1 / 22

ITAMP Workshop High Accuracy Atomic Physics in Astronomy Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 8 Aug 2006

Astrophysical Priorities for Accurate X-ray Spectroscopic Diagnostics Nancy S. Brickhouse Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics In Collaboration with Randall K. Smith Acknowledgments to Guo-Xin Chen, Svetlana Kotochigova and Kate Kirby. ITAMP Workshop

easter
Télécharger la présentation

ITAMP Workshop High Accuracy Atomic Physics in Astronomy Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 8 Aug 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Astrophysical Priorities for Accurate X-ray Spectroscopic DiagnosticsNancy S. BrickhouseHarvard-Smithsonian Center for AstrophysicsIn Collaboration with Randall K. SmithAcknowledgments to Guo-Xin Chen, Svetlana Kotochigova and Kate Kirby ITAMP Workshop High Accuracy Atomic Physics in Astronomy Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 8 Aug 2006

  2. Outline • Introduction • Case Studies from X-ray Spectroscopy • Fe XVII 3C/3D • Ne IX density and temperature diagnostics • Fe XVIII and XIX temperature diagnostics • Conclusions

  3. Overview: X-Ray Spectroscopy • High Resolution • λ/Δλ ~ 1000 from gratings, compared with CCD λ/Δλ ~ 10 - 50 • Strong lines of H- and He-like ions and Fe L-shell • Most line profiles unresolved • Spectral models • Collisionally ionized plasmas: stellar coronae, SNR, galaxies, clusters of galaxies • Photoionized plasmas: X-ray binaries, AGN, planetary nebulae

  4. Benchmarking the ATOMDB • ATOMDB (http://cxc.harvard.edu/atomdb) - Astrophysical Plasma Emission Database (APED) input atomic data - Output collisional ionization models from the Astrophysical Plasma Emission Code (APEC) http://cxc.harvard.edu/atomdb/WebGUIDE (Smith et al. 2001) • Emission Line Project Goal to use the Chandra calibration data to benchmark the collisional models • What accuracy do we need and why?

  5. Physical Conditions Determined from X-ray Spectroscopy • Electron Temperature and Temperature Distribution • Electron Density • Elemental Abundances - Relative - Absolute (lines/continuum) • Opacity • Charge State in Time-Dependent (Non- Equilibrium Ionization) Plasma Yohkoh We really want to understand physical processes: e.g. coronal heating, shocks, accretion, winds

  6. Fe XVII “3C/3D” • In general, neon-like Fe XVII is formed over a very broad temperature range. • We observe Fe XVII lines in most stellar coronal spectra. • In solar active regions, it is formed near the peak temperature and thus produces very strong emission lines. • The solar 3C line has long been thought to be “resonance scattered” (gf =2.7) in the solar corona. 3C 2s2 2p61S0 - 2s2 2p5 3d(2P) 1P1λ15.014 3D 2s2 2p61S0 - 2s2 2p5 3d(2P) 3D1λ15.261 TRACE Image in Fe IX

  7. Solution[s] to the Long-Standing Fe XVII 3C/3D Problem • Anomalously low 3C/3D line ratios in solar active regions from resonancescattering? (Rugge & McKenzie 1985) • τ ~ 2.0(Schmelz et al. 1997) Fe XVII 3C -- -- O VIII Ly γ -- Fe XVI -- Fe XVII 3D Sample Data from Solar Maximum Mission FCS Brickhouse & Schmelz 2006

  8. Recent Results • 3D is blended w/ inner shell Fe XVI Brown et al. 2001 • Experiment: Laming et al. 2001; Brown et al.1998 Theory:Chen & Pradhan 2002; Doron & Behar 2002; Loch et al. 2006; Gu 2003 → still ~15% higher than lab Chen 2006 → 5-10% (also Chen et al. 2006, PRA on Ni XIX) • For same observed ratio, optical depth depends on predicted value: 3C/3D = 4.20 → τ = 0.42 3C/3D = 3.30 → τ = 0.17 3C/3D = 2.85 → τ = 0.032 • The 3C line is optically thin in solar active regions! Brickhouse & Schmelz 2006

  9. Therefore, the TRACE Fe XV line is not optically thick either! Active Region Prominence Fe IX Fe XII Fe XV Brickhouse & Schmelz 2006

  10. Ne IX “R-ratio” and “G-ratio” • Classic He-like diagnostics • “R-ratio” = f/i is density-sensitive. • “G-ratio” = (f + i)/r is temperature- sensitive. f = forbidden1s21S0 - 1s2s 3S1 i = intercombination1s21S0 - 1s2p 3P2 1s21S0 - 1s2p 3P1 r = resonance1s21S0 - 1s2p 1P1

  11. Capella Ne IX Spectral Region • Temperature from Ne IX G-ratio is too low Ness et al. 2003 • Mg XI and O VII also give temperatures too low in other stars • Testa et al. 2004

  12. Blending with Fe XIX in the Ne IX Spectral Region Model Fe XIX wavelengths from HULLAC (1% accuracy) With EBIT λmeasurements (Brown et al. 2002, 5-10 mÅ)

  13. Fe XIX Model Wavelengths from Dirac-Fock-Sturm Method Kotochigova, in progress With this Fe XIX model we can match the positions of all features in the spectrum.

  14. Recent Results New Ne IX G-ratio calculations (Chen et al. 2006, PRA) G-ratio agrees with LLNL EBIT measurements of Wargelin (PhD Thesis 1993) Derived T from Capella in better agreement

  15. Fe XVIII and XIX Line Ratios -- Fe XVIII LETG 355 ks LETG 355 ks -- Fe XVIII HETG/MEG 300 ks HETG/HEG 300 ks IEUV ΩEUV [Te] —— = ———— exp (-ΔE/kTe) IX-rayΩX-ray[Te]

  16. Observed/Predicted Line Ratios All X-ray/EUV line ratios are larger than predicted (by all codes). For the strongest lines, the codes agree: discrepancies are 30% for Fe XVIII and a factor of 2 for Fe XIX. Predictions are based on the EMD with its peak at 6 MK. Fe XVIII EUV Fe XIX FUV X-ray Desai et al. 2005

  17. Te-Dependence of Fe XVIII and XIX Line Ratios • Discrepancies not from: • excitation rate uncertainties • calibration uncertainties • absorption • time variability • Simple Te diagnostics not • consistent with the ionization • state of the plasma • Motivated consideration of • time-dependent NEI effects in • impulsively heated loops. 6 MK EMD peak

  18. Non-Equilibrium Ionization ? • EMD models assume collisional ionization equilibrium: Flux ~ ε(Te) ∫Ne2 dV • In an NEI plasma, the charge state lags the instantaneous temperature Te • NeΔt determines the charge state • For a given Ne and Te , ionization is very fast compared with recombination • Mass conservation (Ne dV = const) implies that a coronal loop, impulsively heated and then cooled by radiation and conduction, will emit primarily during recombination.

  19. Fe XIX / Fe XVIII Fe XVII / Fe XVIII Additional data from other stars Courtesy P. Desai

  20. Ionization Balance? Decreased ionization rate x 2 • Recombination rate coefficients accurate to ~30% • Ionization rate coefficients?

  21. Conclusions • Accurate atomic data are a big investment: priorities should be based on astrophysical importance and needs • For most important diagnostics, line ratios accurate to 10% or better are possible • Interesting astrophysical processes can be explored (e.g. non-equilibrium ionization) with accurate diagnostics • Wavelengths need to be accurate to 1 mÅ • 3-way collaboration among astrophysics, experiment and theory is needed • Experiments can’t substitute for theory

More Related