1 / 18

Seismic Stimulation for Enhanced Oil Recovery

Seismic Stimulation for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Steve Pride, Mike Kowalsky, Valeri Korneev LBNL, Earth Sciences Division, Geophysics Department, Berkeley, CA, USA. Todays Talk:. The basis of a physical model . A theoretical “ stimulation criterion ”.

edan-odonnell
Télécharger la présentation

Seismic Stimulation for Enhanced Oil Recovery

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Seismic Stimulation for Enhanced Oil Recovery Steve Pride, Mike Kowalsky, Valeri Korneev LBNL, Earth Sciences Division, Geophysics Department, Berkeley, CA, USA

  2. Todays Talk: • The basis of a physical model. • A theoretical “stimulation criterion”. • Lattice-Boltzmann simulations of seismically stimulated two-phase flow at the pore scale. • The Foraker test site for the RPSEA project. • Conclusions

  3. Context: As much as 60% of the world’s oil is in known reservoirs but is trapped on capillary barriers and is effectively “stuck”. Seismic Stimulation: A seismic wave is to “shake the stuck oil loose” and get it flowing again toward a production well.

  4. Oil Cut Oil cut % Oil Production (B/day) Oil Production stimulation applied Increase in Oil Production after Stimulation at Occidental’s Elk Hills Field, California

  5. The condition for a stuck oil bubble: The production pressure drop along the bubble is just balanced by a capillary-pressure increase. Beresnev et al. (2005) Pride et al. (2009)

  6. The production-gradient force that always acts on the fluids: Poroelasticity determines the seismic force acting on the fluids: “acceleration of grains” “wavelength-scale fluid-pressure gradient” where is the seismic strain rate.

  7. The seismic force adds to the production gradient and can overcome the capillary barrier whenever: “stimulation criterion” where Capillary force resisting bubble movement at the barrier (constriction). When the bubble does not become trapped on the barrier.

  8. Lattice-Boltzmann Movie • NOTES • No green arrow = • no applied forcing • Single green arrow = • production-gradient only • Double green arrow = • two periods of seismic stress • + production-gradient • “when stimulation is applied, bubbles coalesce creating a longer stream of oil that flows even in absence of stimulation”

  9. Snapshots and average oil speed during the four stages of a typical “production run”: • Oil separates from water without applied forcing. • Production gradient applied; oil flows some, then gets stuck. • Two periods of seismic stimulation applied that frees bubbles. • Stimulation turned off and new steady-flow state emerges. running average

  10. Volume of produced oil when no stimulation applied (dependence on )

  11. Volume of produced oil is increased when stimulation applied (wave strain ) • Filled symbols / solid lines • = stimulation applied • Open symbols / dashed lines • = stimulation not applied.

  12. Foraker Field in Osage County, Oklahoma Reservoir is a fractured chert called the “Chat Formation”

  13. Simple Seismic Model at Foraker Seismic Velocity (vertical section) Peak particle acceleration (plan view)

  14. Fc = capillary force Used values porosity surface tension permeability contact angle oil bubble length

  15. Maps of Stimulation Potential s Created Using: where

  16. Pressure gradient around the 20 wells to be stimulated at the Foraker site. Stimulation Potential The closer to 1, the greater the potential for liberating oil. Characteristic stuck bubble length of h = 10 cm.

  17. Conclusions of the modeling to date: • Stimulation criterion successfully verified by the 2D • Lattice-Boltzmann simulations so far conducted. • Need to extend the simulations to 3D and to larger systems. • Over a significant and realistic range of seismic amplitudes • and reservoir conditions, seismic stimulation seems to work • The Foraker test site will be the first field test of the capillary • threshold model and one of the most definitive tests to date. • The Foraker site is still being monitored for the pre-stimulation • well-by-well production statistics. Stimulation is expected to • begin by March of 2011.

More Related