1 / 27

Living Labs

Living Labs. University of Oslo Institute of informatics , INF 2260 Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF. Agenda. Limitations of usability testing Users as sources of creativity Living Labs and the co-creative user. Limitations of usability testing . http://www.infodesign.com.au.

easter
Télécharger la présentation

Living Labs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Living Labs University of Oslo Institute ofinformatics, INF 2260 Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF

  2. Agenda • Limitationsofusability testing • Users as sourcesofcreativity • Living Labs and theco-creativeuser Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  3. Limitationsofusability testing Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  4. http://www.infodesign.com.au Are therelimitations to theusefulnessofthisapproach? Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  5. Usability testing The design right vs. The right design pp. 381-391 Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  6. Usability testing harmful? Early stage design Radicalinnovations Cultural changes Mute creativeideas Identify problems due to immaturetechnologyratherthantheunderlyingconcept Dismissconcept due to lackofaccept in currentculture Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  7. Creative input appreciated in system development, butusability testing typicallygive problem lists Usability problems oftenknown (?) … buthelpsprioritizing Redesignsuggestions … spark creativity … and providenewideas to solve known problems. Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  8. Know thelimitationsofusability testing and employ it accordingly. How to overcomethelimitationsofusability testing? Considerotherapproaches to getcreative input -> Maybeuserscanprovidecreative input? Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  9. Users as sourcesofcreativity Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  10. Userscreative? Really? Foto: michelhrv (Flickr, creative commons) Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  11. Userscreative? Really? Usersdidn’tcreatethis … or this … or this Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  12. In whichwayscanuserscontibutecreatively? Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  13. Users as sourcesofcreativity (1): Participatory design Participation as a democratic right Userscontributeuniqueinsight and knowledge in design due to domainexperience Userinvolved in creativeprocesseswith designers and stakeholders Assumption: Tightcooperationbetween designers, users and stakeholders willimproveprocess and outcome. Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  14. Users as sourcesofcreativity (2): Social constructionoftech. Technologyoutside a socialcontext is ambiguous, in particularbefore it has reachedwidespreaduse. Innovationhappenswhensocialgroupsgivesmeaning to technologicalartifacts Evolvingmeanings given to artifactscan be used to drive innovationprocesses Assumption: Observationofsocialgroupsusingnewtechnologywillgiveinsight in ways to developthetechnology. Pinch, T.J. and Bijker, W.E. (1987) The socialconstructionof facts and artifacts. Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  15. Users as sourcesofcreativity (3): Userinnovation • Von Hippel: Usersinnovate; in particularleadingusers • excellent in theirfield • not satisfiedwithavailabletechnology • Examples from a range offields • Opensource software • Printedcircutboards • Surgerytools • Extreme sports • Assumption: Incorporatinguserinnovation in theinnovationprocesswill lead to more radicalinnovations Von Hippel, E. (2005) Democratizinginnovation, MIT Press Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  16. Users as sourceofcreativity Users and designers in co-creativeprocesses Participatory design Social constructionoftechnology Userinnovation Novelmeanings and usesemerge in socialgroups over time Usersadapt designs and developnewwhencurrentsolutionsdoes not fill theirneeds Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  17. Living Labs and theco-creativeuser Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  18. Living Labs – theidea ant-farms.com Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  19. Living Labs – theidea Amazon.com: Fascinations AntWorks Illuminated Blue Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  20. Living Labs – theidea • Whatifwe do the same with humans? • Identifyusers in theireverydaycontext • Addnewtechnology / futuretechnology • Wecould … • Observewhathappens(Social construction) • Identifythosewhoadaptthetechnology to bettersuittheirneeds(Userinnovation) • Inviteusers in co-creativeprocesses to devlopthetechnologyfurther(Participatory design) Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  21. Living Labs – thebasics <- Social construction and userinnovation <-Grounded in participatory design Commerciallyavailableproduct Environments for innovation and development • … whereusersareexposet to newsolutions • … in familiarcontexts • … as part of medium – or long term studies New term withinthefieldof ICT • Emergingconcept • Limited literature Innovation support Contextresearch Discovery Co-creation Evaluation Technical testing Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  22. The origins: Ubiquitouscomputing Living Labs Classroom 2000: an ICT augmentedclassroom Vision: Utilizelecture & teacher/studentnotetakingoutsideclassroom Purposes: - Discovery - Evaluation Abowd, G.D. (1999) Classroom 2000: An experiment with the instrumentation of a living educational environment. IBM Systems Journal, 38(4), pp. 508-530. Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  23. The detour: Living Labs as testbeds eStadium: Stadium instrumehtedwithadvancedwirelessinfrastructure Aim: Research advancednetworking and services Purposes: - Evaluation - Technical testing Zhong, X., Coyle, E.J. (2006) eStadium: a Wireless "Living Lab" for Safety and Infotainment Applications. First International Conference on Communications and Networking in China, 2006. ChinaCom '06, pp. 1-6, IEEE. Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  24. The current: Living Labs as innovationplatforms • The European waveof Living Labs • Public-private partnerships • Government • Industry • Academia • User and stakeholders seen as co-creators; that is, creativeresources to be utilized in theinnovationprocess • Aim for directcontributionsofusers and stakeholders throughouttheinnovationprocess http://www.openlivinglabs.eu/ Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  25. The current: Living Labs as innovationplatforms • Copenhagen Living Lab: IABIS • Aim: Create ICT solutions to improve living for elderly and employed at nursinghomes • Involved users: • Employees at two nursing homes • (Family of residents at the same nursing homes) • Also: Observation of residents and employees • Users/stakeholdersinvolved in: • - Context research • - Discovery • - Co-creation • Evaluation http://www.iabis.dk/ Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  26. The current: Living Labs as innovationplatforms • Botnia Living Lab: Apollon • Aim: Gainexperiencewithin-homeuseofenergysaving ICT. • Involved users: • 30-40 households installing prototype energy saving ICT and use it for several months. • Users/stakeholdersinvolved in: • - Discovery • - Co-creation • Evaluation http://saberproject.kyab.se// Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

  27. Summary Limitationsofusability testing • Does not helpyougetthe right design Creativeusers? • Participatory design • Social constructionoftechnology • Userinnovation Living Labs • European Living Labs aiming for co-creation; users and stakeholders to be involved as creativeresources • Evolvingapproach – still in itsearlyyears Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF | asf@sintef.no

More Related