1 / 24

OAIster: Metadata Pointing to Digital Objects

This project aims to make OAI-enabled metadata for digital objects accessible to the public. It provides a one-stop shopping platform for freely accessing digital objects of any subject matter and format, without any dead ends. The project utilizes the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign open-source OAI protocol harvester and Java edition for Unix environment.

earlg
Télécharger la présentation

OAIster: Metadata Pointing to Digital Objects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OAIster: Metadata Pointing to Digital Objects Kat Hagedorn Metadata Harvesting/DLXS Librarian University of Michigan Libraries February 18, 2004

  2. background • One-year Mellon grant project to test the feasibility of making OAI-enabled metadata for digital objects accessible to the public • Digital Library Production Service at University of Michigan Libraries began work in December 2001 • Launched in June 2002

  3. highlights • Any audience • Any subject matter • Any format • Freely accessible • No dead ends • One-stop shopping …retrieving the “hidden web”

  4. tool we borrowed • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign open-source OAI protocol harvester • java edition for our unix environment • Worked collaboratively to iron out kinks • resumptionToken / retryAfter • inexplicable kill • bogus records in MySQL table

  5. development environment • Digital Library Extension Service (DLXS) • Develop open-source middleware and license XPAT search engine for building and mounting digital libraries • Middleware consists of document classes, i.e., Text, Image, Bib, FindAid • Originally designed to make SGML encoded texts available online

  6. tool we developed • Runs in DLXS environment using BibClass • Current BibClass web templates modified • Additional java-based transformation tool to: • DC metadata records concatenated • No-digital-object records filtered out • Records counted • Conversion from UTF-8 to ISO-8859-1 • XSLT used to transform DC records into BibClass records

  7. system design XSL stylesheets (per source type) UIUC harvester XSLT transformation tool OAI-enabled DC records Record storage Non-OAI-enabled DC records Search interface (XPAT) BibClass indexes

  8. result • One place to look for digital objects • Big • 3,016,251 metadata records • 267 institutions (as of last week…) • Popular • Averages 3300 search sessions / month • Picked up in March ‘03: average 3500 now • 43,894 searches in one year (June 2002 – July 2003)

  9. repositories: e.g., • arXiv Eprint Archive: math and physics pre- and post-prints • Online Archive of California: manuscripts, photographs, and works of art held in institutions across California • Sammelpunkt, Elektronisch Archivierte Theorie: archive of philosophical publications • British Women Romantic Poets Project: collection of poems written by British women between 1789 and 1832

  10. repositories: stats • As of February ‘04, out of 267 repositories… • International and U.S. • U.S.: 50.5% (135) • Intl: 49.5% (132) • By subject • Humanities: 24% (65) • Science: 30% (81) • Mixed: 46% (121) • E-prints and pre-prints • Using eprints.org software: 39% (104) • Not using eprints.org software: 61% (163)

  11. major issues encountered • Metadata variation • Records not leading to digital objects • Access restrictions on digital objects described in records • Duplicate records for a single digital object

  12. issue: metadata variation • With more records, users need more restrictions • Consistent metadata needed to facilitate these restrictions • One option: normalization of data

  13. issue: metadata variation • Type: the obvious quick win • 240 metadata values mapped to four generic values (text, image, audio, video) • e.g., audio, sound = audio motion, animation, newsreels, etc. = video watercolour, watercolor, slides, etc. = image article, articles, booklet, diss, story, etc. = text

  14. issue: metadata variation • Date: where to begin? • Most records with at least one date • Some records include up to seven dates • No consistent style of date • Subject: out of context, what meaning? • Many records with at least one subject element • But over 100 records with more than 50 subjects • And one record with 1000!

  15. issue: metadata variation • Sample date values <date>2-12-01</date> <date>2002-01-01</date> <date>0000-00-00</date> <date>1822</date> <date>between 1827 and 1833</date> <date>18--?</date> <date>November 13, 1947</date> <date>SEP 1958</date> <date>235 bce</date> <date>Summer, 1948</date>

  16. issue: metadata variation • Sample subject values <subject>30,51,52</subject> <subject>1852, Apr. 22. E[veritt] Judson, letter to Philuta [Judson].</subject> <subject>Slavery--United States--Controversial literature</subject> <subject>view of interior with John Henry sculpture</subject> <subject>Particles (Nuclear physics) -- Research.</subject>

  17. issue: no digital objects • Some records contain links to further description of digital object • But not the digital object itself • Culling difficult • One option: add explanatory text to site • Or, unfortunately, spot-check and remove repositories with this issue

  18. issue: access restrictions • No records where metadata itself is restricted in use (as far as we know!) • Definitely some records where objects are restricted to licensed users • One option: add explanatory text to site • Or sub-set OAIster into free and “partially” free repositories

  19. issue: duplicate records • Two records harvested, different identifiers, same object described and pointed to • Two records harvested inadvertently through aggregators and original repositories

  20. issue: duplicate records • Need algorithm to automate de-duplication • Were duplicates to be identified, how to deal with the issue? • Suppress? • Group? • Flag? • So far, not addressed in OAIster

  21. future of OAIster • Advanced searching • Grouping to aid browsing • Further normalization of data • Handling duplicate records • Saving/emailing/downloading records • Collaboration with other services: search, instructional… • More user testing…

  22. current state of protocol • Popular • As Peter Suber says: • “…no other single idea or technology in the [open-source movement] has enjoyed this density of endorsement and adoption in a six month period.” • Data providers over one year: • June ‘02: 56 repositories / 274,062 records • June ‘03: 187 repositories / 1,246,953 records • Over three-fold increase for repositories • Over four-fold increase for records

  23. future of protocol • Branching out • DC required vs. highly recommended • Use of OAI in closed environments • Static repository protocol • OAI-rights committee • OAI evangelism

  24. contact info • Kat Hagedorn • University of Michigan Libraries, Digital Library Production Service • khage@umich.edu • http://www.oaister.org/

More Related