1 / 16

INCREASING ADOPTION OF AIDET: A STUDENT-LED QUALITY IMPROVEMENT RESEARCH PROJECT

INCREASING ADOPTION OF AIDET: A STUDENT-LED QUALITY IMPROVEMENT RESEARCH PROJECT. Research Club 1/23/18. Background. Many hospitalized patients do not understand their treatment and care plans 1 . Prior research shows that better physician communication skills improve patient outcomes 2 .

ebolden
Télécharger la présentation

INCREASING ADOPTION OF AIDET: A STUDENT-LED QUALITY IMPROVEMENT RESEARCH PROJECT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. INCREASING ADOPTION OF AIDET: A STUDENT-LED QUALITY IMPROVEMENT RESEARCH PROJECT Research Club 1/23/18

  2. Background • Many hospitalized patients do not understand their treatment and care plans1. • Prior research shows that better physician communication skills improve patient outcomes2. • Since these communication skills are teachable, many institutions implement a standardized communication tool for physicians and trainees3, 4, 5, 6. • The evidence-based Acknowledge, Introduce, Duration, Explanation, and Thank (AIDET) communication tool improves patient and provider interactions via a demonstrated increase in patient satisfaction scores in both institutional and national HCAHPS metrics7, 8, 9.

  3. Study Questions • Aim Statement: In the next 6 months, we will increase the adoption of AIDET in observed patient interactions in Internal Medicine to > 85% in all categories. • Baseline data • UNM IM night accept team rounds

  4. Study Questions • Intervention or methods • What statistical analysis did/will you perform? percentage analysis • Was this IRB approved? Yes • Intervention: resident and attending educational sessions • Post intervention measures: audits and real-time feedback

  5. Pre-intervention data • 88.89% (24/27) • 92.60% (25/27) • 85.19% (23/27) • 92.60% (25/27) • 80.00% (20/25) 2 N/As • 33.33% (9/27) • 55.56% (15/27)

  6. Post-intervention data • 96% (25/26) • 100% (26/26) • 100% (26/26) • 88% (23/26) • 88% (23/26) • 85% (22/26) • 96% (25/26)

  7. Team and Roles • Melissa Martinez, MS4 • Christopher Bartlett, PGY3 • Christina DeShayes, SON • Greg Fahl, MS4 • Anna Jones, PGY3 • Gina Miller, MS4 • Katie Ogawa, MS4 • Aaron Stecker, PGY2 • Gina Stroud, MS4 • Dr. Eileen Barrett, supervising physician

  8. Planning/Study Phase • Site visit • Literature review • Pre-intervention data • Intervention: education • Post-intervention data collection & comparison

  9. Study Limitations • Only IM teams were surveyed • Not all teams within IM were surveyed • Interventions did not reach all subsequently surveyed

  10. UNM QI and Patient Safety Goal • List which goal(s) your project falls under: 2016 Strategic Goals • Goal 1 – Develop Clinical Master Facility Plan  • Goal 2 – Increase Ambulatory access and throughput – Increase clinic volumes 4% – Complete centralized scheduling for adult clinics – Expand ambulatory capacity with new clinics – Implement the full scope of PCMH model  • Goal 3 – Increase Inpatient capacity – Decrease adult LOS (excluding OB) to 6.56 • Increase daily discharge by 3 • Decrease Adult LOS >15 days by 20% • Increase monthly adult discharges (excluding OB) by 2pm to 500/month • Home Health program • Post-Acute Care affiliations • Goal 4.1 – Improve tertiary referral transfer capabilities – Increase transfers from outside by 6 per month (72 annual)  • Goal 5 – Information Technology Implementation – EMR improvements – Population Health – Revenue Cycle – Consumer Access  • Goal 6.1 – Increase surgical volumes by 5%  • Goal 7 – Maintain accreditation deemed status  • Goal 8 – Improve National Patient Safety Goal, Core Measures and Mortality Index Outcomes • Goal 9 and 10 – Improve Patient satisfaction • Goal 11 – Foster strong community engagement, proactively address community concerns and meet community needs – Partner with Bernalillo County and Indian Health Services in the development of Behavioral Health Programs and Community based clinics • Goal 12 – Improve staff and faculty engagement and satisfaction – Turnover rates less than 15% – Improve staff satisfaction by 10% – Implement provider ease of practice programs – Conduct physician satisfaction survey  • Goal 13 – Develop shared governance for Magnet status

  11. Next Steps • Share results with IM leadership • Present findings at SHM • Project sustainability

  12. Barriers/Challenges • Language barriers. • Night accept team at capacity. • Hawthorne effect. • Time constraints.

  13. What I would do with my project if I had unlimited resources • Expand audits hospital-wide • Regular audits hospital-wide • Correlating patient satisfaction with AIDET use. • Influence of AIDET use on HCAHPS data.

  14. Questions?

  15. Upcoming Deadlines • AAMC-Integrating Quality – usually in Spring • National Healthcare Coalition Preparedness Conference-June • Mountain West SGIM is usually in July • UNM Health Science Center Annual Education Day - August • NM ACP HVC, QI, research, clinical vignettes - September • NM SHM research and innovations abstracts - September • National SGIM – September • Western Regional Meeting of the American Federation of Medical Research​- Sept • SACME- October • APDIM- Academic Internal Medicine week- November • National ACP - November • American Geriatrics Society -December • National SHM – December

  16. Sources: • O’leary K, Kulkarni N, Landler M, et al. Hospitalized patients’ understanding of their plan of care. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2010. • Studer Q. Keep your patients coming back. MGMA Connexion. 2008. • Braverman A, Kunkel E, Katz L, Katona A, et al. Do I Buy It? How AIDET Training Changes Residents' Values about Patient Care. Journal of Patient Experience. 2015. • Makoul G, Zick A, Green M. An Evidence-Based Perspective on Greetings in Medical Encounters. Arch Intern Med. 2007. • Kelley J, Kraft-Todd G, Schapira L, Kossowsky J, Riess H. The influence of the patient-clinician relationship on health care outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2014, • Rao J, Anderson L, Inui T, et al. Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients: a systematic review of the evidence. Med Care 2007. • Allen T, Rieck T, Salsbury S. Patient perceptions of an AIDET and hourly rounding program in a community hospital: Results of a qualitative study. Patient Experience Journal. 2016. • Scott J. Utilizing AIDET and Other Tools to Increase Patient Satisfaction Scores. Radiology Management. 2012. • Zamora R. Influence of AIDET in the Improving Quality Metrics in a Small Community Hospital - before and after Analysis. Journal of Hospital Administration. 2015.

More Related