary...often quick and total-Change is inevitable given consciousness and material conditions

  13. CONFLICT THEORY Weaknesses and Criticisms: -understates degree of cohesion and stability-little micro level analysis-ignores competition-is a “shadow” structural functionalism -appears to be reductionist (i.e. economics)-too open ended...appears to lead to chaos