190 likes | 353 Vues
The GAINS model. Rationale. Air pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) often stem from the same sources Energy consumption and agricultural activities contribute large proportions to total emissions
E N D
Rationale • Air pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) often stem from the same sources • Energy consumption and agricultural activities contribute large proportions to total emissions • Changes in energy consumption and agricultural activities patterns can influence emissions of both air pollutants and GHGs • There are physical and economic interactions between control measures
GAINS: GHG-Air pollution INteractions and Synergies • Extension of the RAINS integrated assessment model for air pollution to GHGs • SO2, NOx, VOC, NH3, PM and CO2, CH4, N2O, HFC, CFC, SF6 • First implementation for Europe completed, work on China and India underway, feasibility study for Latin America completed. • GHG emissions consistent with UNFCCC, GHG cost data from reviewed literature,air pollution and cost data reviewed by European stakeholders
Common issues for emission control strategiesfor air pollution and greenhouse gases • Measures with simultaneous impacts on GHG and air pollutant emissions • Synergies from efficiency improvements, increased use of natural gas, agricultural measures, etc. • Renewables • Trade-offs for desulfurization, technology lock-in, etc. • Bio-fuels • Combustion in small sources increases PM and thus causes negative health impacts • Radiative forcing of incomplete combustion products (VOC and PM) could compensate effects of C reduction • Diesel • Health impacts of PM, radiative impacts of black carbon • Methane reductions • Yield multiple benefits on radiative forcing and ozone
The GAINS model: The RAINS multi-pollutant/ multi-effect framework extended to GHGs Economic synergies between emission control measures Physical interactions Multiple benefits
Emission control options considered in GAINSwith country/region-specific application potentials and costs CO2: 162 options for power plants, transport, industry, domestic CH4 : 28 options for the gas sector, waste management, enteric fermentation, manure management, coal mines, rice paddies N2O : 18 options for arable land and grassland, industry, combustion, health care, waste treatment F-gases : 22 options for refrigeration, mobile and stationary air conditioning, HCFC22 production, primary aluminum production, semiconductor industry and other sectors Air pollutants : ~1500 options for SO2, NOx, VOC, NH3, PM
Main mitigation options for CO2162 options considered in GAINS • Power plants • Fuels shift to natural gas and renewables • Co-generation • IGCC + carbon capture • Transport • More efficient vehicles (hybrid cars) • Alternative fuels (ethanol, gas, biodiesel, hydrogen) • Industry • End-use savings • Fuel shifts • Domestic • Insulation • Solar, biomass • Fuel shift to natural gas
Main mitigation options for CH4 28 options considered in GAINS • Gas sector • Reduced leakages during gas transmission and distribution • Flaring instead of venting • Waste management • Recycling/composting of biodegradable waste instead of landfill • Methane recovery from landfills • Enteric fermentation • Dietary changes for cattle coupled with livestock reductions • Manure management • Anaerobic digestion plants and stable adaptation • Coal mines • Upgraded gas recovery in coal mines • Rice paddies • Modified rice strains
Main mitigation options for N2O 18 options considered in GAINS • Arable land and grassland • Reduced fertilizer application • Optimal timing of fertilizer application • Nitrification inhibitors • Precision farming • Less use of histosols (peat soils) • Industry • Emission controls in adipic acid and nitric acid industry • Combustion • Modified fluidized bed combustion • Health care • Reduced N2O use • Waste treatment • Optimized waste water treatment
Main mitigation options for F-gases22 options considered in GAINS • Refrigeration (domestic, commercial, transport and industrial) • Recollection, alternative refrigerants and good practice • Mobile and stationary air conditioning • Alternative refrigerants, process modifications, good practice • HCFC22 production • Incineration • Primary aluminum production • Conversion to other processes • Semiconductor industry • Limited PFC use through alternative processes • Other sectors • SO2 cover for magnesium production • Good practice for gas insulated switchgears • Alternative propellants for foams and aerosols • End of life recollection of SF6
Differences between GAINS and RAINS in the optimization (technology representation) • RAINS optimization: • Decide how far to move up the cost curve (keep underlying activity fix!) • Exclude multi-pollutant technologies • GAINS optimization • Decide which technology to use (incl. multi-pollutant) • If cost-effective and possible, change the underlying activity (through e.g. efficiency improvement)
The GAINS optimization in brief Objective function: Minimization of total emission control costs C for add-on measures (x) and structural changes (y): Application levels(x) and substitution potentials(y) are constrained: Emissions are calculated from activity levels and emission factors: Sectoral emissions of current legislation may not increase: Activity levels plus substitution levels must remain constant to satisfy demand:
Multi-pollutant measures (1) • Structural measures: • Energy savings, efficiency improvements, bans:all pollutants ↓ • Increased use of natural gas: CO2, SO2, VOC, NOx, PM ↓ CH4 ↑ • Biomass: CO2 ↓VOC, PM, CH4 ↑ • Stationary sources: • SCR, SNCR: NOx, CO ↓, NH3, N2O ↑ • Fluidized bed combustion: SO2, NOx↓, N2O ↑ • Advanced residential combustion: VOC, PM, CO, CH4↓ • FGD: SO2, PM ↓ CO2 ↑ • IGCC: CO2, SO2, NOx, PM ↓ • CHP: all pollutants ↓ • Mobile sources: • Euro-standards: NOx, VOC, PM, CO ↓ NH3, N2O ↑ • Low sulfur fuels: SO2, PM ↓ • Diesel: CO2, VOC↓, PM, NOx, SO2 ↑
Multi-pollutant measures (2) • Agricultural sources: • Low emission pig housing – NH3, CH4 ↓N2O ↑ • Covered storage of slurry – NH3 ↓CH4↑ • Injection of manure – NH3 ↓N2O ↑ • Anaerobic digestion (biogas) – CH4, N2O ↓CO2 ↑NH3↓↑ • Other sources • Gas recovery and flaring: CH4↓CO2, PM, VOC, SO2, NOx, CO ↑ • Gas recovery and re-use: CH4↓ CO2 ↑ • Improving flaring efficiency: PM, VOC, NOx, SO2, CO ↓ • Waste incineration: CH4↓ CO2 ↑ • Gas recovery from wastewater treatment: CH4↓ CO2 ↑ In total approx 500 measures with multi-pollutant impacts considered in GAINS
Air pollutant emissions as a function of CO2 mitigation (EU-25, 2020)
Ambition level of Thematic Strategy Net costs for further air pollution control as a function of CO2 mitigation (EU-25, 2020) - Sequential approach Sequential approach: Climate policy first – then air pollution control on the resulting energy pattern Baseline
Ambition level of Thematic Strategy Cost savings from an integrated approachProvisional GAINS estimates, EU-25, 2020 Integrated approach: Joint optimization of GHG and air pollution control Baseline
Plans for further work on GAINS • Improved interface between PRIMES and GAINS • Improved representation of the nitrogen cycle • Including the role of agricultural policies as “surface response” representation of selected CAPRI scenarios • Quantification of radiatiave forcing (of aerosols) • Simulation of economic instruments • Extension to Asia and other regions