1 / 8

Financing, resources diversification, private funds

Financing, resources diversification, private funds. Daniel Münich (CERGE-EI, MŠMT). TRENDS. STRENGHTS &CHALENGES. OVER-RELIANCE ON PUBLIC FUNDING. Private funding from : Students (domestic, EU, non-EU) Firms (R&D, innovations, students) Other Consequences

eaton-benton
Télécharger la présentation

Financing, resources diversification, private funds

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Financing, resources diversification, private funds Daniel Münich (CERGE-EI, MŠMT)

  2. TRENDS

  3. STRENGHTS &CHALENGES

  4. OVER-RELIANCE ON PUBLIC FUNDING • Private funding from: • Students (domestic, EU, non-EU) • Firms (R&D, innovations, students) • Other • Consequences • Constraint of faster growth of the system • Inefficient behavior of students and schools (incentives) …introduce fees and attract private sector

  5. FRAMEWORKS FOR PRIVATE FEES/TUITION (1) • Student loan system, need-based scholarships • Differential fees by level of studies • BA, MA, foreign students: pros & cons, Irish experience? • Encourage growth of private tertiary sector • make students eligible for public loans/scholarships • real estate endowment (?)

  6. FRAMEWORKS FOR PRIVATE FEES/TUITION (2) • Dual fee system • Charge more market based programs, non-EU students. • Higher tuition subsidies (public) to priority fields • Parallel fees structures – not recommended • Attract support from industries (students and R&D)

  7. REFORM OF FINANCING • Current funding mechanism • streamlined and transparent • according to normative (current) costs) (?) • according to labor market needs (?) • more responsive to soc-econ needs (?) • consolidate graduate-base component • who will decide? • is there a space left for customer’s preferences and competitive forces? • Greater governance power to management • priorities setting (feedback?) • allocation of funds

  8. INCENTIVES, INFORMATION, COMPETION Government Information flows Rules, goals, incentives setting Schools Students Firms Can we afford relying on smart central planning? Is there a space for disciplining competitive forces?

More Related