1 / 12

Knowledge Environments for Science: Representative Projects

Knowledge Environments for Science: Representative Projects. Ian Foster Argonne National Laboratory University of Chicago http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~foster. Symposium on Knowledge Environments for Science, November 26, 2002. Comments Informed By Participation in ….

edric
Télécharger la présentation

Knowledge Environments for Science: Representative Projects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Knowledge Environments for Science:Representative Projects Ian Foster Argonne National Laboratory University of Chicago http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~foster Symposium on Knowledge Environments for Science, November 26, 2002

  2. Comments Informed By Participation in … • E-science/Grid application projects, e.g. • Earth System Grid: environmental science • GriPhyN, PPDG, EU DataGrid: physics • NEESgrid: earthquake engineering • Grid technology R&D projects • Globus Project and the Globus Toolkit • NSF Middleware Initiative • Grid infrastructure deployment projects • Alliance, TeraGrid, DOE Sci. Grid, NASA IPG • Intl. Virtual Data Grid Laboratory (iVDGL) • Global Grid Forum: community & standards

  3. Data Grids for High Energy Physics • Enable community to access & analyze petabytes of data • Coordinated intl projects • GriPhyN, PPDG, iVDGL, EU DataGrid, DataTAG • Challenging computer science research • Real deployments and applications • Defining analysis architecture for LHC

  4. NEESgrid Earthquake Engineering Collaboratory U.Nevada Reno www.neesgrid.org

  5. Galaxy cluster size distribution Chimera Virtual Data System + GriPhyN Virtual Data Toolkit + iVDGL Data Grid (many CPUs) Communities Need Not be Large:E.g., Astronomical Data Analysis Size distribution of galaxy clusters? www.griphyn.org/chimera

  6. A “Knowledge Environment” is a System For … “Small teams” “Accessing specialized devices” “Interpersonal collaboration” “Sharing information” “Accessing services” “Enabling large-scale computation” “Integrating data” “Large communities”

  7. It’s All of the Above: Enabling “Post-Internet Science” • Pre-Internet science • Theorize &/or experiment, in small teams • Post-Internet science • Construct and mine very large databases • Develop computer simulations & analyses • Access specialized devices remotely • Exchange information within distributed multidisciplinary teams • Need to manage dynamic, distributed infrastructures, services, and applications

  8. Enabling Infrastructure for Knowledge Environments for Science (aka “The Grid”) “Resource sharing & coordinated problem solving in dynamic, multi-institutional virtual organizations”

  9. Grid Infrastructure • What? • Broadly deployed services in support of fundamental collaborative activities • Services, software, and policies enabling on-demand access to critical resources • Open standards, software, infrastructure • Open Grid Services Architecture (GGF) • Globus Toolkit (Globus Project: ANL, USC/ISI) • NMI, iVDGL, TeraGrid • Grid infrastructure R&D&ops is itself a distributed & international community

  10. Lessons Learned (1) • Importance of standard infrastructure • Software: facilitate construction of systems, and construction of interoperable systems • Services: authentication, discovery, …, … • Needs investment in research, development, deployment, operations, training • Building & operating infrastructure is hard • Challenging technical & policy issues • Requisite skills not always available • Can challenge existing organizations

  11. Lessons Learned (2) • Importance of community engagement • “Maine and Texas must have something to communicate” • Big science traditions seem to help • Discipline champions certainly help • Effective projects often true collaborations between disciplines and computer scientistis • Importance of international cooperation • Science is international, so is expertise • Challenging, requires incentives & support

  12. Lessons Learned (3) • Collaborative science/Grids are a wonderful source of computer science problems • E.g., “virtual data grid” (GriPhyN): data, programs, derivations as community resources • E.g., security within virtual organizations • Work in this space can be of intense interest to industry • E.g., current rapid uptake of Grid technologies

More Related