1 / 14

A. AGUSTONI, M. BRENNA, R. FARANDA, E. TIRONI Dipartimento di Elettrotecnica

A. AGUSTONI, M. BRENNA, R. FARANDA, E. TIRONI Dipartimento di Elettrotecnica Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. G. SIMIOLI CES I Milan, Italy. Distributed Generation Control Methodologies and Network Reconfiguration: Effects on Voltage Profile. Distribution test network.

edana
Télécharger la présentation

A. AGUSTONI, M. BRENNA, R. FARANDA, E. TIRONI Dipartimento di Elettrotecnica

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A. AGUSTONI, M. BRENNA, R. FARANDA, E. TIRONI Dipartimento di Elettrotecnica Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy G. SIMIOLI CESI Milan, Italy Distributed Generation Control Methodologies and Network Reconfiguration: Effects on Voltage Profile Clemson, March 13, 2002

  2. Distribution test network Clemson, March 13, 2002

  3. Voltage Profile in MV Distribution Network These figures show the voltage diagrams along a 20kV line in the absence and in the presence of a regulation system.The use of ULTC (Under-Load-Tap-Changers) at the primary sub-station greatly improves the trend along the time axis, but the voltage drop along the line remains almost the same. Clemson, March 13, 2002

  4. Costant Power Factor Control of Distributed Generation We have limited to ±4% the, voltage drop: Load Generator Results Objective function Clemson, March 13, 2002

  5. Costant Power Factor Control of Distributed Generation Table shows the maximum voltage drop at any node k in the course of one day as a function of a 5 MW generator's position.The space-time diagram of the voltage along the line shows how the generator and the UTLC at the primary sub-station can improve the voltage profiles (surface more flat). Clemson, March 13, 2002

  6. Constant Voltage Control of Distributed Generation Condition Generator Reactive Power Clemson, March 13, 2002

  7. Constant Voltage Control of Distributed Generation To keep the rated voltage at the node where a 5 MW DG is inserted h = 0 corresponds. By carrying out the procedure described we obtain the results in table. The graph shows that constant voltage control further improves the voltage profiles along the line, but that, especially with changes in the load, it maintains the voltage most stable at the node where the generator is inserted. Clemson, March 13, 2002

  8. L01 L12 L23 B 1 2 3 HV HV/ MV Netwo rk Transformer A Load 2 Load 1 Load 3 G G G ~ ~ ~ DG1 DG2 DG3 0 L36 L04 L45 L56 C 4 5 6 Load 4 Load 5 Load 6 Network reconfiguration Clemson, March 13, 2002

  9. L01 L12 L23 B 1 2 3 HV HV/ MV Netwo rk Transformer A Load 2 Load 1 Load 3 G G G ~ ~ ~ DG1 DG2 DG3 0 L36 L04 L45 C 4 5 6 Load 4 Load 5 Load 6 Network reconfiguration Clemson, March 13, 2002

  10. L01 L12 L23 B 1 2 3 HV HV/ MV Netwo rk Transformer A Load 2 Load 1 Load 3 G G G ~ ~ ~ DG1 DG2 DG3 0 L36 L04 L56 C 4 5 6 Load 4 Load 5 Load 6 Network reconfiguration Clemson, March 13, 2002

  11. L01 L12 L23 B 1 2 3 HV HV/ MV Netwo rk Transformer A Load 2 Load 1 Load 3 G G G ~ ~ ~ DG1 DG2 DG3 0 L36 L45 L56 4 5 6 Load 4 Load 5 Load 6 Network reconfiguration Clemson, March 13, 2002

  12. Network reconfiguration We want to insert in 3 two 5 MW groups with a power factor of 0.9; that is, with total power exceeding the line's total load, but such as not to overload the line. The power flow has now been inverted, and the voltage at the end of L1 is consequently greater than at the beginningthat are unacceptable for the proper operation of the electric power system. By operating a network reconfiguration the optimal network configuration, that is the one that minimizes voltage variations at the nodes, is the one that involves shifting loads 5 and 6 from line L2 to line L1. Clemson, March 13, 2002

  13. Conclusion • The introduction of generators into distribution networks, built and operated in such a way that they are passive, alters the power flows and consequently the voltage profiles. • It has been pointed out that the correct positioning of the generators may lead to an improvement in the voltage profiles, both in terms of space (along the line) and in terms of time (with variations in absorption). In the second case, a decisive factor is the type of generator control: indeed, as we have seen, constant voltage control greatly reduces the voltage variations during the day, but is generally speaking more expensive to operate than constant power factor control. How economical it is will therefore depend on the sensitivity of the loads to voltage variations. Clemson, March 13, 2002

  14. Conclusion • Should it not be possible to select the position in which to insert the generator, overvoltages may occur at the point of insertion of the generator. In such an event, the problem can be solved by suitable reconfiguration of the network and more uniform redistribution of the power flows. • If adequate reconfiguration of the network were not possible, it would be necessary to reduce the maximum injectable power of the generator, or else to adapt line L1 to the new requirements. Clemson, March 13, 2002

More Related